Ovule discounting in an outcrossing, cryptically dioecious tree

Evolution

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 2056-2063

  Verdú, Miguel ^a   González Martínez, Santiago C ^b   Montilla, Ana I ^c   Mateu, Isabel ^c   Pannell, John R ^d  

^a CDIS UV Generalitat Valenciana)   (Spain)

^b INIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Androdioecy; Cryptic dioecy; Mating system; Paternity; Pollination; Spatial genetic structure

Indexed keywords

AUTOGAMY; DECIDUOUS TREE; DIOECY; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC STRUCTURE; HERMAPHRODITE; OUTCROSSING; PATERNITY; POLLEN; REPRODUCTIVE COST;

ARTICLE; FLOWER; FRAXINUS; GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; TREE;

FLOWERS; FRAXINUS; POLLEN; REPRODUCTION; SEEDS; TREES;

FRAXINUS; FRAXINUS ORNUS;

EID: 33751351332     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/06-236.1     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adams, W. T., and J. Burczyk. 2000. Magnitude and implications of gene flow in gene conservation reserves. Pp. 215-224 in T. Boyle, D. Boshier, and A. Young, eds. Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood VIC, Australia.
2. Anderson, G. J., and D. E. Symon. 1989. Functional dioecy and andromonoecy in Solanum. Evolution 43:204-219.
3. Bacles, C. F. E., J. Burczyk, A. J. Lowe, and R. A. Ennos. 2005. Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution 59:979-990.
4. Brunet, J., and H. R. Sweet. 2006. Impact of insect pollinator group and floral display size on outcrossing rate. Evolution 60:234-246.
5. Burczyk, J., W. T. Adams, and J. Shimizu. 1996. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a natural knobcone pine (Pinus attenuata Lemmon.) stand. Heredity 77:251-260.
6. Burczyk, J., W. T. Adams, G. F. Moran, and A. R. Griffin. 2002. Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Mol. Ecol. 11:2379-2391.
7. Cane, J. H. 1993. Reproductive role of sterile pollen in cryptically dioecious species of flowering plants. Cur. Sci. (Bangalore) 65:223-225.
8. Charlesworth, D. 1984. Androdioecy and the evolution of dioecy. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 23:333-348.
9. Charlesworth, D., and B. Charlesworth. 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 112:975-997.
10. Charlesworth, D., M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth. 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of out-crossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution 44:1469-1489.
11. Dommée, B., A. Geslot, J. D. Thompson, M. Reille, and N. Denelle. 1999. Androdioecy in the entomophilous tree Fraxinus ornus (Oleaceae). New Phytol. 143:419-426.
12. Doyle, J. J., and J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small amounts of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19:11-15.
13. Dunthorn, M. 2004. Cryptic dioecy in Mammea (Clusiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 249:191-196.
14. Eckert, C. G. 2000. Contributions of autogamy and geitonogamy to self-fertilization in a mass-flowering, clonal plant. Ecology 81:532-542.
15. Ennos, R. 2001. Inferences about spatial processes in plant populations from the analysis of molecular markers. Pp. 45-71 in J. Silvertown and J. Antonovics, eds. Integrating ecology and evolution in a spatial context. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
16. Epperson, B. K. 1993. Recent advances in correlation analysis of spatial patterns of genetic variation. Evol. Biol. 27:95-155.
17. Harder, L. D., and S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373:512-515.
18. Harder, L. D., and W. G. Wilson. 1998. A clarification of pollen discounting and its joint effects with inbreeding depression on mating system evolution. Am. Nat. 152:684-695.
19. Hardy, O. J., S. C. González-Martínez, B. Colas, H. Fréville, A. Mignot, and I. Olivieri. 2004. Fine-scale genetic structure and gene dispersal in Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). II. Correlated paternity within and among sibships. Genetics 168:1601-1614.
20. Hardy, O. J., and X. Vekemans. 2002. SPAGEDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2:618-620.
21. Herlihy, C. R., and C. G. Eckert. 2002. Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant. Nature 416:320-323.
22. Heuertz, M., J. F. Hausman, I. Tsvetkov, N. Frascaria-Lacoste, and X. Vekemans. 2001. Assessment of genetic structure within and among Bulgarian populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Mol. Ecol. 10:1615-1623.
23. Ihaka, R., and R. Gentleman. 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5:299-314.
24. Jamieson, A., and S. S. Taylor. 1997. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. Anim. Genet. 28:397-400.
25. Laguna, E., and M. García. 1988. El parque natural del carrascal de la Font-Roja. Vida silvestre 63:42-48.
26. Lande, R., and D. W. Schemske. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution 39:24-40.
27. Lande, R., D. W. Schemske, and S. T. Schultz. 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution 48:965-978.
28. Lefort, F., S. Brachet, N. Frascaria-Lacoste, K. J. Edwards, and G. C. Douglas. 1999. Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and their conservation in the olive family (Oleaceae). Mol. Ecol. 8:1088-1090.
