Identification of uncertainty sources in distributed hydrological modelling: Case study of the Grote Nete catchment in Belgium

Water SA

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 633-642

  Rubarenzya, Mark Henry ^a   Willems, Patrick ^a   Berlamont, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Distributed hydrological models; Grote Nete; MIKE SHE; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; GROTE NETE;

HYDROLOGY;

DECISION THEORY; ERROR ANALYSIS; HYDROLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CATCHMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; MEASUREMENT METHOD;

ANTWERP [BELGIUM]; BELGIUM; BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; FLANDERS; NETHE RIVER; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 36048959827     PISSN: 03784738     EISSN: 18167950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. ADDISCOTT TM (2001) Non-linearity in modelling soil processes. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52 129-138.
2. AMENDOLA A and BUSTAMANTE AS (1988) Reliability Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. ANDREU J, CAPILLA J and SANCHIS E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalised decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. J. Hydrol. 177 269-291.
4. BATELAAN O (2006) Phreatology. Characterising Groundwater Recharge and Discharge Using Remote Sensing, GIS, Ecology, Hydrochemistry, and Groundwater Modelling. Ph.D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
5. BECK MB, RAVETz J R, MULKEY LA and BARNWELL TO (1997) On the problem of model validation for predictive exposure assessments. Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul. 11 229-254.
6. BEVEN KJ (1993) Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Adv. Water Resour. 16 41-51.
7. BEVEN KJ (2000) On model uncertainty, risk and decision making. Hydrol. Proc. 14 2605-2606.
8. BEVEN KJ (2001) Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
9. BEVEN KJ and BINLEY AM (1992) The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol. Proc. 6 265-277.
10. BEVEN KJ and FREER J (2001) Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology. J. Hydrol. 249 (2001) 11-29.
11. BIRKHEAD AL, JAMES CS and KLEYNHANS MT (2007) Hydrological and hydraulic modelling of the Nyl River floodplain. Part 2: Modelling hydraulic behaviour. Water SA 33 (1) 9 -20. http://www.wrc.org.za/downloads/watersa/ 2007/Jan%2007/1996b.pdf
12. BLÖSCHL G and SIVAPALAN M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modelling: a review. In: Kalma JD and. Sivapalan M (eds.) Scale Issues in Hydrological Modelling. Wiley, Chichester. 9-48.
13. BOUMA J (1989) Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Adv. Soil Sci. 9 177-213.
14. BRATTIN W J, BARRY TM and CHIU N (1996) Monte Carlo modeling with risk uncertain probability density functions. Human Ecol. Risk Assess. 2 820-840.
15. BURROUGH PA (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
16. CHAUBEY I, HAAN CT, SALISBURY JM and GRUNWALD S (1999) Quantifying model output uncertainty due to spatial variability of rainfall. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 35 1113-1123.
17. CLARK DJ and SMITHERS JC (2006) Hydrological Decision Support Framework (HSDF) - Initial design. Water SA 32 (4) 465-472. http://www.wrc.org.za/downloads/watersa/2006/Oct%2006/1937.pdf
18. DE KOK JL, ENGELEN G, WHITE R and WIND HG (2001) Modelling land-use change in a decision-support system for coastal-zone management. Environ. Modell. Assess. 6 123-132.
19. DE KORT IAT and BOOIJ MJ (2007) Decision making under uncertainty in a decision support system for the Red River. Environ. Modell. Softw. 22 (2) 128-136.
20. DUBUS IG and BROWN CD (2002) Sensitivity and first step uncertainty analyses for the preferential flow model MACRO. J. Environ. Qual. 31 227-240.
21. DUBUS IG, BROWN CD and BEULKE S (2003) Sources of uncertainty in pesticide fate modelling. Sci. Total Environ. 317 (1-3) 53-72.
