An automated modelling approach for dynamic performance evaluation of mechatronic multibody systems

Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 545-572

  Li, Yingzhe ^a   Lin, Zhongqin ^a   Wang, Hao ^a   Chen, Yong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Linear graph; Mechatronic multibody system; Modelica Dymola; Object oriented approach

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATE SOLUTION; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS; LINEAR GRAPH; MECHANICAL COMPONENTS; MODELICA; MULTI BODY SYSTEMS; OBJECT ORIENTED APPROACH;

KINEMATICS;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 35448936815     PISSN: 13873954     EISSN: 17445051     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13873950701381728     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aubert, V. and Garcia-Sabiro, S., 1999, Paper presented at FDL 1999: 2nd Forum on Design Languages, France, 1-3 September.
2. Broenink, J.F., 1997, Bond-graph modeling in Modelica. In: W. Hahn, A. Lehmann, W. Borutzky and H. Ziegler (Eds) Simulation in Industry, Ninth European Simulation Symposium, ESS'97, Passau, Germany, 19-23 October.
3. Park, H.C. and Kim, T.G., 1998, A relational algebraic framework for VHDL models management. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International, 15, 43-55.
4. Roe, P.H. (Ed), 1966, Networks and Systems (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
5. Koenig, H.E., Tokad, Y. and Kesavan, H.K., 1967, Analysis of Discrete Physical Systems (New York: McGraw-Hill).
6. Andrew, G.C. and Kesavan, H.K., 1975, The vector-network model: A new approach to vector dynamics. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 10, 57-75.
7. Li, T.W. and Andrews, G.C., 1986, Application of the vector-network method to constrained mechanical systems. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions and Automation in Design, 108, 471-480. M.A.Sc. thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
8. Wittenburg, J. and Wolz, U., 1985, Paper presented at ASME Design Engineering Conference, Cincinnati, OH, 10-13 September.
9. McPhee, J., 1996, On the use of linear graph theory in multibody system dynamics. Nonlinear Dynamics, 9, 73-90.
10. McPhee, J., Ishac, M.G. and Andrews, G.C., 1996, Wittenburg's formulation of multibody dynamics equations from a graph-theoretic perspective. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 31, 201-213.
11. McPhee, J., 1998, Automatic generation of motion equations for planar mechanical systems using the new set of "Branch Coordinates". Mechanism and Machine Theory, 33, 805-823.
12. Schmitke, C. and McPhee, J., 2003, Effective use of subsystem models in multibody and mechatronic system dynamics. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 1, 139-159.
13. Shi, P., 1998, Flexible multibody dynamics: A new approach using virtual work and graph theory. PhD thesis, Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
14. McPhee, J., Schmike, C. and Redmond, S., 2004, dynamic modeling of mechatronic multibody systems with symbolic computing and linear graph theory. Mathemtical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical System, 3, 1-23.
15. Schmtike, C. and McPhee, J., 2005, Forming equivalent subsystem components to facilitate the modelling of mechatronic multibody systems. Multibody System Dynamics, 14, 81-109.
16. Han, L., Paredis, C.J.J. and Khosla, P.K., 2001, Paper presented at 2001 Summer Computer Simulation Conference, Orlando, FL, 15-19 July.
17. Diaz-Calderon, A., Paredis, C.J.J. and Khosla, P.K., 2000, Automatic generation of system-level dynamic equations for mechatronic systems. Computer-Aided Design, 32, 339-354.
18. Rowell, D. (Ed), 2004, Linear Graph Modeling: Two-Port Energy Transducing Elements (Cambridge, MA: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), pp. 1-26.
19. Rowell, D. (Ed), 2004, Linear Graph Modeling: State Equation Formulation (Cambridge, MA: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology), pp. 1-38.
20. McPhee, J., Shi, P. and Piedboeuf, J.-C., 2002, Dynamics of multibody systems using virtual work and symbolic programming. Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, 8, 137-155.
21. Anderson, M., 1994, Object-oriented modeling and simulation of hybrid systems. PhD thesis, Department of Automatic Control, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden.
22. Szykman, S., 2000, Design respositories: Engineering design's new knowledge base. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 15, 48-55.
23. Sinha, R., Paredis, C.J.J. and Khosla, P.K., 2000, Paper presented at Proceedings 2000 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Behavioral Modeling and Simulation, Orlando, FL, 19-20 October.
24. Devedzic, V., 1999, A survey of modern knowledge modeling techniques. Expert Systems With Applications, 17, 275-294.
25. Soejima, S., 2000, Examples of usage and the spread of Dymola within Toyota. In: Modelica Workshop 2000 Proceedings, Lund. Sweden, pp. 55-60. Proceedings of the 1st Modelica Conference 2000, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, 23-24 October, 2000.
26. Modelica Association, 2004, Modelica - A unified object-oriented language for physical systems modeling, language specification version 2.1.
27. Elmqvist, H. and Mattsson, S.E., 1998, Paper presented at the 12th European Simulation Multiconference, Manchester, UK.