Productivity of criminal justice scholars across the career

Journal of Criminal Justice Education

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 428-443

  Frost, Natasha A ^a   Phillips, Nickie D ^a   Clear, Todd R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36049001149     PISSN: 10511253     EISSN: 17459117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511250701705388     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ali, S., Young, H. and Ali, N. (1996) Determining the quality of publications and research for tenure or promotion decisions. Library Review, 45:1, pp. 39-52.
2. Baldwin, R. and Chronister, J. (2001) Teaching without tenure: Practices and policies for a new era, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
3. Brand, M. (1999) Why tenure is indispensable. Chronicle of Higher Education, 45:30, p. A64.
4. Bufkin, J. (2004) Criminology/criminal justice master's programs in the United States: Searching for commonalities. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 15:2, pp. 239-262.
5. Burgan, M. (2003) Tenure and its discontents. Academe, 89:6, p. 96.
6. Carnegie Foundation (2007) The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education
7. Clear, T. (2001) Has academic criminal justice come of age?. Justice Quarterly, 8:4, pp. 709-727.
8. Cohn, E. and Farrington, D. (1994) Who are the most-cited scholars in major American criminology and criminal justice journals?. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22:6, pp. 517-534.
9. Cohn, E. and Farrington, D. (1998) Assessing the quality of American doctoral program faculty in criminology and criminal justice, 1991-1995. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 9:2, pp. 187-210.
10. Cohn, E. and Farrington, D. (2007) Changes in scholarly influence in major American criminology and criminal justice journals between 1986 and 2000. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18:1, pp. 6-34.
11. Cohn, E., Farrington, D. and Sorensen, J. (2000) Journal publications of Ph.D. graduates from American criminology and criminal justice programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 11:1, pp. 36-49.
12. Fabianic, D. (2002) The publication productivity of criminal justice faculty in criminal justice journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, pp. 549-558.
13. Fairweather, J. (2002) The mythologies of faculty productivity: Implications for institutional policy and decision making. The Journal of Higher Education, 73:1, pp. 26-48.
14. Finkelstein, M. (2003) Floodlights, spotlights, and flashlights: Tenure meets the glare of empirical social science. The Review of Higher Education, 26:4, pp. 503-513.
15. Frost, N. A. and Clear, T. R. (2007) Doctoral education in criminology & criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18:1, pp. 35-52.
16. Green, R., Baskind, F., Best, A. and Boyd, A. (1997) Getting beyond the productivity gap: Assessing variation in social work scholarship. Journal of Social Work Education, 33, pp. 541-543.
17. Guild, T. (2007) The range and extent of academic freedom and tenure for faculty members in the academy. Pro Bono, 13:1, pp. 4-6.
18. Holden, E. and Black, M. (1996) Psychologists in medical schools - Professional issues for the further: How are rank and tenure associated with productivity and satisfaction?. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27:4, pp. 407-414.
19. Johnson, H. W. and Hull, G. H. (1995) Publication productivity of BSW faculty. Journal of Social Work Education, 31:3, pp. 358-368.
20. Levy, A. (2003) Tenure and diversity. Academe, 89:5, p. 103.
21. Ludwig, A. (1985) Is there life after tenure?. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 39:1, pp. 49-56.
22. Massey, W. and Wilger, A. (1995) Improving productivity. Change, 27, pp. 10-20.
23. Ovington, J., Diamantes, D., Roby, D. and Ryan, C. (2003) An analysis of prevailing myths regarding tenure and promotion. Education, 123:3, pp. 635-637.
24. Parsad, B. and Glover, D. (2003) Tenure status of postsecondary instructional faculty and staff: 1992-1998. Education Statistics Quarterly, 4:3
25. Rhoades, G. (2001) Managing productivity in an academic institution: Rethinking the whom, which, what, and whose of productivity. Research in Higher Education, 42:5, pp. 619-632.
26. Sorensen, J., Patterson, A. and Widmayer, A. (1992) Publication productivity of faculty members in criminology and criminal justice doctoral programs. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 3:1, pp. 1-33.
27. Sorensen, J. (1994) Scholarly productivity in criminal justice: Institutional affiliation of authors in the top ten criminal justice journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22:6, pp. 535-547.
28. Steiner, B. and Schwartz, J. (2006) The scholarly productivity of institutions and their faculty in leading criminology and criminal justice journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, pp. 393-400.
29. Steiner, B. and Schwartz, J. (2007) Assessing the quality of doctoral programs in criminology in the United States. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 18:1, pp. 53-86.
30. Weick, A. (1992) Should scholarly productivity be the primary criterion for tenure decisions? No!. Journal of Social Work Education, 28, pp. 135-140.
31. Wright, R. (1995) The most-cited scholars in criminology: A comparison of textbooks and journals. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23:4, pp. 303-311.
32. Wright, R. (1998) The most-cited scholars in criminology and criminal justice textbooks, 1989 to 1993. Justice Professional, 10:3, pp. 309-323.
33. Wright, R. and Friedrichs, D. (1998) The most-cited scholars and works in critical criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 9:2, pp. 211-231.
34. Wright, R. and Soma, C. (1996) The most-cited scholars in criminology textbooks, 1963-1968, 1976-1980, and 1989-1993. Journal of Crime and Justice, 14:1, pp. 45-60.