22. DUBUS IG and JANSSEN PHM (2003) Issues of replicability in Monte Carlo modelling: a case study with a pesticide leaching model. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22 3081-3087.
23. DUTUIT Y and RAUZY A (2005) Approximate estimation of system reliability via fault trees. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 87 (2) 163-172.
24. GAREN D, WOODWARD D and GETER F (1999) A user agency's view of hydrologic, soil erosion and water quality modelling. Catena 37 277-289.
25. GAUNT JL, RILEY J, STEIN A and PENNING DE VRIES FWT (1997) Requirements for effective modelling strategy. Agric. Syst. 54 153-168.
26. GRAHAM DN and BUTTS MB (2006) Flexible integrated watershed modeling with MIKE SHE. In: VP Singh and DK Frevert (eds.) Watershed Models. Taylor and Francis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
27. GRAYSON RB, MOORE ID and MCHAHON TA (1992) Physically based hydrologic modelling. 1. A terrain-based model for investigative purposes. Water Resour. Res. 28 (10) 2639-2658.
28. HAASL DF (1965) Advanced Concepts in Fault Tree Analysis. Seattle, Washington.
29. HARMS-RINGDAHL L (1993) Safety Analysis. Principles and Practice in Occupational Safety. Elsevier Applied Science, Essex, England.
30. HAVNO K, MADSEN MN and DORGE J (1995) MIKE 11 - A generalised river modelling package. In: VP Singh (ed.) Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology Water Resources Publications, Colorado, USA. 809-846.
31. JAKEMAN AJ, LETCHER RA and NORTON JP (2006) Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 21 (5) 602-614.
32. KAZEZYILMAZ-ALHAN CM, MEDINA JMA and RAO P (2005) On numerical modeling of overland flow. Appl. Math. Comput. 166 (3) 724-740.
33. KRAJEWSKI WF, KRUGER A and NESPOR V (1998) Experimental and numerical studies of small-scale rainfall measurements and variability. Water Sci. Technol. 37 131-138.
34. KUCZERA G and FRANKS SW (2002) Testing hydrologic models: Fortification or falsification? In: VP Singh and DK Frevert (eds.) Mathematical Models of Large Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, LLC, Colorado. 141-186.
35. nd edn.). The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., New York, USA.
36. KUSLER JA and KENTULA ME (1990) Wetland Creation and Restoration: The Status of the Science. Island Press, Washington, DC.
37. MELCHING CS, YEN BC and WENZEL JR HG (1990) A reliability estimation in modelling watershed runoff with uncertainties. Water Resour. Res. 26 2275-2286.
38. MENG FC (2000) Relationships of Fussell-Vesely and Birnbaum importance to structural importance in coherent systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 67 (1) 55-60.
39. MITSCH WJ and WILSON RF (1996) Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time and self-design. J. Appl. Ecol. 6 77-83.
40. MORGAN MG and HENRION M (1990) Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York.
41. MORRIS MD (1991) Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33 161-174.
42. MOWRER HT (2000) Uncertainty in natural resource decision support systems: sources, interpretation and inportance. Comput. Electron. Agric. 27 139-154.
43. MYSIAK J, GIUPPONI C and ROSATO P (2005) Towards the development of a decision support system for water resource management. Environ. Modell. Softw. 20 203-214.
44. NIEHOFF D, FRITSCH U and BRONSTERT A (2002) Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. J. Hydrol. 267 (1-2) 80-93.
45. NOFZIGER DL, CHEN JS and HAAN CT (1994) Evaluating the chemical movement in layered soil model as a tool for assessing risk of pesticide leaching to groundwater. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A - Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental 29 1133-1155.
46. O'HAGAN A (1998) Eliciting expert beliefs in substantial practical applications. The Statistician 47 (1) 21-35.
47. ORESKES N (1998) Evaluation not validation of quantitative models. Environ. Health Perspect. 106 1453-1460.
