A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data

European Journal of Operational Research

Volumn 151, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 233-237

  Obata, Tsuneshi ^a   Ishii, Hiroaki ^b  

^a OITA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Ranked voting data; Ranking of candidates

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SET THEORY;

RANKED VOTING DATA;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0043092387     PISSN: 03772217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00597-0     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Aizerman M., Aleskerov F. Theory of Choice. 1995;North-Holland, Amsterdam.
2. Andersen P., Petersen N.C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science. 39(10):1993;1261-1264.
3. Arrow K.J. Social Choice and Individual Values. 2nd ed. 1963;Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
4. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research. 2:1978;429-444.
5. Cook W.D., Kress M. A data envelopment model for aggregating preference rankings. Management Science. 36(11):1990;1302-1310.
6. Green R.H., Doyle J.R., Cook W.D. Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research. 90:1996;461-472.
7. Hashimoto A. A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note. European Journal of Operational Research. 97:1997;600-604.
8. Thompson R.G., Singleton F.D. Jr., Thrall R.M., Smith B.A. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces. 16(6):1986;35-49.