Do inbreeding depression and relative male fitness explain the maintenance of androdioecy in white mangrove, Laguncularia racemosa (Combretaceae)?

New Phytologist

Volumn 176, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 891-901

  Landry, Carol L ^a   Rathcke, Beverly J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Androdioecy; Breeding system; Inbreeding depression; Laguncularia racemosa; Male fitness; Pollination; White mangrove

Indexed keywords

ANDRODIOECY; DICOTYLEDON; FITNESS; FRUIT SET; HERMAPHRODITE; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OUTCROSSING; POLLINATION; SEEDLING EMERGENCE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMBRETACEAE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENETICS; INBREEDING; INSECT; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

ANIMALS; COMBRETACEAE; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; INBREEDING; INSECTS; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION;

COMBRETACEAE; LAGUNCULARIA RACEMOSA;

EID: 36048938355     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02228.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akimoto J, Fukuhara T, Kikuzawa K. 1999. Sex ratios and genetic variation in a functionally androdioecious species, Schizopepon bryoniaefolius (Cucurbitaceae). American Journal of Botany 86 : 880 886.
2. Appanah S. 1982. Pollination of androdioecious Xerospermum intermedium Radlk. (Sapindaceae) in a rain forest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 18 : 11 34.
3. Baker HG. 1955. Self-compatibility and establishment after 'long-distance' dispersal. Evolution 9 : 347 348.
4. Charlesworth D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 23 : 333 348.
5. Charlesworth D. 2006. Evolution of plant breeding systems. Current Biology 16 : R726 R735.
6. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist 112 : 975 997.
7. Correll DS, Correll HB. 1982. Flora of the Bahama Archipelago. Vaduz, Liechtenstein : Cramer.
8. Darwin C. 1888. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Facsimile edition, 1986. Chicago, IL, USA : University of Chicago Press.
9. Dommee B, Geslot A, Thompson JD, Reille M, Denelle N. 1999. Androdioecy in the entomophilous tree Fraxinus ornus (Oleaceae). New Phytologist 143 : 419 426.
10. Exell AW. 1931. The genera of Combretaceae. Journal of Botany 69 : 113 128.
11. Harder LD, Barrett SCH. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In : Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York, NY, USA : Chapman & Hall, 140 190.
12. Ishida K, Hiura T. 1998. Pollen fertility and flowering phenology in an androdioecious tree, Fraxinus lanuginosa (Oleaceae), in Hokkaido, Japan. International Journal of Plant Science 159 : 941 947.
13. Kass LB. 2005. An illustrated guide to common plants of San Salvador Island, Bahamas, 2nd edn. San Salvador Island, Bahamas : Gerace Research Center.
14. Kearns CA, Inouye DW. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. Niwot, CO, USA : University Press of Colorado.
15. Landry CL. 2005. Androdioecy in white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa): maintenance of a rare breeding system through plant-pollinator interactions. PhD Thesis. Ann Arbor, MI, USA : University of Michigan.
16. Landry C, Rathcke BJ, Kass LB, Elliott NB, Boothe R. 2005. Flower visitors to white mangrove: a comparison between three Bahamian islands and Florida. In : Buckner S, McGrath T, eds. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on the Natural History of the Bahamas. San Salvador Island, Bahamas : Gerace Research Center, 84 94.
17. Lepart J, Dommee B. 1992. Is Phillyrea angustifolia L. (Oleaceae) an androdioecious species? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 108 : 375 387.
18. Liston A, Rieseberg LH, Elias TS. 1990. Datisca glomerata is functionally androdioecious. Nature 343 : 641 642.
19. Lloyd DG. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in Angiosperms. Genetica 45 : 325 339.
20. Lopez-Almansa JC, Pannell JR, Gil L. 2003. Female sterility in Ulmus minor (Ulmaceae): a hypothesis invoking the cost of sex in a clonal plant. American Journal of Botany 90 : 603 609.
