Evaluation of social services in a HOPE VI housing development: Resident and staff perceptions of successes and barriers

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 47-59

  Collins, Mary Elizabeth ^a   Curley, Alexandra M ^a   Clay, Cassandra ^a   Lara, Rita ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Client satisfaction; Housing policy; Social services evaluation

Indexed keywords

HOUSING PROJECT; HOUSING PROVISION; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SERVICE PROVISION;

BOSTON; MASSACHUSETTS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 11844301255     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. L. Buron S. Popkin D. Levy L.E. Harris J. Khadduri The HOPE VI resident tracking study: A snapshot of the current living situation of original residents from eight sites 2002 Urban Institute
2. N.K. Denzin Sociological methods: A sourcebook 1978 McGraw-Hill New York
3. S. Feldstein R.L. Durham D. Stradtman T. Nallick Denver urban revitalization program final resident survey: HOPE VI program awareness and use and Quigg Newton quality of life 1999 Center for Community Development and Design, University of Colorado
4. A.E. Finkel K.A. Lennon E.R. Eisenstadt HOPE VI: A promising vintage? Policy Studies Review 17 2000 104-119
5. J.M. Holland L.J. Ganz P.T. Higgins K.I. Antonelli Service coordinators in senior housing: An exploration of an emerging role in long-term care Journal of Case Management 4 3 1995 108-111
6. B. Kamin Public housing in 1999: A hard assessment Architectural Record 187 11 1999 76-90
7. E. Kates A.M. Curley The effects of welfare reform in massachusetts: immigrant mothers and access to education and training Welfare education training access coalition, center for youth and communities, Heller graduate school, Brandeis 2002
8. L. Keating Redeveloping public housing: Relearning urban renewal's immutable lessons Journal of the American Planning Association 66 4 2000 1-13 (Retrieved from the World Wide Web at vweb.hwwilson.com).
9. G.T. Kingsley Federal Housing Assistance and Welfare Reform Urban Institute 4-19 1997 1-10 Retrieved from the World Wide Web at http://www.urban.org
10. S.L. McMurtry W.W. Hudson The client satisfaction inventory: Results of an initial validation study Research on Social Work Practice 10 5 2000 644-663
11. National Housing Law Project False HOPE: A critical assessment of HOPE VI public housing redevelopment program 2002 National Housing Law Project
12. Pitcoff, W. 1999. New Hope for Public Housing? National Housing Institute. (pp. 1-8) Retrieved from the World Wide Web at www.nhi.org .
13. S. Popkin D.K. Levy L.E. Harris J. Comey M.K. Cunningham L. Buron HOPE VI panel study: Baseline report 2002 Urban Institute
14. J.J. Salama The redevelopment of distressed public housing: Early results from HOPE VI sites in Atlanta, Chicago, and San Antonio Housing policy debate 1 1999 95-142
15. A. Schwartz K. Tajbakhsh Mixed-income housing: Unanswered questions. citiyscape A Journal of Policy Development and Research 3 2 1997 71-92
16. M.L. Small K. Newman Urban poverty after the truly disadvantaged: The rediscovery of the family, the neighborhood, and culture Annual Review of Sociology 27 2001 23-45
17. R.E. Smith Housing choice for HOPE VI relocatees 2002 Urban Institute
18. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. (1999). HOPE VI: Building communities and transforming lives. Washington, DC.
19. U.S. Department, of Housing and Urban Development. (2001). HUD awards $35 million grant to Boston to transform public housing, help residents. No.01-084. September. 27 2001.
20. U.S. General, Accounting Office (GAO). (1998). HOPE VI: Progress and problems in revitalizing distressed public housing. GOA/RCED-98-187. Washington, DC July. 20 1998.
21. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). (2003a). Public housing: HOPE VI resident issues and changes in neighborhoods surrounding grant sites. GOA-04-109. Washington DC. November. 23, 2003.
22. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). (2003b). Public housing: HUD's oversight of HOPE VI sites needs to be more consistent. GOA-03-555. Washington, DC. May. 30 2003.
23. G. Van Ryzin M. Ronda D. Muzzio Factors related to self-sufficiency in a distressed public housing community Journal of Urban Affairs 23 1 2001 57-69