MR angiography at 3 T for assessment of the external carotid artery system

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 189, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1088-1094

  Lohan, Derek G ^b   Barkhordarian, Fatemeh ^b   Saleh, Roya ^b   Krishnam, Mayil ^b   Salamon, Noriko ^b   Ruehm, Stefan G ^b   Finn, J Paul ^a  

^a Siemens Medical Solutions and GE Healthcare   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

External carotid artery; Head and neck imaging; MR angiography; Vascular system

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY OCCLUSION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EXTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CAROTID ARTERIES; CAROTID STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 35648994853     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2235     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Chiras J, Dormont D, Marsault C. Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 2003; 229:697-702
2. Berg M, Zhang Z, Ikonen A, et al. Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26:1022-1034
3. Broome DR, Girguis MS, Baron PW, Cottrell AC, Kjellin I, Kirk GA. Gadodiamide-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: why radiologists should be concerned. AJR 2007; 188:586-592
4. Chewning RH, Murphy KJ. Gadolinium-based contrast media and the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with renal insufficiency. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18:331-333
5. Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA, Li W, Wolff S, Manning WJ, Edelman RR. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography with simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics: a pilot study. Radiology 2000; 217:284-289
6. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:952-962
7. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002; 47:1202-1210
8. Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Hoogeveen RM. Utilizing SENSE to achieve lower station sub-millimeter isotropic resolution and minimal venous enhancement in peripheral MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15:484-491
9. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, et al. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology 2005; 235:687-698
10. Rinck PA, Muller RN. Field strength and dose dependence of contrast enhancement by gadolinium-based MR contrast agents. Eur Radiol 1999; 9:998-1004
11. Elden L, Montanera W, Terbrugge K, Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Charles D. Angiographic embolization for the treatment of epistaxis: a review of 108 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994; 111:44-50
12. Scaramuzzi N, Walsh RM, Brennan P, Walsh M. Treatment of intractable epistaxis using arterial embolization. Clin Otolaryngol 2001; 26:307-309
13. Vokes DE, McIvor NP, Wattle WJ, Chaplin JM, Morton RP. Endovascular treatment of epistaxis. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74:751-753
14. Marshall AH, Bradley PJ. Management dilemmas in the treatment and follow-up of advanced juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2006; 68:273-278
15. Smith TP. Embolization in the external carotid artery. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17:1897-1913
16. Kasper GC, Welling RE, Wladis AR, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to carotid paragangliomas. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2006-2007; 40:467-474
17. Sclafani AP, Sclafani SJ. Angiography and transcatheter arterial embolization of vascular injuries of the face and neck. Laryngoscope 1996; 106 (2 Pt 1): 168-173
18. Lal BK, Hobson RW, Goldstein J, et al. In-stent recurrent stenosis after carotid artery stenting: life table analysis and clinical relevance. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38:1162-1168; discussion 1169
19. Willfort-Ehringer A, Ahmadi R, Gruber D, et al. Effect of carotid artery stenting on the external carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38:1039-1044
20. Tsurumaru D, Kuraiwa T, Yabuuchi H, Hirata H, Higaki Y, Tomita K. Efficacy of intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy for head and neck cancers using coaxial catheter technique: initial experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2007; 30:207-211
21. Wu CF, Chen CM, Chen CH, Shieh TY, Sheen MC. Continuous intraarterial infusion chemotherapy for early lip cancer. Oral Oncol 2007; 43:825-830
22. Sumant S, Kumar P, Wan J, et al. Concomitant radiation therapy and targeted cisplatin chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced pyriform sinus carcinoma: disease control and preservation of organ function. Head Neck 1999; 21:595-601
23. Terashima K, Shioyama Y, Nakamura K, et al. Long-term local control of recurrent adenoid cystic carcinoma in the parotid gland with radiotherapy and intraarterial infusion chemotherapy. Radiat Med 2006; 24:287-291
24. Lee BB, Do YS, Yakes W, Kim DI, Mattassi R, Hyon WS. Management of arteriovenous malformations: a multidisciplinary approach. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39:590-600
25. Arning C, Grzyska U, Lachenmayer L. Duplex ultrasound of external carotid artery branches for the detection of dural arteriovenous fistulae [in German]. Rofo 2005; 177:236-241
26. Ziyeh S, Strecker R, Berlis A, Weber J, Klisch J, Mader I. Dynamic 3D MR angiography of intra-and extracranial vascular malformations at 3T: a technical note. Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26:630-634
27. Nael K, Villablanca JP, Saleh R, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with time-of-flight MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27:2118-2121
28. Spiera RF, Spiera H. Therapy for giant cell arteritis: can we do better? Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54:3071-3074
29. Bley TA, Ness T, Warnatz K, et al. Influence of corticosteroid treatment on MRI findings in giant cell arteritis. Clin Rheumatol 2007; 26:1541-1543
30. Markl M, Uhl M, Wieben O, et al. High resolution 3T MRI for the assessment of cervical and superficial cranial arteries in giant cell arteritis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24:423-427
31. Lei T, Xu DC, Gao JH, et al. Using the frontal branch of the superficial temporal artery as a landmark for locating the course of the temporal branch of the facial nerve during rhytidectomy: an anatomical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116:623-629; discussion 630
32. Pinar YA, Govsa F. Anatomy of the superficial temporal artery and its branches: its importance for surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28:248-253
33. Elazab EEB, Abdel-Hameed FAM. The arterial supply of the temporalis muscle. Surg Radiol Anat 2006; 28:241-247
34. Shima H, von Luedinghausen M, Ohno K, Michi K. Anatomy of microvascular anastomosis in the neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101:33-41