Partial harvesting in the Canadian boreal: Success will depend on stand dynamic responses

Forestry Chronicle

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 319-325

  Thorpe, H C ^a   Thomas, S C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Boreal forest; Ecosystem management; Growth response; Natural disturbance emulation; Partial cut; Post harvest mortality; Structural retention; Windthrow

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CULTIVATION; ECOSYSTEMS; GROWTH KINETICS; HARVESTING;

ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; NATURAL DISTURBANCE EMULATION; PARTIAL CUT; STRUCTURAL RETENTION;

FORESTRY;

BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; DISTURBANCE; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; GROWTH RESPONSE; MORTALITY; SILVICULTURE; STAND DYNAMICS; TIMBER HARVESTING; WINDTHROW;

ECOSYSTEMS; FORESTRY; HARVESTING; SILVICULTURE;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 35548989634     PISSN: 00157546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5558/tfc83319-3     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Amiro, B.D., J.B. Todd, B.M. Wotton, K.A. Logan, M.D. Flannigan, B.J. Stocks, J.A. Mason, D.L. Martell and K.G. Hirsch. 2001. Direct carbon emissions from Canadian fires, 1959-1999. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 512-525.
2. Assmann, E.A. 1970. The principles of forest yield study; studies in the organic production, structure, increment, and yield of forest stands. Trans. S.H. Gardiner. Oxford Pergamon Press. London. 506 p.
3. Attiwill, P.M. 1994. The disturbance of forest ecosystems: the ecological basis for conservation management. For. Ecol. Manag. 63: 247-300.
4. Bebber, D.P., S.C. Thomas, W.G. Cole and D. Balsillie. 2004. Diameter increment in mature eastern white pine Pinus strobus L. following partial harvest of old-growth stands in Ontario, Canada. Trees 18: 29-34.
5. Beese, W.J. and J.T. Arnott. 1999. Montane Alternative Silvicultural Systems (MASS): Establishing and managing a multi-disciplinary, multi-partner research site. For. Chron. 75: 413-416.
6. Beese, W.J. and A.A. Bryant. 1999. Effect of alternative silvicultural systems on vegetation and bird communities in coastal montane forests of British Columbia, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 115: 231-242.
7. Bergeron, Y. 2000. Species and stand dynamics in the mixed woods of Quebec's southern boreal forest. Ecology 81: 1500-1516.
8. Bergeron, Y., S. Gauthier, V. Kafka, P. Lefort and D. Lesieur. 2001. Natural fire frequency for the eastern Canadian boreal forest: consequences for sustainable forestry. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 384-391.
9. Bergeron, Y. and B. Harvey. 1997. Basing silviculture on natural ecosystem dynamics: an approach applied to the southern boreal mixedwood forest of Quebec. For. Ecol. Manag. 92: 235-242.
10. Bergeron, Y., B. Harvey, A. Leduc and S. Gauthier. 1999. Forest management guidelines based on natural disturbance dynamics: Standand forest-level considerations. For. Chron. 75: 49-54.
11. Bevilacqua, E., D. Puttock, T.J. Blake and D. Burgess. 2005. Long-term differential stem growth responses in mature eastern white pine following release from competition. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 511-520.
12. Bladon, K.D., U. Silins, S.M. Landhausser and V.J. Lieffers. 2006. Differential transpiration by three boreal tree species in response to increased evaporative demand after variable retention harvesting. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 138: 104-119.
13. Bock, M.D. and K.C.J. Van Rees. 2002. Forest harvesting impacts on soil properties and vegetation communities in the Northwest Territories. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 713-724.
14. Bourgeois, L., C. Messier and S. Brais. 2004. Mountain maple and balsam fir early response to partial and clear-cut harvesting under aspen stands of northern Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 2049-2059.
15. Bradbury, S. 2004. Understorey plant communities in boreal cutblocks with different sizes and numbers of residual tree patches. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1220-1227.
