Health status and health-related quality of life preference-based outcomes of children who are aged 7 to 9 years and have bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment

Pediatrics

Volumn 120, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1044-1052

  Petrou, Stavros ^a   McCann, Donna ^b   Law, Catherine M ^c   Watkin, Peter M ^d   Worsfold, Sarah ^b   Kennedy, Colin R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d WHIPPS CROSS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Health status; Health related quality of life; Hearing impairment; Preferences; Utility scores

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CHILD; COGNITION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMOTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH UTILITIES INDEX MARK III; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH; VISION;

CHILD; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS; HEARING LOSS; HEARING LOSS, BILATERAL; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36048993910     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 02105721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-0159     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Davis A, Wood S. The epidemiology of childhood hearing impairment: factors relevant to planning of services. Br J Audiol. 1992;26:77-90
2. Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1:1-177
3. Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, Homer CJ, Helfand M. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. JAMA. 2001;286:2000-2010
4. Wake M, Hughes EK, Poulakis Z, Collins C, Rickards FW. Outcomes of children with mild to profound hearing congenital hearing loss at 7 to 8 years: a population study. Ear Hear. 2004;25:1-8
5. Allen TE. Patterns of academic achievement among hearing impaired students: 1974 and 1983. In: Schildroth A, Karchmer AM, eds. Deaf Children in America. Boston, MA: College-Hill Press; 1986:161-206
6. Fortnum HM, Marshall DH, Summerfield AQ. Epidemiology of the UK population of hearing-impaired children, including characteristics of those with and without cochlear implants: audiology, aetiology, comorbidity and affluence. Int J Audiol. 2002;41:170-179
7. Brannon JB, Murry T. The spoken syntax of normal, hard-of-hearing, and deaf children. J Speech Hear Res. 1966;9:604-610
8. Davis J. Performance of young hearing-impaired children on a test of basic concepts. J Speech Hear Res. 1974;17:342-351
9. Davis JM, Elfenbein J, Schum R, Bentler RA. Effects of mild and moderate hearing impairments on language, educational, and psychosocial behavior of children. J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;51:53-62
10. Wake M, Hughes EK, Collins CM, Poulakis Z. Parent-reported health-related quality of life in children with congenital hearing loss: a population study. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4:411-417
11. Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CC. Health status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res. 1976;11:478-507
12. Rosser RM, Kind P. A scale of valuations of states of illness: is there a social consensus? Int J Epidemiol. 1978;7:347-358
13. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, Boyle M. Multi-attribute preference functions: Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7:503-520
14. Brooks R. EQ-5D, the current state of play. Health Pol. 1996;37:53-72
15. Apajasalo M, Sintonen C, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J. Quality of life in early adolescence: a sixteen-dimensional health-related measure (16D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:205-211
16. Apajasalo M, Rautonen J, Holmberg C, Sinkkonen J. Quality of life in pre-adolescence: a seventeen-dimensional health-related measure (17D). Qual Life Res. 1996;5:532-538
17. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Atherton Day N. A comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) with four other generic utility instruments. Ann Med. 2001;33:358-370
18. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271-292
19. Cheng AK, Rubin HR, Powe NR, Mellon NK, Francis HW, Niparko JK. Cost-utility analysis of the cochlear implant in children. JAMA. 2000;284:850-856
20. O'Neill C, O'Donoghue GM, Archbold SM, Normand C. A cost utility analysis of paediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:156-160
21. Barton GR, Stacey PC, Fortnum HM, Summerfield AQ. Hearing-impaired children in the United Kingdom: IV. Cost-effectiveness of pediatric cochlear implantation. Ear Hear. 2006;27:575-588
22. Kennedy CR, McCann D, Campbell MJ, et al. Language ability after early detection of permanent childhood hearing impairment. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2131-2141
23. Office for National Statistics. Key Statistics for Postcode Sectors in England and Wales. London, England: Office for National Statistics; 2004
24. Wessex Universal Hearing Screening Trial Group. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Lancet. 1998;352:1957-1964
25. Kennedy C, McCann DC, Campbell MJ, Kimm L, Thornton R. Universal newborn screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment: an 8-year follow-up of a controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;366:660-662
26. Watkin PM, Baldwin M. Confirmation of deafness in infancy. Arch Dis Child. 1999;81:380-389
27. Tucker SM, Bhattacharya J. Screening of hearing impairment in the newborn using the auditory response cradle. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:911-919
28. Bishop DVM. Test for Reception of Grammar. Manchester, United Kingdom: Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, University of Manchester; 1983
29. Dunn, LM, Whetton C, Burley J. British Picture Vocabulary Scale. 2nd ed. Windsor, United Kingdom: NFER-Nelson; 1997
30. Renfrew C. Renfrew Bus Story Manual: A Test of Narrative Speech. 3rd ed. Oxford, England: Renfrew/Winslow; 1995
31. Raven C, Raven JC, Court JH. Manual for Raven's Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford, England: Oxford Psychologists Press Ltd; 1998
32. Furlong WJ, Feeny DH, Torrance GW, Barr RD. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33:375-384
33. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW, et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care. 2002;40:113-128
34. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, et al. Multiplicative Multiattribute Utility Function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) System: A Technical Report. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University; 1998. Working paper 98-11
35. Drummond M. Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Ann Med. 2001;33:344-349
36. Marra CA, Woolcott JC, Kopec JA, et al. A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1571-1582
37. Bailly D, Dechoulydelenclave MB, Lauwerier L. Hearing impairment and psychopathological disorders in children and adolescents: review of the recent literature. Encephale. 2003;29:329-337
38. Schroeder L, Petrou S, Kennedy C, et al. The economic costs of congenital bilateral permanent childhood hearing impairment. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1101-1112
39. Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF Jr, Ghushchyan V. A national catalogue of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the U.S. Med Care. 2005;43:736-749
40. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V. Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:410-420
41. Petrou S. Methodological issues raised by preference-based approaches to measuring the health status of children. Health Econ. 2003;12:697-702
42. Eiser C, Morse R. Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1-156
43. Feeny D, Furlong W, Saigal S, Sun J. Comparing directly measured standard gamble scores to HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores: group- and individual-level comparisons. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:799-809