48. PARENT E and BERNIER J (2003) Encoding prior experts judgments to improve risk analysis of extreme hydrological events via POT modeling. J. Hydrol. 283 (1-4) 1-18.
49. PIETERSEN K (2006) Multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA): A tool to support sustainable management of groundwater resources in South Africa. Water SA 32 (2) 119-128. http://www.wrc.org.za/downloads/watersa/ 2006/April%2006/1764.pdf
50. REED S, KOREN V, SMITH M, ZHANG Z, MOREDA F, SEO DJ, ARNOLD JG, BANDARAGODA C, BINGEMAN A, BRAS R, BUTTS MB, CARPENTER TM, CUI Z, DILUZIO M, GEORGAKAKOS KP, GAUR A, GUO J, GUPTA HV, HOGUE T, IVANOV V, KHODATALAB N, LAN L, LIANG XLD, MITCHELL K, PETERS-LIDARD C, RODRIGUEz E, SEGLENIEKS F, SHAMIR E, TARBOTON D, VIEUX B, VIVONI E and WOODS R (2004) Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. J. Hydrol. 298 27-60.
51. REFSGAARD JC and STORM B (1995) MIKE SHE. In: VP Singh (ed.) Computer Models for Watershed Hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, Colorado, USA. 809-846.
52. RICHARDSON CJ (1994) Ecological functions and human values in wetlands: a framework for assessing forestry impacts. Wetlands 14 1-9.
53. RUBARENZYA MH, WILLEMS P, BERLAMONT J and FEYEN J (2005) Distributed modeling of the Nete catchment (Belgium) for rewetting and extreme event analysis. Proc. OZWATER Watershed Conference. Held from May 8-12, Brisbane, Australia.
54. RUBARENZYA MH, WILLEMS P, BERLAMONT J and FEYEN J (2006a) Application of WETSPRO tool in MIKE SHE model development and testing. The American Society of Civil Engineers. Proc. EWRI World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Held from May 21-25, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
55. RUBARENZYA MH, WILLEMS P, FEYEN J and BERLAMONT J (2006b) Modeling of soil hydraulic properties and base flow in Flanders. The American Society of Civil Engineers. Proc. EWRI World Environmental and Water Resources Congress. Held from May 21-25, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
56. SALTELLI A, CHAN K and SCOTT EM (2000) Sensitivity Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
57. SEIBERT J (1997) Estimation of parameter uncertainty in HBV model. Nord. Hydrol. 28 247-262.
58. SMITH AE, RYAN PB and EVANS JS (1992) The effect of neglecting correlations when propagating uncertainty and estimating the population distribution of risk. Risk Anal. 12 467-474.
59. STINE PA and HUNSAKER CT (2001) An introduction to uncertainty issues for spatial data used in ecological applications. In: MF Goodchild, MA Friedl and TJ Case (eds.) Spatial Uncertainty in Ecology. Springer Verlag, New York. 91-107.
60. TARANTOLA S, GIGLIOLI N, JESINGHAUS J and SALTELLI A (2002) Can global sensitivity analysis steer the implementation of models for environmental assessments and decision-making? Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A. 16 63-76.
61. TIETJE O and TAPKENHINRICHS M (1993) Evaluation of pedotransfer functions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57 1088-1095.
62. TODD J, BROWN EJG and WELLS E (2003) Ecological design applied. Ecol. Eng. 20 421-440.
63. TOL RSJ and DE VOS AF (1998) A Bayesian statistical analysis of the enhanced greenhouse effect. Climate Change 38 87-112.
64. VAN WAGENINGEN A and DU PLESSIS JA (2007) Are rainfall intensities changing, could climate change be blamed and what could be the impact for hydrologists? Water SA 33 (4) 571-574. http://www.wrc.org.za/ downloads/watersa/2007/Jul%2007/2076.pdf .
65. WILLEMS P (2005) Uncertainties in rainfall-runoff modeling. In: JH Lehr and J Keeley (eds.) Water Encyclopedia: Oceanography; Meteorology; Physics and Chemistry; Water Law; and Water History, Art, and Culture. , John Wiley & Sons. 297-303.
66. YANG D, HERATH S and MUSIAKE K (2000) Comparison of different distributed hydrological models for characterisation of catchment spatial variability. Hydrol. Proc. 14 403-416.
67. YAPO PO, GUPTA HV and SOROOSHIAN S (1998) Multi-objective global optimisation for hydrologic models. J. Hydrol. 204 (1-4) 83-97.