16. British Columbia Ministry of Forests (BCMOF). 1995 The Forest Practices Code of British Columbia Act, Biodiversity Guidebook. Queen's Printer. Victoria, British Columbia.
17. nd ed. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa [0nline]. Available at http://nfdp.ccfm.org/silvaterm/silvi_e/silvitermintroe.htm.
18. Canham, C.D., P.T. LePage and K.D. Coates. 2004. A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition: effects of shading versus crowding. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 778-787.
19. Caspersen, J.P. 2006. Elevated mortality of residual trees following single-tree felling in northern hardwood forests. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 1255-1265.
20. Coates, K.D. 1997. Windthrow damage 2 years after partial cutting at the Date Creek silvicultural systems study in the Interior Cedar-Hemlock forests of northwestern British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 1695-1701.
21. Dahlberg, A., J. Schimmel, A.F.S. Taylor and H. Johannesson. 2001. Post-fire legacy of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities in the Swedish boreal forest in relation to fire severity and logging intensity. Biol. Cons. 100: 151-161.
22. Deal, R.L., J.C. Tappeiner and P.E. Hennon. 2002. Developing silvicultural systems based on partial cutting in western hemlock-Sitka spruce stands of southeast Alaska. Forestry 75: 425-431.
23. Deans, A.M., J.R. Malcolm, S.M. Smith and M.I. Bellocq. 2005. Edge effects and the responses of aerial insect assemblages to structural-retention harvesting in Canadian boreal peatland forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 204: 249-266.
24. Deans, A.M., J.R. Malcolm, S.M. Smith and T.J. Carleton. 2003. A comparison of forest structure among old-growth, variable retention harvested, and clearcut peatland black spruce (Picea mariana) forests in boreal northeastern Ontario. For. Chron. 79: 579-289.
25. FERNS 2006. Forest Ecosystem Research Network of Sites (FERNS) website. Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada [online]. Available at www.pfc.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/ecology/ferns.
26. Fisher, J.T. and S.M. Bradbury. 2006. Understorey protection harvest expedites recolonisation of boreal forest stands by North American red squirrels. For. Ecol. Manag. 234: 40-47.
27. Franklin, J.F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems or landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 3: 202-205.
28. st Century: the science of ecosystem management. pp. 111-139. Island Press, Washington, DC.
29. Franklin, J.F., T.A. Spies, R. Van Pelt, A.B. Carey, D.A. Thornburgh, D.R. Berg, D.B. Lindenmayer, M.E. Harmon, W.S. Keeton, D.C. Shaw, K. Bible and J.Q. Chen. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglas-fir forests as an example. For. Ecol. Manag. 155: 399-423.
30. Galindo-Leal, C. and F.L. Bunnell. 1995. Ecosystem management: implications and opportunities of a new paradigm. For. Chron. 71: 601-606.
31. Gandhi, K.J.K., J.R. Spence, D.W. Langor, L.E. Morgantini and K.J. Cryer. 2004. Harvest retention patches are insufficient as stand analogues of fire residuals for litter-dwelling beetles in northern coniferous forests. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1319-1331.
32. Groot, A. 2002. Is uneven-aged silviculture applicable to peatland black spruce (Picea mariana) in Ontario, Canada? Forestry 75: 437-442.
33. Groot, A. and H. Hökkä. 2000. Persistence of suppression effects on peatland black spruce advance regeneration after overstory removal. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 753-760.
34. Groot, A., J.-M. Lussier, A.K. Mitchell and D.A. MacIsaac. 2005. A silvicultural systems perspective on changing Canadian forestry practices. For. Chron. 81: 50-55.
35. Harmon, M.E., J.F. Franklin, F.J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S.V. Gregory, J.D. Lattin, N.H. Anderson, S.P. Cline, N.G. Aumen, J.R. Sedell, G.W. Lienkaemper, K. Cromack Jr. and K.W. Cummins. 1986. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15: 133-302.
