Critical and sensitive periods for reversing the effects of mechanosensory deprivation on behavior, nervous system, and development in Caenorhabditis elegans

Developmental Neurobiology

Volumn 67, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1443-1456

  Rai, Susan ^a   Rankin, Catharine H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Activity dependent plasticity; Caenorhabditis elegans; Critical periods; Glutamate; Sensitive periods

Indexed keywords

GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR; POSTSYNAPTIC RECEPTOR; RECEPTOR SUBUNIT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; HATCHING; INTERNEURON; LARVA; MECHANICAL STIMULATION; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PRESYNAPTIC MEMBRANE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SENSORY NERVE CELL; SENSORY STIMULATION; SYNAPSE VESICLE;

AGING; ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CRITICAL PERIOD (PSYCHOLOGY); LARVA; MECHANORECEPTORS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PRESYNAPTIC TERMINALS; RECEPTORS, GLUTAMATE; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SYNAPSES; SYNAPTIC VESICLES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 35948995278     PISSN: 19328451     EISSN: 1932846X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20522     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Brenner S. 1974. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77:71-94.
2. Chalfie M, Sulston J, White JG, Southgate E, Thompson JN, Brenner S. 1985. The neural circuit for touch sensitivity in C. elegans. J Neurosci 5:956-964.
3. Derkach VA, Oh MC, Guire ES, Soderling TR. 2007. Regulatory mechanisms of AMPA receptors in synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:101-113.
4. Ebrahimi CM, Rankin CH. 2007. Early patterned stimulation produces changes in adult behavior and gene expression in C. elegans. Genes Behav. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2006.00278.x.
5. Fujiwara M, Sengupta P, McIntire SL. 2002. Regulation of body size and behavioral state of C. elegans by sensory perception and the EGL-4 cGMP-dependent protein kinase. Neuron 36:1091-1102.
6. Gonzalez A, Lovic V, Ward GR, Wainwright PE, Fleming AS. 2001. Intergenerational effects of complete maternal deprivation and replacement stimulation on maternal behavior and emotionality in female rats. Dev Psychobiol 38:11-32.
7. Heisenberg M, Heusipp M, Wanke C. 1995. Structural plasticity in the Drosophila brain. J Neurosci 15:1951-1960.
8. Hoet JJ, Hanson MA. 1999. Intrauterine nutrition: Its importance during critical periods for cardiovascular and endocrine development. J Physiol 514:617-627.
9. Kay LM, Laurent G. 1999. Odor-and context-dependent modulation of mitral cell activity in behaving rats. Nat Neurosci 2:1003-1009.
10. Klose MK, Robsertson RM. 2004. Stress-induced thermo-protection of neuromuscular transmission. Integr Comp Biol 44:14-20.
11. Krimm RF, Hill DL. 1997. Early prenatal critical periods for chorda tympani nerve terminal field development. J Comp Neurol 378:254-264.
12. Lorenz K. 1957. The past 12 years in comparative behaviour. In: Shiller CH, editor. Instinctive behaviour: The development of a modern concept. New York: International Universities Press, pp 83-128.
13. Lovic V, Fleming AS. 2004. Artificially-reared female rats show reduced prepulse inhibition and deficits in the attentional set shifting task-reversal of effects with maternallike licking stimulation. Behav Brain Res 148:209-219.
14. Malinow R, Malenka RC. 2002. AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Ann Rev Neurosci 25:103-126.
15. Meaney M. 2001. Maternal care, gene expression and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Ann Rev Neurosci 24:1161-1192.
16. Nonet M. 1999. Visualization of synaptic specialization in live C. elegans with synaptic vesicle protein-GFP fusions. J Neurosci Methods 89:33-40.
17. Perry BD. 2002. Childhood experience and the expression of genetic potential: What childhood neglect tells us about nature and nurture. Brain Mind 3:79-100.
18. Rongo C, Kaplan JM. 1999. CaMKII regulates the density of central glutamatergic synapses in vivo. Nature 402:195-199.
19. Rongo C, Whitfield CW, Rodal A, Kim S, Kaplan JM. 1998. LIN-10 is a shared component of the polarized protein localization pathways in neurons and epithelia. Cell 94:751-759.
20. Rose JK, Kaun KR, Rankin CH. 2003. Glutamate receptor trafficking underlies long-term memory in C. elegans. J Neurosci 23:9595-9600.
21. Rose JK, Rankin CH. 2006. Blocking memory reconsolidation reverses a cellular mechanism of memory. J Neurosci 26:11582-11587.
22. Rose JK, Sangha S, Rai S, Norman K, Rankin CH. 2005. Decreased sensory stimulation reduces behavioural responding, retards development and alters neuronal connectivity in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci 25:7159-7168.
23. Schanburg SM, Field TM. 1987. Sensory deprivation stress and supplemental stimulation in the rat pup and preterm human neonate. Child Dev 58:1431-1447.
24. Sulston JE, Horvitz HR. 1977. Post-embryonic cell lineages of the nematode Caenrhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 56:110-156.
25. Takahashi T, Svoboda K, Malinow R. 2003. Experience strengthening transmission by driving AMPA receptors into synapses. Science 299:1585-1588.
26. Turner A, Greenough W. 1985. Differential rearing effects on the rat visual cortex synapses. Brain Res 329:195-203.
27. Volkmar F, Greenough W. 1972. Rearing complexity affects branching of dendrites in the visual cortex of the rat. Science 176:1145-1147.
28. White JB, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. 1986. The structure of the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 314:1-340.