Correlation of histologic prognostic factors in core biopsies and therapeutic excisions of invasive breast carcinoma

American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 11-15

  Harris, Gavin C ^a   Denley, Helen E ^a   Pinder, Sarah E ^a   Lee, Andrew H S ^a   Ellis, Ian O ^a   Elston, Christopher W ^a   Evans, Andrew ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast; Carcinoma; Core biopsy; Grade

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; CARCINOMA IN SITU; FEMALE; HUMANS; MITOSIS; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0037215334     PISSN: 01475185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200301000-00002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Acheson M, Patton RG, Howisey RL, et al. Histological correlation of image-guided core biopsy with excisional biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Arch Surg 1997;132:815-21.
2. Astall EC, Bobrow LG. Assessment of accuracy of diagnostic and prognostic information provided by core biopsy in breast carcinoma [Abstract]. J Pathol 1998;186:6A.
3. Azam M, Raju U. Correlation of histologic grading of invasive ductal carcinoma in needle core biopsies and follow-up surgical excisions [Abstract]. Am J Clin Pathol 1998;110:517-8.
4. Berezowski K, Grimes MM, Wakely PP Jr. Correlation of histologic grading of infiltrating duct breast cancer in stereotaxic core biopsies with subsequent surgical specimens [Abstract]. Mod Pathol 1997;10:16.
5. Britton PD. Fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. Breast 1999;8:1-4.
6. Britton PD, Mcann J. Needle biopsy in the NHS breast screening program 1996/97: How much and how accurate? Breast 1999;8:5-11.
7. Britton PD, Flower CDR, Freeman AH, et al. Changing to core biopsy in an NHS breast screening unit. Clin Radiol 1997;52:764-7.
8. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: Improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997;202:843-7.
9. Dahlstrom JE, Sutton S, Jain S. Histological precision of stereotactic core biopsy in diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions. Histopathology 1996;28:537-41.
10. Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma: Reproducibility. Cancer 1994;73:2765-70.
11. Denley HE, Ellis IO, Elston CW, et al. An audit of grading and typing of invasive breast carcinoma on needle core biopsy specimens [Abstract]. J Pathol 1998;186:10A.
12. Denley HE, Pinder SE, Elston CW, et al. Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:20-4.
13. Di Loreto C, Puglisi F, Rimondi G, et al. Large core biopsy for diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of invasive breast carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1996;32:1693-700.
14. Ellis IO, Galea M, Broughton N, et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer: II. Histological type: Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1992;20:479-89.
15. Elston CW, Ellis IO. The Breast. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1998.
16. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer: I. The value of histologic grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991; 19:403-10.
17. Elston CWE, Ellis IO, Pinder SE. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Haematol 1999;31:209-23.
18. Jacobs TW, Siziopikou KP, Prioleau JE, et al. Do prognostic marker studies on core needle biopsy specimens of breast carcinoma accurately reflect the marker status of the tumor? Mod Pathol 1998;11:259-64.
19. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed at stereotactic breast biopsy: Improved reliability with 14-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology 1997;204:485-8.
20. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Shephard MJ, et al. Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. Radiology 1994;193:91-5.
21. Litherland JC, Evans AJ, Wilson ARM, et al. The impact of core-biopsy on preoperative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers. Clin Radiol 1996;51:562-5.
22. National Coordinating Group for Breast Screening Pathology. Guidelines for Nonoperative Diagnostic Procedures and Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening (publication no. 50). Sheffield: NHSBSP, 2001.
23. NHS Breast Screening Programme. Pathology Reporting in Breast Cancer Screening, 2nd Ed (publication no. 3). Sheffield: NHSBSP, 1997.
24. Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Galea M, et al. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer: III. Vascular invasion: Relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1994;24:41-7.
25. Pinder SE, Elston CW, Ellis IO. The role of preoperative diagnosis in cancer. Histopathology 1996;28:563-6.
26. Richardson A, Chandra, Lester S. Stereotactic large core needle biopsy of breast carcinomas: Correlation of histologic features in 77 matched surgical excisions [Abstract]. Mod Pathol 1996;9:23.
27. Robbins P, Pinder S, de Klerk N, et al. Histological grading of breast carcinomas: A study of interobserver agreement. Hum Pathol 1995;26:873-9.
28. Schwartz GF, Birchansky CA, Komarnicky LT, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by breast conservation for locally advanced carcinoma of the breast. Cancer 1994;73:362-9.
29. Shannon J, Douglas-Jones AG, Dallimore NS. Conversion to core biopsy in preoperative diagnosis of breast lesions: Is it justified by results. J Clin Pathol 2001;54:762-5.
30. Sharifi S, Terson MK, Baum J, et al. Assessment of pathologic prognostic factors in breast core needle biopsies. Mod Pathol 1999;12:941-5.
31. Thunnissen FBJM, Ambergen AW, Koss M, et al. Mitotic counting in surgical pathology: Sampling bias, heterogeneity and statistical uncertainty. Histopathology 2001;39:1-8.