Comparative study of the characteristics of the carcass and the meat of the Chato Murciano pig and its cross with Iberian pig, reared indoors

Animal Science Journal

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 659-667

  Galián, Miguel ^a   Peinado, Begoña ^a   Martínez, Carmen ^b   Periago, María J ^b   Ros, Gaspar ^b   Poto, Angel ^a  

^a Murcian Institute of Investigation and Agricultural Development IMIDA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Chato Murciano pig; Iberian pig; Meat quality; Minerals; Musculus longissimus lumbar

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; SUIDAE;

EID: 35548968015     PISSN: 13443941     EISSN: 17400929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2007.00487.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Asenjo B, Miguel JA, Ciria J, Calvo JL. 2005. Factores que influyen en la calidad de la canal. In : Cañeque V, Sañudo C (eds), Estandarización de las metodologías para evaluar la calidad del producto (animal vivo, canal, carne y grasa) en los rumiantes, pp. 24 35. Instituto de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria, Madrid.
2. Benito J, Vázquez C, Menaya C, Ferrera JL, García Casco JM, Silió L, Rodrigañez J, Rodríguez MC. 1998. Evolución de los parámetros productivos en distintas líneas de cerdo Ibérico. Eyora, Portugal.
3. CESNID. 2004. Tablas de composición de alimentos. McGraw-Hill-Interamericana, Santa Coloma de Gramanet, Spain.
4. Daszkiewicz T, Denaburski J, Sáiz Cidoncha F. 2004. Efecto de la grasa intramuscular sobre la calidad sensorial de la carne. Avances en Tecnología Porcina. 1, 4 12.
5. Estévez M, Morcuende D, Cava López R. 2003. Physico-chemical characteristics of M. Longissimus dorsi from three lines of free-range reared Iberian pigs slaughtered at 90 kgs live-weight and commercial pigs. A comparative study. Meat Science 64, 499 506.
6. Fernandez X, Monin G, Talmant A, Mourot J, Lebret B. 1999. Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat. 1. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of m. longissimus lumborum. Meat Science 53, 59 65.
7. Franci O, Campodoni G, Bozzi R, Pugliese C, Acciaioli A, Gandini G. 2003. Productivity of Cinta Senese and Large White x Cinta Senese pigs reared outdoors in woodlands and indoors. 2. Slaughter and carcass traits. Italian Journal of Animal Science 2, 59 65.
8. Gandemer G, Pichou D, Bougennec B, Caritez JC, Berge P, Briand E, Legault C. 1990. Influence du systéme d'élevage et du génotype sur la composition chimique et les qualités organoleptiques du muscle long dorsal chez le porc. Journées Recherche Porcine En France 22, 101 110.
9. Hoffmann K. 1990. Definition and measurement of meat quality. Proc. 36th Icomst, pp. 941 954. La Habana, Cuba.
10. Honikel KO. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science 49, 447 457.
11. Igrn I. 1989. Meat quality: defining the term by modern standards. Fleischwirtschaft 69, 1268 1270.
12. ISO 1443. 1979. Meat and Meat Content. Determination of Fat. Panreac Química SA, Barcelona, Spain.
13. Labroue F, Goumy S, Gruand J, Mourot J, Neelz V, Legault C. 2000. Comparaison au Large White de quatre races locales porcines françaises pour le performances de croissance, de carcasse et de qualité de la viande. Journèes de la Recherche Porcine En France 32, 403 411.
14. Lebret B, Massabie P, Granier R, Juin H, Mourot J, Chevillon P. 2002. Influence of outdoor rearing and indoor temperature on growth performance, carcass, adipose tissue and muscle traits in pigs, and on the technological and eating quality of dry-cured hams. Meat Science 62, 447 455.
