Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 719-728

  Att, Wael ^a   Tsukimura, Naoki ^a   Suzuki, Takeo ^a   Ogawa, Takahiro ^a  

^a UCLA SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone titanium integration; Dental implants; Osteoconduction; Push in test; Surface topography

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; SULFURIC ACID; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE REGENERATION; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; FEMUR; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOBLAST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; COLLAGEN TYPE I; DENTAL MATERIALS; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; FEMUR; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; INTERFEROMETRY; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SULFURIC ACIDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 35649004400     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Albrektsson T, Brånemark P-I, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170.
2. Albrektsson T, Jacobsson M. Bone-metal interface in osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:597-607.
3. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR.The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
4. Cooper LF. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:522-534.
5. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A.Oral implant surfaces: Part 2-Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-564.
6. Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies:Their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:675-690.
7. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:391-401.
8. Ogawa T, Ozawa S, Shih JH, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of osseous implants having different surface topographies in rats. J Dent Res 2000;79:1857-1863.
9. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004;25:4087-4103.
10. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;85:496-500.
11. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:442-447.
12. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surfaced biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83.
13. Caulier H, Vercaigne S, Naert I, et al.The effect of Ca-P plasma-sprayed coatings on the initial bone healing of oral implants: An experimental study in the goat. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 34:121-128.
14. Vercaigne S,Wolke JG,Naert I,Jansen JA.Histomorphometrical and mechanical evaluation of titanium plasma-spraycoated implants placed in the cortical bone of goats. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;41:41-48.
15. Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1567-1575.
16. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1 Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:536-543.
17. Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:325-332.
18. Cooper LF, Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA.Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part II. In vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13: 163-174.
19. Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB, Carr AB, Naert I, Wennerberg A. Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 2003;53:409-443.
20. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:331-344.
21. Koizumi T, Nakayama T. Structure of oxide films formed on Ti in boiling dilute H2SO4 and NaCI.Corrosion Sci 1968:195,196.
22. Lim YJ,Oshida Y, Andres CJ, Barco MT.Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 ;16:333-342.
23. Ogawa T, Sukotjo C, Nishimura I. Modulated bone matrixrelated gene expression is associated with differences in interfacial strength of different implant surface roughness. J Prosthodont 2002;11:241-247.
24. London RM, Roberts FA, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O'Neal RB. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: Bone contact in vivo in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:369-376.
25. Ogawa T, Nishimura I. Different bone integration profiles of turned and acid-etched implants associated with modulated expression of extracellular matrix genes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:200-210.
26. Takeuchi K, Saruwatari L, Nakamura HK,Yang JM,Ogawa T. Enhanced intrinsic biomechanical properties of osteoblastic mineralized tissue on roughened titanium surface.J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;72:296-305.
27. Butz F, Aita H, Wang CJ, Ogawa T. Harder and stiffer bone osseointegrated to roughened titanium. J Dent Res 2006;85: 560-565.
28. Siddhanti SR, Quarles LD. Molecular to pharmacologic control of osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. J Cell Biochem 1994;55:310-320.
29. Alborzi A, Mac K,Glackin CA, Murray SS, Zernik JH. Endochondral and intramembranous fetal bone development: Osteoblastic cell proliferation, and expression of alkaline phosphatase, m-twist,and histone H4. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 1996;16:94-106.
30. Owen TA, Aronow M, Shalhoub V, et al. Progressive development of the rat osteoblast phenotype in vitro: Reciprocal relationships in expression of genes associated with osteoblast proliferation and differentiation during formation of the bone extracellular matrix. J Cell Physiol 1990;143:420-430.
31. Ozawa S, Ogawa T, lida K, et al. Ovariectomy hinders the early stage of bone-implant integration: Histomorphometric, biomechanical, and molecular analyses. Bone 2002;30:137-143.
32. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:486-494.
33. Masuda T. Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, Cooper LF. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration. Part I. In vivo studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13: 17-29.
34. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619.