36. Harper, K., C. Boudreault, L. DeGrandpré, P. Drapeau, S. Gauthier and Y. Bergeron. 2003. Structure, composition and diversity of old-growth black spruce boreal forest of the Clay Belt region in Quebec and Ontario. Environ. Rev. 11: S79-S98.
37. Harvey, B.D., A. Leduc, S. Gauthier and Y. Bergeron. 2002. Stand-landscape integration in natural disturbance-based management of the southern boreal forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 155: 369-385.
38. Hautala, H., J. Jalonen, S. Laaka-Lindberg and I. Vanha-Majamaa. 2004. Impacts of retention felling on coarse woody debris (CWD) in mature boreal spruce forests in Finland. Biodivers. Conserv. 13: 1541-1554.
39. Huggard, D.J., W. Klenner and A. Vyse. 1999. Windthrow following four harvest treatments in an Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir forest in southern interior British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 29: 1547-1556.
40. Jalonen, J. and I. Vanha-Majamaa. 2001. Immediate effects of four different felling methods on mature boreal spruce forest understorey vegetation in southern Finland. For. Ecol. Manag. 146: 25-34.
41. Jones, T.A. and S.C. Thomas. 2004. The time course of diameter increment responses to selection harvests in Acer saccharum. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1525-1533.
42. Jones, T.A. and S.C. Thomas. 2007. Leaf-level acclimation to gap creation in mature Acer saccharum trees. Tree Physiol. 27: 281-290.
43. st Century: The Science of Ecosystem Management. pp. 1-9. Island Press, Washington, DC.
44. Lance, A.N. and M. Phinney. 2001. Bird responses to partial retention timber harvesting in central interior British Columbia. For. Ecol. Manag. 142: 267-280.
45. Latham, P. and J. Tappeiner. 2002. Response of old-growth conifers to reduction in stand density in western Oregon forests. Tree Physiol. 22: 137-146.
46. Lazaruk, L.W., G. Kernaghan, S.E. MacDonald and D. Khasa. 2005. Effects of partial cutting on the ectomycorrhizae of Picea glauca forests in northwestern Alberta. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 1442-1454.
47. Lesieur, D., S. Gauthier and Y. Bergeron. 2002. Fire frequency and vegetation dynamics for the south-central boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 1996-2009.
48. Lieffers, V.J., R.B. Macmillan, D. MacPherson, K. Branter and J.D. Stewart. 1996. Semi-natural and intensive silvicultural systems for the boreal mixedwood forest. For. Chron. 72: 286-292.
49. Lilja, S., M. De Chantal, T. Kuuluvainen, I. Vanha-Majamaa and P. Puttonen. 2005. Restoring natural characteristics in managed Norway spruce [Picea abies (L.) Karst.] stands with partial cutting, dead wood creation and fire: immediate treatment effects. Scan. J. For. Res. 20: 68-78, Supp. 6.
50. Liu, X.D., U. Silins, V.J. Lieffers and R.Z. Man. 2003. Stem hydraulic properties and growth in lodgepole pine stands following thinning and sway treatment. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 1295-1303.
51. MacDonald, G.B., M.L. Cherry and D.J. Thompson. 2004. Effect of harvest intensity on development of natural regeneration and shrubs in an Ontario boreal mixedwood stand. For. Ecol. Manag. 189: 207-222.
52. MacDonald, G.B. and D.J. Thompson. 2003. Responses of planted conifers and natural hardwood regeneration to harvesting, scalping, and weeding on a boreal mixedwood site. For. Ecol. Manag. 182: 213-230.
53. MacDonell, M.R. and A. Groot. 1997. Harvesting peatland black spruce: Impacts on advance growth and site disturbance. For. Chron. 73: 249-255.
54. Maguire, D.A., D.B. Mainwaring and C.B. Halpern. 2006. Stand dynamics after variable-retention harvesting in mature Douglas-fir forests of Western North America. Allg. Forst. Jagdztg. 177: 120-129.
55. Martikainen, P., J. Kouki and O. Heikkala. 2006. The effects of green tree retention and subsequent prescribed burning on ground beetles (Coleoptera:Carabidae) in boreal pine-dominated forests. Ecography 29: 659-670.
56. McDowell, N., J.R. Brooks, S.A. Fitzgerald and B.J. Bond. 2003. Carbon isotope discrimination and growth response of old Pinus ponderosa trees to stand density reductions. Plant. Cell. Environ. 26: 631-644.
