Electronic data interchange: A multi-industry investigation using grounded theory

Information and Management

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 75-89

  Crook, Connie W ^a   Kumar, Ram L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic data interchange; Grounded theory; Interorganizational systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003953994     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00040-8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. S. Banerjee, D.Y. Golhar, Electronic data interchange: characteristics of users and nonusers, Inform. Manage. 26(2), 1993, pp. 65-74.
2. J.I. Cash, Jr., B.R. Konsynski, IS redraws competitive boundaries, Harvard Business Review 63(2), 1985, pp. 134-142.
3. J.W. Creswell, M.L. Brown, How chairpersons enhance faculty research: a grounded theory study, The Review of Higher Education 16(1), 1992, pp. 41-62.
4. R.B. Cooper, R.W. Zmud, Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach, Manage. Sci. 35(2), 1990, pp. 123-139.
5. J. Corbin, A. Strauss, Grounded theory research: procedures, cannons, and evaluative criteria, Quai. Soc. 13(1), 1990, pp. 3-21.
6. K.M. Eisenhardt, Building theories from case study research, Acad. Manage. Rev. 14(4), 1989, pp. 532-550.
7. P. Hart, C. Saunders, Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of EDI, Organization Science 8(1), 1997, pp. 23-42.
8. K.T. Hwang, C.C. Pegels, R. Rao, Vijay Sethi, Vikram Sethi, Factors related to the adoption of electronic data interchange, Proceedings of the 1993 Decision Sciences Institute, Washington, D. C., pp. 815-817.
9. C.L. Iacovou, I. Benbasat, A.S. Dexter, Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology, MIS Quarterly, 1995, 465-485.
10. R. Kumar, C.W. Crook, Educating senior management on the strategic benefits of EDI, J. Syst. Manage. 1996, 42-47.
11. M.L. Markus, M. Keil, If we build it, they will come: designing information systems that people want to use, Sloan Management Review 1994, 11-25.
12. B. Massetti, R.W. Zmud, Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: strategies and illustrative examples, MIS Quarterly 20(3), 1996, pp. 331-345.
13. W.J. Orlikowski, CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development, MIS Quarterly 17(3), 1993, pp. 309-340.
14. G. Premkumar, K. Ramamurthy, S. Nilakanta, Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective, J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 11(2), 1994, pp. 157-186.
15. C.S. Saunders, S. Clark, EDI adoption and implementation: A focus on interorganizational linkages, Inform. Resour. Manage. J. 5(1), 1992, pp. 9-19.
16. M.P. Sharfman, B. Gray, A. Yan, The context of interorganizational collaboration in the garment industry: an institutional perspective, J. Appl. Behavioral Sci. 27(2), 1991, pp. 181-208.
17. P.K. Sokol, EDI: The Competitive Edge, 1989, McGraw-Hill, New York.
18. A. Strauss, J. Corbin, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory, Procedures, and Techniques, 1990, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
19. P.M.C. Swatman, P.A. Swatman, Integrating EDI into the organization's systems: a model of the stages of integration, International Conference on Information Systems, 1991, 141-152.
20. C.S. Thachenkary, COINLink: the impacts of an EDI network on the automobile dealership and lending industries, IEEE Trans. Engng. Manage. 39(4), 1992, pp. 386-393.
21. N. Venkatraman, A. Zaheer, Electronic integration and strategic advantage: a quasi-experimental study in the insurance industry, Information Systems Research 1(4), 1990, pp. 377-393.
22. R.K. Yin, Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 1994, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.