Comparison of umbilical Doppler velocimetry, nonstress testing, and biophysical profile in pregnancies complicated by diabetes

Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 301-308

  Bracero, Luis A ^a   Figueroa, Reinaldo ^b   Byrne, Daniel W ^b   Han, Hye J ^b  

^a MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Biophysical profile; Diabetes mellitus; Doppler velocimetry; Nonstress testing; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS MONITORING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; UMBILICAL ARTERY;

EID: 0029979604     PISSN: 02784297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7863/jum.1996.15.4.301     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Keegan KA, Paul RH: Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. IV. The nonstress test as a primary approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136:75, 1980
2. Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L: Antepartum fetal evaluation: Development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136:787, 1980
3. Bracero L, Schulman H, Fleischer A, et al: Umbilical artery velocimetry in diabetes and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 68:654, 1986
4. Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH: A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:555, 1976
5. Norusis MJ: SPSS/PC+ (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) [computer program], MS-DOS version. SPSS Inc., 444 N. Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois
6. Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S: Applied logistic regression. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 1989, p 108
7. Trudinger BJ, Cook CM, Jones L, et al: A comparison of fetal heart rate monitoring and umbilical artery waveforms in the recognition of fetal compromise. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93:171, 1986
8. Devoe LD, Gardner P, Dear C, et al: The diagnostic values of concurrent nonstress testing, amniotic fluid measurement, and Doppler velocimetry in screening a general high risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 163:1040, 1990
9. Lowery CL, Henson BV, Wan J, et al: A comparison between umbilical artery velocimetry and standard antepartum surveillance in hospitalized high risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:710, 1990
10. Arduini D, Rizzo G, Romanini C: Changes of pulsatility index from fetal vessels preceding the onset of late decelerations in growth retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 79:605, 1992
11. Bekedam DJ, Visser GHA, Vander Zee AGJ, et al: Abnormal umbilical artery waveform patterns in growth retarded fetus: Relationship to antepartum late heart rate decelerations and outcome. Early Hum Dev 24:79, 1990
12. Devoe LD, Castillo RA, Sherline DM: The nonstress test as a diagnostic test: A critical reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152:1047, 1985
13. Almstrom H, Axelsson O, Cnattingius S, et al: Comparison of umbilical-artery velocimetry and cardiocography for surveillance of small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Lancet 340:936, 1992