Publishing information on individual schools?

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-60

  Van Petegem, P ^a   Vanhoof, J ^a   Daems, F ^a   Mahieu, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21944431675     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803610500110372     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Agerbeek, M. (1998). Keuzegids 1999 middelbare scholen [Guide to choosing secondary schools 1999]. Zeist, The Netherlands: Kerckebosch.
2. Atha, A. (1998). The good schools guide. London: Lucas.
3. Bosker, R., Lam, J.F., Luyten, H., Steen, R., & de Vos, H. (1998). Het vergelijken van scholen. [Comparing schools]. Enschede, The Netherlands: Universiteit Twente.
4. Croxford, L. (1999). League tables - Who needs them? NCE briefing, No 14, National Commission on Education.
5. Croxford, L., & Cowie, M. (1996). The effectiveness of Grampian secondary schools, a report to Grampian Regional Council. Edinburgh, UK: Centre for Educational Sociology, University of Edinburgh.
6. Daems, F., Mahieu, P., Van Petegem, P. & Vanhoof, J. (2000). Naar publiek rapporteren over scholen? [Towards publishing information on individual schools?] Niet-gepubliceerd rapport naar aanleiding van OBPWO-onderzoek 98.03 "Scholen vergeleken op hun kwaliteit. Een internationaal vergelijkende studie over hoe scholen hun functioneren openbaar (kunnen/moeten) verantwoorden". [Unpublished research report].
7. Department for Education and Employment [DfEE]. (1999). Code of practice. School admissions. Nottingham, UK: Author.
8. Dronkers, J. (1998). Het betere is de vijand van het goede. Een reactie op de commentaren over het Trouw rapportcijfer [The better is the enemy of the good]. Pedagogische Studiën, 75, 142-150.
9. Emin, J. (1995). Des indicateurs de performance des lycées [Performance indicators on high schools]. Paris: Direction de l'évaluation et de la prospective (DEP).
10. Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1992). Performance indicators and examination results. Interchange Series, nr. 11. Edinburgh, UK: SOEID.
11. Fitz-Gibbon, C. (1997). The Value Added National Project: Final report. London: SCAA.
12. Goldstein, H., & Myers, K. (1996). Freedom of information: Towards a code of ethics for performance indicators. Research intelligence, 57, 12-16.
13. Gray, J. (1993). Value added approaches in school evaluation: the experiences of three LEAs in England. Lessons and Challenges. Edinburgh, UK: The Audit unit, HM Inspectors of Schools, Scottish Office.
14. Jesson, D. (1995). Value added aspects of managing school effectiveness. In J. Bell & B.T. Harrison (Eds.), Vision and values in managing education: Successful leadership principles and practice. London: Fulton.
15. Joffrin, L. (1999). Oui, il faut publier le classement des lycées [Yes, one has to publish classifications of high schools]. Libération, 4 Avril 1999.
16. Karsten, S., Visscher A., & de Jong T. (1999). Handle with care! Buitenlandse ervaringen met het publiceren van schoolprestatiegegevens. Den Haag: Onderwijsraad.
17. Levacic, R., Hardman, J., & Woods, P. (1998). Relating competition to school performance, evidence from a study of English secondary schools. Paper presented at the annual conference for educational research, Slovenia.
18. Mars, J. (1999). "Materialistisch" rekenwerk behoeft pedagogische dimensie [Mathematical computations need a pedagogical dimension]. Vernieuwing, 7/8, 15-18.
19. Ministère de l'education nationale, de la recherche et de la technologie [MEN]. (1998). Note d'information. 98.07. Paris: Author.
20. Ministère de l'education nationale, de la recherche et de la technologie [MEN]. (1999). L'edition 1999 des indicateurs de performance des lycées [The 1999 edition of performance indicators of high schools]. Communiqué de presse du 31 1999. Paris: Author.
21. Onderwijsraad. (1998). Kwaliteitskaart voortgezet onderwijs [Quality charts on secondary schools]. Den Haag: Author.
22. Onderwijsraad. (1999). Schoolkwaliteit in beeld: voorstellen voor een verantwoorde openbaarmaking van gegevens over de kwaliteit van scholen [Picturing school quality: suggestions for publishing information on schools' quality]. Den Haag: Author.
23. Paterson, L. (1993). A commentary on methods currently being used in Scotland to evaluate schools statistically. In L. Paterson (Ed.), Measuring schools: The rights and the wrongs of practice in Scotland. Edinburgh, UK: CES.
24. Schagen, I. (1998). Adding value with value-added. Paper prepared for the NFER's Annual Conference, (http://www.nfer.ac.uk/conferences/value.htm) (accessed at 3.9.01).
25. Smith, P. (1995). Unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International journal of public administration, 18(2&3), 277-310.
26. Sparkes, R.A. (1999, September). Lies, damned lies and school performance indicators. Paper presented at the Scottisch Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Dundee.
27. Thomas, S. (1998). Value-added measures of school effectiveness in the United Kingdom. Prospects, 28 (1), 91-108.
28. Thomas, S., Sammons, P., & Street, H. (1997). Value added approaches: Fairer ways of comparing schools. SIN Research Matters, nr. 7. London: Institute of education, University of London.
29. Thomas, S., Smees, R., MacBeath, J., Sammons, P., Robertson, P., & Mortimore, P. (1998). Creating a value added framework for Scottish Schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
30. West, A., & Pennell, H. (2000). Publishing school examination results in England: Incentives and consequences. Educational Studies, 26(4), 423-436.
31. Woods, Ph.A., Bagley. C., & Glatter, R. (1998). School responsiveness in a competitive climate: The public market in England. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 650-676.
32. Yang, M., Goldstein, H., Rath, T., & Hill, N. (1999). The use of assessment data for improvement purposes. Oxford Review of education, 25(4), 469-483.