The modified biophysical profile: Antepartum testing in the 1990s

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 174, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 812-817

  Miller, D A ^a   Rabello, Y A ^a   Paul, R H ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES   (United States)

Author keywords

Antepartum testing; false negative rate; false positive rate; modified biophysical profile

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; FETUS; FETUS DEATH; FETUS GROWTH; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; NEWBORN CARE; PERINATAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL RATE; WELLBEING;

EID: 0029881218     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70305-8     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. FA Manning I Morrison I Lange Fetal assessment based upon fetal BPP scoring: experience in 12,620 referred high-risk pregnancies. I. Perinatal mortality by frequency and etiology AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 151 1985 343 350
2. SL Clark P Sabey K. Jolley Nonstress testing with acoustic stimulation and amniotic fluid assessment: 5973 tests without unexpected fetal death AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 160 1989 694 697
3. RK Freeman G Anderson W. Dorchester A prospective multiinstitutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. II. Contraction stress test versus nonstress test for primary surveillance AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 143 1982 778 781
4. JP Nageotte CV Towers T Asrat RK. Freeman Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 170 1994 1672 1676
5. FA Manning LD Platt L. Sipos Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile score AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 136 1980 787 795
6. RL Williams RK Creasy GC Cunningham Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California Obstet Gynecol 59 1982 624 632