Antepartum fetal surveillance and timing of delivery in the pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1007-1013

  Graves, Cornelia R ^a  

^a Baptist Hospital Nashville   (United States)

Author keywords

Antepartum fetal testing; Nonstress test; Stillbirth

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DELIVERY; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS MONITORING; FETUS RISK; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PRENATAL CARE; RISK ASSESSMENT; STILLBIRTH; TREATMENT PLANNING;

CESAREAN SECTION; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; FETAL DISTRESS; FETAL MONITORING; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; LABOR, INDUCED; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN DIABETICS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; TIME FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 35848941909     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31815a63cc     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Siddiqui F, James D. Fetal monitoring in type 1 diabetic pregnancies. Early Hum Develop. 2003;72:1-13.
2. Bjork O, Persson B. Villous structure in different parts of the cotyledon in placentas of insulin-dependent diabetic women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1984;63:37-43.
3. Nylund L, Lunell NO, Lewande R, et al. Utero placental blood flow in diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:298-302.
4. Shelly JH, Bassett JM, Milner RD. Control of carbohydrate metabolism in the fetus and newborn. Br Med Bull. 1975;31:37.
5. Salvers DR, Brudenell MJ, Nicolaides KH. Fetal polycythemia and thrombocytopenia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1987.
6. Teramo K, Kuusisito AN, Raivio KO. Perinatal outcome of insulin dependent diabetic pregnancies. Ann Clin Res. 1979;11:146.
7. Jazayeri A, O'Brien WF, Tsibris JC, et al. Are maternal diabetes and preeclampsia independent stimulators of erythropoietin production? Am J Perinatol. 1998;15:577-580.
8. Hay WW, DiGiarcomo JE, Meznarich HK, et al. Effect of glucose and insulin on fetal glucose oxidation and oxygen consumption. Am J Physiol. 1989;256:704-713.
9. Hay WW, DiGiarcomo JE, Milner RDG. Control of carbohydrate metabolism in the fetus and newborn. Br Med Bull. 1975;31:31-43.
10. Karlsson K, Kjellmer I. The outcome of diabetic pregnancies in relation to the mother's blood sugar level. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:213.
11. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes on pregnancy outcomes. NEJM. 2005;352:2477-2486.
12. Carson BS, Phillips AF, Simmons MA, et al. The effects of sustained insulin infusion upon glucose uptake and oxygenation of the ovine fetus. Pediatr Res. 1980;14:147.
13. Landon MB, Vickers S. Fetal surveillance in pregnancy complicated by diabetes mellitus: is it necessary? J Mat Fet Neonat Med. 2002;12:413-416.
14. Platt MJ, Stanisstreet M, Casson IF, et al. St. Vincent's declaration 10 years on: outcomes of diabetic pregnancies. Diabetes Med. 2002;19:216.
15. Reece EA, Sivan E, Francis G, et al. Pregnancy outcomes among women with and without diabetic microvascular disease versus non-diabetic controls. Am J Perinatol. 1998;15:549.
16. Albert TJ, Landon MB, Wheller JJ, et al. Prenatal detection of fetal anomalies in pregnancies complicated by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:1424-1428.
17. Seeds JW, Peng TC. Does segmented growth impose an increased risk of fetal death? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:316-323.
18. O'Reilly-Green C, Divon MY. Sonographic and clinical diagnosis of macrosomia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2000;43:309-315.
19. Miller RF, Johnson EB, Devine P. Sonographic "fetal symmetry" predicts shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;193:S45.
20. Jazayeri A, Heffron JA, Phillips R, et al. Macrosomia prediction using ultrasound fetal abdominal circumference of 35 cm or more. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:523-526.
21. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antepartum fetal surveillance. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Report No. 9. Washington, DC, 1999.
22. Roberts AB, Stubbs SM, Mooney R, et al. Fetal activity in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:845-849.
23. Vintzileos AM. Antenatal assessment for the detection of fetal asphyxia: an evidence-based approach using indication-specific testing. Ann N York Acad Sci. 2000;900:137-150.
24. Landon MB, Gabbe SG, Sachs L. Management of diabetes mellitus in pregnancy: a survey of obstetricians and maternal-fetal specialists. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:635.
25. Barrett JM, Salyer SL, Boehm FH. The non-stress test: as evaluation of 1000 patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;141:153.
26. Devoe LD, Jones CR. Nonstress test: evidence-based use in high-risk pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45:986-992.
27. Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L, et al. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile score. Is J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;135:511.
28. Miller DA, Rabello YA, Paul RH. The modified biophysical profile. Antepartum testing in the 1990's. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:812.
29. Golde SH, Montero M, Good-Anderson B, et al. The role of the non-stress test, fetal biophysical profile and CSTs in the outpatient management of insulin-requiring diabetic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:369.
30. Dicker D, Feldberg D, Yeshiva A, et al. Fetal surveillance in insulin dependent diabetic pregnancy: predictive value of the biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;150:800-804.
31. Salvesen DR, Freeman J, Brudnell JM, et al. Prediction of fetal acidaemia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus by biophysical profile and fetal heart rate monitoring. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:227-233.
32. Johnson JM, Lange IR, Harman CR, et al. Biophysical profile scoring in the management of the diabetic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:841-846.
33. Kjos SL, Leung A, Henry OA. Antepartum surveillance in diabetic pregnancies: predictors of fetal distress in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1532-1539.
34. Gabbe SG, Graves CR. Management of diabetes mellitus complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:857-868.
35. Wong SF, Chan FY, Cincotta RB, et al. Use of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in the monitoring of pregnancy in women with preexisting diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;43:302-306.
36. Bracero LA, Figueroa R, Byrne DW. Comparison of umbilical Doppler velocimetry, non-stress testing and biophysical profile in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. J Ultrasound Med. 1996;15:301-308.
37. Pietryga M, Brazer J, Wender-Ozegowska E, et al. Placental Doppler velocimetry in gestational diabetes mellitus. J Perinatol Med. 2006;34:108-110.
38. Kjos SL, Henry OA, Montero M, et al. Insulin requiring diabetes in pregnancy. A randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:611.
39. Hodor JG, Poggi SJ, Spong CY, et al. Risk of third-trimester amniocentesis: a case-control study. Amer J Perinatol. 2006;23:177-180.
40. Lurie S, Matzkel A, Weissman A, et al. Outcome of pregnancy in class A1 and A2 gestational diabetic patients delivered beyond 40 weeks gestation. Am J Perinatol. 1992;9:484.
41. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist. Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus. ACOG Practice Bulletin Report No. 60. Washington, DC: 2005.
42. Gonen R, Bader D, Ajami M. Effects of a policy of elective cesarean delivery in cases of fetal macrosomia on the incidence of brachial plexus injury and the rate of cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1296.
43. Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, et al. Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:183.
44. Girz BA, Divon MY, Merkatz IR. Sudden fetal death in women with well controlled intensively monitored gestational diabetes. J Perinatol. 1992;12:229-233.
45. Sanchez-Ramos L, Bernstein S, Kaunitz AM. Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:997-1002.