21. Muenchow GE. 1998. Subandrodioecy and male fitness in Sagittaria lancifolia subsp. lancifolia (Alismataceae). American Journal of Botany 85 : 513 520.
22. Pannell J. 1997a. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in a metapopulation. Evolution 51 : 10 20.
23. Pannell J. 1997b. Widespread functional androdioecy in Mercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 61 : 95 116.
24. Pannell J. 1997c. Mixed genetic and environmental sex determination in an androdioecious population of Mercurialis annua. Heredity 78 : 50 56.
25. Pannell JR. 2002. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33 : 397 425.
26. Philbrick CT, Rieseberg LH. 1994. Pollen production in the androdioecious Datisca glomerata (Datiscaceae): implications for breeding system equilibrium. Plant Species Biology 9 : 43 46.
27. Rathcke B, Kass L, Hunt RE. 1996. Preliminary observations on plant reproductive biology in mangrove communities on San Salvador Island, Bahamas. In : Elliott NB, Edwards DC, Godfrey PJ, eds. Proceedings of the Sixth Symposium on the Natural History of the Bahamas. San Salvador Island, Bahamas : Bahamian Field Station, 87 96.
28. Rathcke BJ, Kass LB, Elliott NB. 2001a. Flower visitors to black mangrove and white mangrove on San Salvador Island, Bahamas. In : Clark-Simpson C, Smith G, eds. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on the Natural History of the Bahamas. San Salvador Island, Bahamas : Gerace Research Center, 68 77.
29. Rathcke BJ, Landry CL, Kass LB. 2001b. White mangrove: are males necessary?. In : Clark-Simpson C, Smith G, eds. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium on the Natural History of the Bahamas. San Salvador Island, Bahamas : Gerace Research Center, 89 96.
30. Richards AJ. 1997. Plant breeding systems. New York, NY, USA : Chapman & Hall.
31. Rieseberg LH, Hanson MA, Philbrick CT. 1992. Androdioecy is derived from dioecy in Datiscaceae: evidence from restriction site mapping of PCR amplified chloroplast DNA. Systematic Botany 17 : 324 336.
32. Rieseberg LH, Philbrick CT, Pack PE, Hanson MA, Fritsch P. 1993. Inbreeding depression in androdioecious populations of Datisca glomerata (Datiscaceae). American Journal of Botany 80 : 757 762.
33. Ross MD. 1982. Five evolutionary pathways to subdioecy. American Naturalist 119 : 297 318.
34. Ross MD, Weir BS. 1976. Maintenance of males and females in hermaphrodite populations and the evolution of dioecy. Evolution 30 : 425 441.
35. Snow AA, Spira TP, Simpson R, Klips RA. 1996. The ecology of geitonogamous pollination. In : Lloyd DG, Barrett SCH, eds. Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. New York, NY, USA : Chapman & Hall, 191 216.
36. Spencer SC, Rieseberg LH. 1995. The importance of flowering time and flower number in the relative fitness of males and hermaphrodites in Datisca glomerata (Datiscaceae). Plant Species Biology 10 : 65 69.
37. Tomlinson PB. 1980. The biology of trees native to tropical Florida. Petersham, MA, USA : Published privately.
38. Tomlinson PB. 1994. The Botany of Mangroves. New York, NY, USA : Cambridge University Press.
39. Tomlinson PB. 2001. The Biology of Trees Native to Tropical Florida, 2nd edn. Petersham, MA, USA : Published privately.
40. Traveset A. 1994. Reproductive biology of Phillyrea angustifolia L. (Oleaceae) and effect of galling-insects on its reproductive output. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 114 : 153 166.
41. Vassiliadis C, Valero M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Godelle B. 2000. A model for the evolution of high frequencies of males in an androdioecious plant based on a cross-compatibility advantage of males. Heredity 85 : 413 422.
42. Verdu M, Gonzalez-Martinez SC, Montilla AI, Mateu I, Pannell JR. 2006. Ovule discounting in an outcrossing, cryptically dioecious tree. Evolution 60 : 2056 2063.
43. Willson MF. 1979. Sexual selection in plants. American Naturalist 113 : 777 790.
44. Willson MF. 1983. Plant reproductive ecology. New York, NY, USA : John Wiley and Sons.
45. Wolf DE, Takebayashi N. 2004. Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. American Naturalist 163 : 122 137.
46. Wyatt R. 1983. Pollinator-plant interactions and the evolution of breeding systems. In : Real L, ed. Pollination biology. Orlando, FL, USA : Academic Press, 51 95.