Article missed published papers on GPAQ validity [3]

British Journal of General Practice

Volumn 57, Issue 544, 2007, Pages 918-

  Roland, Martin ^a   Bower, Peter ^a   Mead, Nicki ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b NPCRDC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; DEMOGRAPHY; GENERAL PRACTICE; LETTER; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN; PREDICTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 35948962009     PISSN: 09601643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3399/096016407782317919     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Hankins M, Fraser A, Hodson A, et al. Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57: 737-740.
2. Campbell S, Hann M, Hacker J, et al. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 2001; 323(7316): 784-787.
3. Bower P, Roland M, Campbell J, Mead N. Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey. BMJ 2003; 326(7383): 258.
4. Campbell J, Ramsay J, Green J. Age, gender, socioeconomic. and ethnic differences in patiens' assessments of primary health care. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(2): 90-95.
5. Chantler C, Ashmore S, Mandair S. Improving the patient experience in general practice with the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ). Quality in Primary Care 2005; 13(4): 225-232.
6. Safran DG Montgomery J, Chang H, et al. Switching doctors: predictors of voluntary disenrollment for a primary physician's practice. J Fam Pract 2001; 50(2): 130-136.