29. Lepart, J., and B. Dommée. 1992. Is Phillyrea angustifolia L. (Oleaceae) an androdioecious species? Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 108:375-387.
30. Lloyd, D. G. 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica 45:325-339.
31. _. 1980. Sexual strategies in plants. III. A quantitative method for describing the gender of plants. New Z. J. Bot. 18:103-108.
32. _. 1992. Self- and cross-fertilization in plants. II. The selection of self-fertilization. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153:370-380.
33. Loiselle, B. A., V. L. Sork, J. Nason, and C. Graham. 1995. Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understorey shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 82:1420-1425.
34. Mayer, S. S., and D. Charlesworth. 1991. Cryptic dioecy in flowering plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:320-325.
35. Morgan, M. T., and J. K. Conner. 2001. Using genetic markers to directly estimate male selection gradients. Evolution 55:272-281.
36. Nagylaki, T. 1976. A model for the evolution of self-fertilization and vegetative reproduction. J. Theor. Biol. 58:55-58.
37. Nielsen, R., D. K. Mattila, P. J. Clapham, and P. J. Palsboll. 2001. Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the North Atlantic humpback whale. Genetics 157:1673-1682.
38. Pannell, J. R. 2002a. The evolution and maintenance of androdioecy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:397-425.
39. _. 2002b. What is functional androdioecy? Func. Ecol. 16:858-869.
40. Pannell, J. R., and F. Ojeda. 2000. Patterns of flowering and sexratio variation in the Mediterranean shrub Phillyrea angustifolia (Oleaceae): implications for the maintenance of males with hermaphrodites. Ecol. Lett. 3:495-502.
41. Porcher, E., and R. Lande. 2005. Reproductive compensation in the evolution of plant mating systems. New Phytol. 166:673-684.
42. Ritland, K. 1988. The genetic mating structure of subdivided populations. 2. Correlated mating models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 34:320-346.
43. _. 2002. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci. Heredity 88:221-228.
44. Roeder, K., B. Devlin, and B. G. Lindsay. 1989. Application of maximum-likelihood methods to population genetic data for the estimation of individual fertilities. Biometrics 45:363-379.
45. Schemske, D. W., and R. Lande. 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants: II. Empirical observations. Evolution 39:41-52.
46. Schoen, D. J., M. T. Morgan, and T. Bataillon. 1996. How does self-pollination evolve? Inferences from floral ecology and molecular genetic variation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351:1281-1290.
47. Signorovitch, J., and R. Nielsen. 2002. PATRI - paternity inference using genetic data. Bioinformatics 18:341-342.
48. Smouse, P. E., and T. R. Meagher. 1994. Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics 136:313-322.
49. Smouse, P. E., T. R. Meagher, and C. J. Kobak. 1999. Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have disproportionate reproductive contributions. J. Evol. Biol. 12:1069-1077.
50. Smouse, P. E., and V. L. Sork. 2004. Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches. For. Ecol. Manag. 197:21-38.
51. Vassiliadis, C., M. Valero, P. Saumitou-Laprade, and B. Godelle. 2000. A model for the evolution of high frequencies of males in an androdioecious plant based on a cross-compatibility advantage of males. Heredity 85:413-422.
52. Vassiliadis, C., P. Saumitou-Laprade, J. Lepart, and F. Viard. 2002. High male reproductive success of hermaphrodites in the androdioecious Phillyrea angustifolia. Evolution 56:1362-1373.
53. Vekemans, X., and O. J. Hardy. 2004. New insights from fine-scale spatial genetic structure analyses in plant populations. Mol. Ecol. 13:921-935.
54. Verdú, M. 2004. Physiological and reproductive differences between hermaphrodites and males in the androdioecious plant Fraxinus ornus. Oikos 105:239-246.
55. Verdú, M., A. I. Montilla, and J. R. Pannell. 2004. Paternal effects on functional gender account for cryptic dioecy in a perennial plant. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:2017-2023.
56. Vogler, D. W., and S. Kalisz. 2001. Sex among the flowers: the distribution of plant mating systems. Evolution 55:202-204.
57. Wallander, E. 2001. Evolution of wind pollination in Fraxinus (Oleaceae): an ecophylogenetic approach. Botanical Institute, Göteborg University, Goteburg, Sweden.
58. Weeks, S. C. 2004. Seven generations of inbreeding does not purge inbreeding depression in the clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. J. Evol. Biol. 17:475-484.
59. Weeks, S. C., B. R. Crosser, and M. M. Gray. 2001. Relative fitness of two hermaphroditic mating types in the androdioecious clam shrimp, Eulimnadia texana. J. Evol. Biol. 14:83-94.
60. Wolf, D. E., and N. Takebayashi. 2004. Pollen limitation and the evolution of androdioecy from dioecy. Am. Nat. 163:122-137.
61. Wright, J. W., and T. R. Meagher. 2004. Selection on floral characters in natural Spanish populations of Silene latifolia. J. Evol. Biol. 17:382-395.