Confirmation of deafness in infancy

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 380-389

  Watkin, P M ^a   Baldwin, M ^a  

^a WHIPPS CROSS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Confirmation of deafness; Deafness; Screening; Transient evoked oto acoustic emission test

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EVOKED BRAIN STEM AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEWBORN SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY;

EID: 0032711145     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 14682044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.81.5.380     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, Forshaw M, Wright S. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess 1997;1(10);1-196.
2. Tucker SM, Bhattacharya J. Screening hearing impairment in the newborn using the auditory response cradle. Arch Dis Child 1992;67:911-19.
3. Watkin PM. Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;74:F16-25.
4. Watkin PM. Outcomes of neonatal screening for hearing loss by otoacoustic emission. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996;75:F158-68.
5. Watkin PM, Nanor J. The implications for educational services of universal neonatal hearing screening. Deafness and Education 1997;21:19-33.
6. McLellan MS, Webb CH. Ear studies in the newborn infant. J Paediatr 1961;58:523-7.
7. Shurin PA, Pelton SI, Kinkelstein J. Tympanometry in the diagnosis of middle ear effusion. N Engl J Med 1997;24:412-17.
8. El-Refaie A, Parker DJ, Bamford J. Otoacoustic emission versus ABR screening: the effect of external and middle ear abnormalities in a group of SCBU neonates. Br J Audiol 1996;30:3-8.
9. Weatherby LA, Bennett HD. The neonatal acoustic reflex. Scand Audiol 1980;9:103-10.
10. Sutton GJ, Gleadle P, Rowe S. Tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions in a cohort of special care neonates. Br J Audiol 1996;30:9-17.
11. Stapells DR, Oates P. Estimation of the pure tone audiogram by the auditory brainstem response: a review. Audiol Neurootol 1997;2:257-80.
12. Thompson M, Thompson G. Responses of infants and young children as a function of auditory stimuli and test methods. Speech and Hearing Research 1972;15:699.
13. Marchant CD, Shurin PA. Otitis media in the first year of life. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1990;99(suppl 149):33-4.
14. Ewing IR, Ewing AWG. The ascertainment of deafness in infancy and early childhood. J Laryngol Otol 1944;59:309-38.
15. McCormick B. Hearing screening by health visitors: a critical appraisal of the distraction test. Health Visit 1983;56:449-51.
16. Thornton ARD, Kimm L, Kennedy CR, Cafarelli Dees D. External and middle ear factors effecting the interpretation of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 1993;27:319-27.