15. Leonhard M, Wenk C. 1997. Variability of selected vitamins and trace elements of different meat cuts. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 10, 218 224.
16. Lombardi-Boccia G, Lauzi S, Aguzzi A. 2005. Aspects of meat quality: trace elements and B vitamins in raw and cooked meats. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 18, 39 46.
17. Mayoral AI. 1994. El crecimiento en la canal porcina Ibérica: Estudio anatomo-descriptivo y consideraciones aplicativas (Tesis Doctoral). Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Extremadura.
18. McCance X, Widdowsons's X. 1991. The Composition of Foods Royal Society of Chemistry, 5th edn. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge.
19. Muñoz M, Ledesma JA. 2002. Tablas de valor nutritivo de alimentos. McGraw Hill, Mexico.
20. Nuernberg K, Fischer K, Nuernberg G, Kuechenmeister U, Klosowska D, Eliminowska-Wenda G, Fiedler I, Ender K. 2005. Effects of dietary olive and linseed oil on lipid composition, meat quality, sensory characteristics and muscle structure in pigs. Meat Science 70, 63 74.
21. Peinado B, Poto A, Gil F, López G. 2004. Characteristics of the carcass and meat of the Chato Murciano pig. Livestock Production Science 90, 285 292.
22. Peinado B, Poto A, Marín M, Lobera JB. 2001. Raza porcina Chato Murciano. Conservación Genética de Razas Autóctonas (II). Porci. Tratado de Ganado Porcino 61, 39 55.
23. Poto A. 2003. Estudio de la calidad de la canal y de la carne del cerdo Chato Murciano (Tesis Doctoral). Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, España.
24. Poto A, López G, Medina P, González J, Lobera JB, Martínez M, Peinado B. 2000. La mejor forma de recuperar la raza porcina Chato Murciano es mejorando la calidad de la carne de otras razas. Archivos de Zootecnia 49, 195 200.
25. Poto A, Peinado B, Gil F. 2003. El Chato Murciano. Materia prima de calidad (I). Mundo Ganadero 159, 32 37.
26. Poto A, Peinado B, Gil F. 2004. El Chato Murciano, Materia Prima de Calidad (y II). Mundo Ganadero 162, 50 56.
27. Poto A, Peinado B, Marín M, Lobera JB. 2002. El cerdo Chato Murciano. Ediporc 52, 3 13.
28. Pugliese C, Calagna G, Chiofalo V, Moretti VM, Margiotta S, Franci O, Gandini G. 2004. Comparison of the performances of Nero Siciliano pigs reared indoors and outdoors: 2. Joints composition, meat and fat traits. Meat Science 68, 523 528.
29. Pugliese C, Madonia G, Chiofalo V, Margiotta S, Acciaioli A, Gandini G. 2003. Comparison of the perfomances of Nero Siciliano pigs reared indoors and outdoors. Growth and carcass composition. Meat Science 65, 825 831.
30. Rosenvold K, Andersen HJ. 2003. Factors of significance for pork quality - a review. Meat Science 64, 219 237.
31. Ruane J. 1999. Selecting breed for conservation. In : Oldenbroek JK (ed.), Genebanks and the conservation of farm animal genetic resources, pp. 59 74. ID-DLO, Lelystad, Holland.
32. Serra X, Gil F, Pérez-Enciso M, Oliver MA, Vázquez JM, Gispert M, Díaz I, Moreno F, Latorre R, Noguera JL. 1998. A comparison of carcass, meat quality and histochemical characteristics of Iberian (Guadyerbas line) and Landrace pigs. Livestock Production Science 56, 215 223.
33. Solis M, de Pedro E, Garrido A, García J, Silió L, Rodríguez C, Rodrigáñez J. 2001. Evaluación de la composición del lomo del cerdo Ibérico mediante la tecnología NIRS. Cited 7 Jan 2007. Available from URL: http://www.uco.es/organiza/departamentos/prod-animal/p-animales/cerdo-iberico/ Bibliografia/A35Aida01p3.PDF
34. Touraille C, Monin G, Legault C. 1989. Eating quality of meat from european x chinese crossbred pigs. Meat Science 25, 177 186.
35. Warner RD, Kauffman RG, Greaser ML. 1997. Muscle protein changes post mortem in relation to pork quality traits. Meat Science 45, 339 352.