Towards an ethics of "research programmes" in special education

International Journal of Disability, Development and Education

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 369-380

  Hausstätter, Rune Sarromaa ^a   Connolley, Steven ^a  

^a INLAND NORWAY UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Ethics; Philosophy of science; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448960694     PISSN: 1034912X     EISSN: 1465346X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10349120701654506     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Askheim, O. P. (2003). Fra normalisering til empowerment: Ideologier ogprahsis i arbeid med funksjonshemmede [From normalisation to empowerment: Ideologies and practise in work with disabled people]. Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal.
2. Barton, L. (1986). The politics of special educational needs. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1(3), 273-291.
3. Barton, L. (1993). The struggle for citizenship: The case of disabled people. Disability, Handicap & Society, 8(3), 235-249.
4. Booth, T., & Ainscow M. (2000). Index for Inclusion. Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol, UK: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.
5. Brantlinger, E. (1997). Using ideology: Case of nonrecognition of the politics of research and practice in special education. Review of Educational Research, 67(4), 425-459.
6. Brantlinger, E. (2001). Poverty, class and disability: A historical, social, and political perspective. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33(1), 1-24.
7. Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195-207.
8. Chalmers, A. F. (1999). What is this thing called science? Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
9. Emanuelsson, I. (2001). Reactive versus proactive support coordinator roles: An international comparison. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 16(2), 133-142.
10. Fuller, S. (2003). Kuhn vs. Popper. The struggle for the soul of science. Cambridge, UK: Icon Books.
11. Gray, D. E., & Denicolo, P. (1998). Research in special needs education: Objectivity or ideology? British Journal of Special Education, 23(3), 140-145.
12. Haug, P. (1999). Spesialundervisning i grunnskulen. Grunnlag, utvikling og innhald [Special teaching in primary school. Foundation, development and content]. Oslo, Norway: Abstrakt Forlag.
13. Hausstätter, R. S. (2004). An alternative framework for conceptualising and analysing special education research. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19(3), 367-374.
14. Kivirauma, J. (2004). Scientific revolutions in special education in Finland. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19(2), 123-144.
15. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Lakatos, I. (1995). Falsificationism and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), Imre Lakatos the methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 8-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1970).
17. Lakatos, I. (n.d.). Science and pseudoscience. Transcript from a lecture for The Open University (original broadcast on 30 June 1973). Retrieved May 10, 2006, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/ collections/lakatos/ scienceAndPseudoscienceTranscript.htm
18. Miller, D. (1985). Popper selections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Oliver, M. (1991). Disabled people and disabling environments. London: Jessica Kingsley.
20. Popper, K. (1999). Normal science and its dangers. In I. Lakatos & A Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 51-58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Skidmore, D. (1996). Towards an integrated theoretical framework for research into special education needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 11, 33-47.
22. Skrtic, T. (1991). Behind special education. A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
23. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. Retrieved August 22, 2007, from http://www.unesco.org/education/ pdCSALAMA_E.PDF
24. Van der Klift, E., & Kunc, N. (1994). Hell-bent on helping: Benevolence, friendship, and the politics of help. In J. Thousand, R. Villa, & A. Nevin (Eds.), Creativity and collaborative learning: A practical guide to empowering students and teachers. Retrieved August 22, 2007, from http://www.normemma.com/arhellbe.htm
25. Wolfensberger, W. (1989). Human service policies: The rhetoric versus the reality. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and dependency (pp. 23-42). London: The Falmer Press.
26. Wolfensberger, W. (1994). A personal interpretation of the mental retardation scene in light of the "signs of the times". Mental Retardation, 52(1), 19-33.
27. Wolfensberger, W. (1999). Concluding reflections and a look ahead into the future for normalization and social role valorization. In R. J. Flynn & R. A. Lemay (Eds.), A quarter-century of normalization and social role valorization: Evolution and impact (pp. 489-504). Ottawa, ONT.: University of Ottawa Press.