A selection method for a preferential election

Applied Mathematics and Computation

Volumn 163, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 107-116

  Foroughi, A A ^a   Jones, D F ^b   Tamiz, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QOM   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Efficiency; Voting

Indexed keywords

CONSTRAINT THEORY; DATA REDUCTION; EFFICIENCY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ASSURANCE REGION (AR); DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA); VOTING;

VOTING MACHINES;

EID: 12444259770     PISSN: 00963003     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2003.10.055     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Andersen P., Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 39(10):1993;1261-1264
2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E.L. Measuring the efficiencies of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2(6):1978;429-444
3. Cook W.D., Kress M. A data envelopment model for aggregating preference ranking. Management Science. 36(11):1990;1302-1310
4. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. Data Envelopment Analysis, A comprehensive text with models, Applications, references and DEA-solver software. 2000;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
5. Green R.H., Doyle J.R., Cook W.D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research. 90:1996;461-472
6. Hashimoto A. A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note. European Journal of Operational Research. 97:1997;600-604
7. Obata T., Ishii H. A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data. European Journal of Operational Research. 151:2003;233-237
8. Thompson R.G., Singleton F.D. jr., Thrall R.M., Smith B.A. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces. 16(6):1986;35-49