A comparison of one-high-threshold and two-high-threshold multinomial models of source monitoring

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 279-290

  Menon, Mahesh ^a,b   Woodward, Todd S ^a,c  

^a RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b CENTRE FOR ADDICTION AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Canada)

^c SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Data simulation; Multinomial modeling; Source monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 35848940353     PISSN: 15389472     EISSN: 15389472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1177993500     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
2. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
3. Batchelder, W. H., Riefer, D. M., & Hu, X. G. (1994). Measuring memory factors in source monitoring - reply to kinchla. Psychological Review, 101, 172-176.
4. Bayen, U. J., Murname, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source monitoring, item detection and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
5. Brebion, G., Gorman, J. M., Amador, X., Malaspina, D., & Sharif, Z. (2002). Source monitoring impairments in schizophrenia: Characterisation and associations with positive and negative symptomatology. Psychiatry Research, 112(1), 27-39.
6. Dodson, C. S., Prinzmetal, W., & Shimamura, A. P. (1998). Using excel to estimate parameters from observed data: An example from source memory data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 517-526.
7. Hoffman, H. G. (1997). Role of memory strength in reality monitoring decisions: Evidence from source attribution biases. Journal of experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23(2), 371-383.
8. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114(1), 3-28.
9. Keefe, R. S. E., Arnold, M. C., Bayen, U. J., McEvoy, J. P., & Wilson, W. H. (2002). Source-monitoring deficits for self-generated stimuli in schizophrenia: Multinomial modeling of data from three sources. Schizophrenia Research, 57(1), 51-67.
10. Lindsay, D. S., Johnson, M. K., & Kwon, P. (1991). Developmental changes in memory source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 52, 297-318.
11. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95(3), 318-339.
13. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. (1991). Statistical inference for multinomial processing tree models. In J.-P. Doignon & J.-C. Falmange (Eds.), Mathematical psychology: Current developments. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Riefer, D. M., Hu, X. G., & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Response strategies in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(3), 680-693.
15. Thomas, J. P., & Olzak, L.A. (1992). Simultaneous detection and identification. In F. G. Ashby (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 253-277). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Woodward, T. S., Menon, M., & Whitman, J. C. (in press). Multinomial modelling of source monitoring biases associated with hallucinations and delusions in schizophrenia.
17. Woodward TS, Menon M, Hu X, Keefe RSE. (2006). Optimization of a multinomial model for investigations of hallucinations and delusions with source monitoring. Schizophrenia Research, 85, 106-112.