Development of a performance evaluation database for concrete bridge components and systems under simulated seismic loads

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 413-442

  Hose, Yael ^a   Silva, Pedro ^a   Seible, Frieder ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC LOADS; EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

MULTI-LEVEL DESIGN METHOD;

CONCRETE BRIDGES;

EID: 0034187212     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.1586119     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. FEMA 273, 1997, NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, October.
2. FEMA 274, 1997, NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 274, Federal Emergency Management Agency, October.
3. FEMA 306, 1999, Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings: basic procedures manual, FEMA 306, Federal Emergency Management Agency, May.
4. Hose, Y. D., Seible, F., and Priestley, M.J.N., 1997, Strategic relocation of plastic hinges in bridge columns, Structural Systems Research Project, 97/05, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, September.
5. Hose, Y. D., Silva, P., and Seible, F., 1999, Performance library of concrete bridge components, sub-assemblages, and systems under simulated seismic loads, Structural Systems Research Program, SSRP 99/08, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, January.
6. Kawashima, K. and Unjoh, S., 1997, The 1996 seismic design specifications of highway bridges, Workshop on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers in Transportation Facilities, Buffalo, New York, 299-321.
7. Kowalsky, M. J., 1997, Direct displacement-based design: a seismic design methodology and its application to concrete bridges, Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction cf the requirements in Structural Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, 427 pp.
8. Krawinkler, H., 1995, New trends in seismic design methodology, 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, 2, 821-830.
9. Kunnath, S. K., El-Bahy, A., Taylor, A. W., and Stone, W. C., 1997, Cumulative seismic damage of reinforced concrete bridge piers, NISTIR, 6075, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, October.
10. NCHRP 12-49, 1999, Comprehensive specification for the seismic design of bridges, Draft, NCHRP 12-49, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, October.
11. Priestley, M.J.N., Seible, F., and Calvi, G. M., 1996, Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges, First, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 686 pp.
12. SEAOC, 1996, Appendix B: conceptual framework for performance-based seismic design, Vision 2000, Structural Engineers Association of California, 393-416.
13. Silva, P. F., Seible, F., and Priestley, M.J.N., 1997, Response of standard Caltrans pile-to-pile cap connections under simulated seismic loads, Structural Systems Research Project, 97/09, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, November.
14. Silva, P. F., Sritharan, S., Seible, F., and Priestley, M.J.N., 1998, Full-scale test of the Alaska cast-in-place steel shell three column bridge bent, Structural Systems Research Project, 98/13, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, November.
15. University of California, San Diego, 1999, The UCSD/PEER Performance Library for Concrete Bridge Components, Sub-Assemblages, and Systems under Simulated Seismic Loads, http://www.structures.ucsd.edu/PEER/Capacity_Catalog/capacity_catalog.html.
16. University of Washington, 1999, The UW-PEER Reinforced Concrete Column Test Database, http://maximus.ce.Washington.edu/~peera1.