57. McRae, D.J., L.C. Duchesne, B. Freedman, T.J. Lynham and S. Woodley. 2001. Comparisons between wildfire and forest harvesting and their implications in forest management. Environ. Rev. 9: 223-260.
58. Mitchell, S.J. and W.J. Beese. 2002. The retention system: reconciling variable retention with the principles of silvicultural systems. For. Chron. 78: 397-403.
59. Moore, J.R., D.A. Maguire, D.L. Phillips and C.B. Halpern. 2002. Effects of varying levels of green-tree retention on amount of harvesting damage.W. J. Appl. For. 17: 202-206.
60. Moses, R.A. and S. Boutin. 2001. The influence of clear-cut logging and residual leave material on small mammal populations in aspendominated boreal mixedwoods. Can. J. For. Res. 31: 483-495.
61. Navratil, S., L.G. Brace, E.A. Sauder and S. Lux. 1994. Silvicultural and harvesting options to favour immature white spruce and aspen regeneration in boreal mixedwoods. Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, AB. Information Report NOR-X-337.
62. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR). 2001. Forest Management Guide for Natural Disturbance Pattern Emulation. Queen's Printer. Peterborough, Ontario. Available at http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/mnr/forests/ forestdoc/ebr/guide/natural_dist/part%20one.pdf.
63. Prudham, W.S. 2005. Knock on Wood: Nature as Commodity in Douglas-fir Country. Routledge, New York. 259 p.
64. Ruel, J.-C. 1989. Mortalité du bois laissé sur pied à la suite d'une coupe par bandes dans trois régions du Québec. For. Chron. 65: 107-113.
65. Ruel, J.-C. 1995. Understanding windthrow: silvicultural implications. For. Chron. 71: 434-445.
66. Ruel, J.-C., D. Pin and K. Cooper. 2001. Windthrow in riparian buffer strips: effect of wind exposure, thinning and strip width. For. Ecol. Manag. 143: 105-113.
67. Ruel, J.-C, P. Raymond and M. Pineau. 2003. Windthrow after shelterwood cutting in balsam fir stands. N. J. Appl. For. 20: 5-13.
68. Scarratt, J.B. 2001. Black sturgeon boreal mixedwood research project: Establishment report. Canadian Forest Service, Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.
69. Scott R.E. and S.J. Mitchell. 2005. Empirical modelling of windthrow risk in partially harvested stands using tree, neighbourhood, and stand attributes. For. Ecol. Manag. 218: 193-209.
70. Sist, P. and N. Nguyen-The. 2002. Logging damage and the subsequent dynamics of a dipterocarp forest in East Kalimantan (1990-1996) For. Ecol. Manag. 165: 85-103.
71. th Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 560 p.
72. Tallman, J.L. 1998. Planning and operating manual: harvesting with regeneration protection. Lake Abitibi Model Forest and Abitibi Consolidated. 17 p.
73. Thorpe, H.C., S.C. Thomas and J.P. Caspersen. Residual-tree growth responses to partial stand harvest in the black spruce (Picea mariana) forest. (In review).
74. Urban, S.T., V.J. Lieffers and S.E. MacDonald. 1994. Release in radial growth in the trunk and structural roots of white spruce as measured by dendrochronology. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 1550-1556.
75. Vanderwel, M.C., J.R. Malcolm and S.C. Mills. A meta-analysis of forest bird responses to partial retention harvesting. In press.
76. Walter, S.T. and C.C. Maguire. 2004. Conifer response to three silvicultural treatments in the Oregon Coast Range foothills. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1967-1978.
77. Whitney, R.D., R.L. Fleming, K. Zhou and D.S. Mossa. 2002. Relationship of root rot to black spruce windfall and mortality following strip clear-cutting. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 283-294.
78. Wiser, S.K., R.B. Allen, U. Benecke, G. Baker and D. Peltzer. 2005. Tree growth and mortality after small-group harvesting in New Zealand old-growth Nothofagus forests. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 2323-2331.
79. Youngblood, A.P. 1991. Radial growth after a shelterwood seed cut in a mature stand of white spruce in interior Alaska. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 410-413.