Ecological cost-benefit modelling of herbivore habitat quality degradation due to range fragmentation

Transactions in GIS

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 745-763

  Lundqvist, Henrik ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Functional distance; Habitat; Least cost modelling; Linear structures; Range use; Rangifer; Resource reachability

Indexed keywords

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEMS; POPULATION STATISTICS;

ECOLOGICAL COSTS; EDGE-EFFECTS; FUNCTIONAL DISTANCE; HABITAT; LEAST COST MODELING; LINEAR STRUCTURES; RANGE USE; RANGIFER; REACHABILITY; RESOURCE REACHABILITY;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; GIS; GPS; GRAZING; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT QUALITY; HERBIVORE; POPULATION DENSITY; RUMINANT; SOFTWARE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

ANIMALIA; RANGIFER; RANGIFER TARANDUS;

EID: 35448953639     PISSN: 13611682     EISSN: 14679671     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2007.01070.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aastrup P 2000 Responses of West Greenland caribou to the approach of humans on foot. Polar Research 19: 83-90
2. Adriaensen F, Chardon J P, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H, and Matthysen E 2003 The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64: 233-47
3. Alexander S M and Waters N M 2000 The effects of highway transportation corridors on wildlife: A case study of Banff National Park. Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies 8: 307-20
4. Altendorf K B, Laundre J W, Gonzalez C A L, and Brown J S 2001 Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 430-9
5. Bergman C M, Fryxell J M, Gates C C, and Fortin D 2001 Ungulate foraging strategies: Energy maximizing or time minimizing? Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 289-300
6. Bergman C M, Schaefer J A, and Luttich S N 2000 Caribou movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia (Berlin) 123: 364-74
7. Bissonette J A and Storch I 2002 Fragmentation: Is the message clear? Conservation Ecology 6: 14 (available at http://www.consecol.org/vol6/ iss2/art14/)
8. Bissonette J A and Storch I 2003 Understanding fragmentation: Getting closer to 42. Conservation Ecology 7: R5 (available at http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss2/resp5/)
9. Bradshaw C J A, Boutin S, and Hebert D M 1998 Energetic implications of disturbance caused by petroleum exploration to woodland caribou. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 1319-24
10. Colman J E, Jacobsen B W, and Reimers E 2001 Summer response distances of Svalbard reindeer Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus to provocation by humans on foot. Wildlife Biology 7: 275-83
11. County Administration Boards 2000 Ren2000 [ArcIMS]-The Reindeer Husbandry Database (Version 2.0). WWW document, http://www.Ren2000.se
12. Dyer S J, O'Neill J P, Wasel S M, and Boutin S 2001 Avoidance of industrial development by woodland caribou. Journal of Wildlife Management 65: 531-42
13. Etzenhouser M J, Owens M K, Spalinger D E, and Murden S B 1998 Foraging behavior of browsing ruminants in a heterogeneous landscape. Landscape Ecology 13: 55-64
14. Fenske-Crawford T J, and Niemi G J 1997 Predation of artificial ground nests at two types of edges in a forest-dominated landscape. Condor 99: 14-24
15. Johnson C J, Parker K L, and Heard D C 2001 Foraging across a variable landscape: Behavioral decisions made by woodland caribou at multiple spatial scales. Oecologia (Berlin) 127: 590-602
16. Krebs C J 2001 Ecology: The Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance. San Francisco, CA, Benjamin Cummings
17. National Land Survey of Sweden 1998 Geographical Sweden Data: Roads from the Blue Map, Metria. Stockholm, National Land Survey of Sweden
18. Nellemann C, Vistnes I, Jordhoy P, Strand O, and Newton A 2003 Progressive impact of piecemeal infrastructure development on wild reindeer. Biological Conservation 113: 307-17
19. Nikolakaki P 2004 A GIS site-selection process for habitat creation: Estimating connectivity of habitat patches. Landscape and Urban Planning 68: 77-94
20. Ostro L E T, Young T P, Silver S C, and Koontz F W 1999 A Geographic Information System method for estimating home range size. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 748-55
21. Robbins C T 1993 Energy requirements for maintenance: II, Activity. In Cunha T J (ed) Wildlife Feeding and Nutrition. San Diego, CA, Academic Press: 128-43
22. Rothley K 2005 Finding and filling the "cracks" in resistance surfaces for least-cost modeling. Ecology and Society 10 (available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art4/)
23. Rowland M M, Wisdom M J, Johnson B K, and Kie J G 2000 Elk distribution and modeling in relation to roads. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 672-84
24. Skarin A, Danell Ö, Bergström R, and Moen J 2007 Summer habitat preferences of GPS-collared reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Wildlife Biology 13: Xx-xx
25. Taylor P D, Fahrig L, Henein K, and Merriam G 1993 Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos 68: 571-3
26. Theobald D M 2005 A note on creating robust resistance surfaces for computing functional landscape connectivity. Ecology and Society 10 (available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss2/resp1/)
27. Tischendorf L and Fahrig L 2000 How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecology 15: 633-41
28. Trombulak S C and Frissell C A 2000 Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Conservation Biology 14: 18-30
29. Van Dyck H and Baguette M 2005 Dispersal behaviour in fragmented landscapes: Routine or special movements? Basic and Applied Ecology 6: 535-45
30. Vistnes I, Nellemann C, Jordhøy P, and Strand O 2002 Infrastructure as barriers to wild reindeer migration. Rangifer Report No. 6: 109