Setting standards based on patients' views on access and continuity: Secondary analysis of data from the general practice assessment survey

British Medical Journal

Volumn 326, Issue 7383, 2003, Pages 258-260

  Bower, Peter ^a   Roland, Martin ^a   Campbell, John ^b   Mead, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b PENINSULA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; EXPERIENCE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; MONITORING; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SATISFACTION; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; APPOINTMENTS AND SCHEDULES; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; FAMILY PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; STATE MEDICINE; TIME FACTORS; WAITING LISTS;

EID: 0037309957     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. NHS Executive. A first class service: quality in the new NHS. London: Stationery Office, 1998.
2. Williamson C. Consumer and professional standards: working towards consensus. Qual Health Care 2000;9:190-4.
3. NHS Executive. National survey of NHS patients. London: Stationery Office, 1999.
4. Secretary of State for Health. The NHS plan. London: Stationery Office, 2000.
5. Ramsay J, Campbell J, Schroter S, Green J, Roland M. The general practice assessment survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties. Fam Pract 2000;17:372-9.
6. Roland M. General practice assessment survey (GPAS-2) manual. Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, 2002.
7. Campbell S, Hann M, Hacker J, Burns C, Oliver D, Thapar A, et al. Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 2001;323:784-7.
8. The PMS National Evaluation Team. National evaluation of first wave NHS personal medical services pilots. Manchester: National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester. 2000.
9. Bower P, Mead N, Roland M. What dimensions underlie patient responses to the general practice assessment survey? A factor analytic study. Fam Pract 2002;19:489-95.
10. Bamford C, Jacoby A. Development of patient satisfaction questionnaires. I: Methodological issues. Qual Health Care 1992;1:153-7.
11. Salisbury C, Manku-Scott T, Moore L, Chalder M, Sharp D. Questionnaire survey of users of NHS walk-in centres. Br J Gen Pract 2002;52:554-60.
12. Wensing M, Jung H, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1573-88.
13. Campbell S, Roland M, Buetow S. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:1611-25.
14. Grol R, Wensing M. Patients evaluate general/family practice: the EUROPEP instrument. Nijmegen: Centre for Quality of Care Research, 2000.
15. Smith C, Armstrong D. Comparison of criteria derived by government and patients for evaluating general practitioner services. BMJ 1989;299:494-6.
16. Gulliford M, Figueroa-Munoz J, Morgan M, Hughes D, Gibson B, Beech R, et al. What does 'access to health care' mean? J Health Serv Res Policy 2002;7:186-8.