Memory for intention-related material presented in a to-be-ignored channel

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1197-1204

  Marsh, Richard L ^a,d   Cook, Gabriel I ^b   Meeks, J Thadeus ^a   Clark Foos, Arlo ^a   Hicks, Jason L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AUDITORY MEMORY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 35748979707     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193593     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AARTS, H., DUKSTERHUIS, A., & DE VRIES, P. (2001 ). On the psychology of drinking: Being thirsty and perceptually ready. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 631-642.
2. ANDERSON, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. ANDERSON, J. R., BOTHELL, D., BYRNE, M. D., DOUGLASS, S., LEBIERE, C., & QIN, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060.
4. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80, 1-46.
5. BROADBENT, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon.
6. BRUNER, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
7. CHERRY, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979.
8. COOK, G. I., MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (2007). The nature of categorical cues in event-based prospective memory tasks. Unpublished manuscript.
9. COWAN, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., THOMAS, R., MAYFIELD, S., SHANK, H., MORRISETTE, N., & BRENEISER, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327-342.
11. EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., WILLIFORD, C. L., PAGAN, J. L., & DISMUKES, R. K. (2003). Forgetting of intentions in demanding situations is rapid. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 147-162.
12. ELLIS, J., & MILNE, A. (1996). Retrieval cue specificity and the realization of delayed intentions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 862-887.
13. GOSCHKE, T., & KUHL, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
14. GOSCHKE, T., & KUHL, J. (1996). Remembering what to do: Explicit and implicit memory for intentions. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 53-91). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. HICKS, J. L., COOK, G. I., & MARSH, R. L. (2005). Detecting event-based prospective memory occurring within and outside the focus of attention. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 1-11.
16. JAMES, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
17. KAHNEMAN, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. LACHTER, J., FORSTER, K. I., & RUTHRUFF, E. (2004). Forty-five years after Broadbent (1958): Still no identification without attention. Psychological Review, 111, 880-913.
19. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & BINK, M. L. (1998). The activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 350-361.
20. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & BRYAN, E. S. (1999). The activation of unrelated and cancelled intentions. Memory & Cognition, 27, 320-327.
21. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & COOK, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 68-75.
22. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & COOK, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling mem. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1037-1045.
23. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & WATSON, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 652-659.
24. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
25. MCDANIEL, M. A., GUYNN, M. J., EINSTEIN, G. O., & BRENEISER, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 30, 605-614.
26. MCGANN, D., ELLIS, J., & MILNE, A. (2003). Conceptual and perceptual processing in prospective remembering. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15, 19-41.
27. MEYER, D. E., & SCHVANENELDT, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
28. NELSON, D. L., MCEVOY, C. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Available at www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation.
29. NORMAN, D. A., & BOBROW, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 44-64.
30. PASHLER, H. E. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. PASHLER, H. [E.], JOHNSTON, J. C., & RUTHRUFF, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651.
32. SCHIFF, W. (1980). Perception: An applied approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
33. SHIFFRIN, R. M., & SCHNEIDER, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
34. TREISMAN, A. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242-248.