Three new models for preference voting and aggregation

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1389-1393

  Wang, Y M ^a,b   Chin, K S ^c   Yang, J B ^b  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Borda Kendall method; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Preference aggregation; Preference voting

Indexed keywords

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING;

BORDA KENDALL METHODS; PREFERENCE AGGREGATION; PREFERENCE VOTING; RANKING;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 35448970700     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602295     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Cook WD and Kress M (1990). A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Mngt Sci 36: 1302-1310.
2. Foroughi AA, Jones DF and Tamiz M (2005). A selection method for a preferential election. Appl Math Comput 163: 107-116.
3. Foroughi AA and Tamiz M (2005). An effective total ranking model for a ranked voting system. Omega 33: 491-496.
4. Green RH, Doyle JR and Cook WD (1996). Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. Eur J Opl Res 90: 461-472.
5. Hashimoto A (1997). A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note. Eur J Opl Res 97: 600-604.
6. Noguchi H, Ogawa M and Ishii H (2002). The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes. J Comput Appl Math 146: 155-166.
7. Obata T and Ishii H (2003). A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data. Eur J Opl Res 151: 233-237.
8. Wang YM and Fu GW (1993). A new multiattribute decision-making method based on DEA thought. J Ind Eng Eng Mngt 7(1): 44-49 (in Chinese).
9. Wang YM, Yang JB and Xu DL (2005). A preference aggregation method through the estimation of utility intervals. Comput Opns Res 32: 2027-2049.