Towards a model of effective school feedback: School heads' points of view

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 311-325

  Van Petegem, Peter ^a   Vanhoof, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35648933500     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: 17444187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803610701702522     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bosker, R., Lam, J. F., Luyten, H., Steen, R., & De Vos, H. (1998). Het vergelijken van schalen [Comparing schools]. Enschede, The Netherlands: Universiteit Twente.
2. De Meyer, I., De Vos, H., & Van de Poele, L. (2002). Worldwide learning at age IS-First results from PISA 2000. Brussels, Belgium: MVG.
3. Emin, J. (1995). Des indicateurs de performance des lycées [Performance indicators on high schools]. Paris: Direction de l'évaluation et de la prospective (DEP).
4. Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1997). The value added national project: Final report London: SCAA.
5. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
6. Goldstein, H. (1993). Assessing group differences. Oxford Review of Education, 19, 141-150.
7. Gray, J. (1993). Value added approaches in school evaluation: The experiences of three LEAs in England. Lessons and challenges. Edinburgh, UK: The Audit unit, HM Inspectors of Schools, Scottish Office.
8. McBeath, J., Jakobsen, L., Meuret, D., & Scratz, M. (2000). Self-evaluation in European schools: A story of change. London: Routledge.
9. Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement. Building capacity for a learning community. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
10. Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap (MVG). (2002). Vlaanderen in TIMSS [Flanders in TIMSS]. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
11. Nevo, D. (2002). Dialogue evaluation: Combining internal and external evaluation. In D. Nevo (Ed.), School-based evaluation: An international perspective (pp. 3-16). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
12. Scheerens, J., & Hendriks, M. (Eds.). (2002). Benchmarking the quality of education. Enschede, The Netherlands: Universiteit Twente.
13. Scottish Office Education and Industry Department. (1997). How good is our school? Taking a closer look at specialist services. Edinburgh, UK: Author.
14. Thomas, S. (1998). Value-added measures of school effectiveness in the United Kingdom. Prospects, 28(1), 91-108.
15. Van Damme, J., & Van den Broeck, A. (2000). Enige uitleg bij de schoolrapporten [Some clarifications concerning the school reports]. Unpublished document, Centre for Educational Effectiveness and Evaluation, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium.
16. Van Petegem, P., Vanhoof, J., Daems, F., & Mahieu, P. (2005). Publishing information on individual schools? Educational Research and Evaluation, 11, 45-60.
17. Visscher, A., & Coe, R. (2003). School performance feedback systems: Conceptualisation, analysis, and reflection. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 321-349.
18. Visscher, A. J. (2002). A framework for studying school performance feedback systems. In A. J. Visscher & R. Coe (Eds.), School improvement through performance feedback (pp. 41-71). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
19. Yang, M., Goldstein, H., Rath, T., & Hill, N. (1999). The use of assessment data for improvement purposes. Oxford Review of Education, 25(4), 469-483.