Legislative representation in a single-member versus multiple-member district system: The Arizona state legislature

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 337-344

  Richardson, Lilliard E ^a   Russell, Brian E ^b   Cooper, Christopher A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science   (United States)

^c WESTERN CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543134704     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591290405700214     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adams, Greg D. 1996. "Legislative Effects of Single-Member vs. Multi-Member Districts." American Journal of Political Science 40: 129-44.
2. Arceneaux, Kevin. 2001. "The 'Gender Gap' in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question." Political Research Quarterly 54: 143-60.
3. Arizona Legislative Information System (ALIS), www.azleg.state.us
4. Arizona News Service. 1999. Guide to the 44th Legislature: First Regular Session. Phoenix: Arizona News Service.
5. Barone, Michael, William Lilley III, and Laurence DeFranco. 1998. State Legislative Elections: Voting Patterns and Demographics. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly.
6. Berman, David R. 1998. Arizona Politics and Government: The Quests for Autonomy, Democracy, and Development. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
7. Bullock, Charles S. III, and David W. Brady. 1983. "Party, Constituency, and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. Senate." Legislative Studies Quarterly 8: 29-43
8. Cox, Gary W. 1990. "Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems." American Journal of Political Science 34: 903-35.
9. Dougan, William R., and Michael C. Munger. 1989. "The Rationality of Ideology." Journal of Law and Economics 32: 119-42.
10. Dow, Jay K. 1998. "A Spatial Analysis of Candidate in Dual Member Districts: The 1989 Chilean Senatorial Elections." Public Choice 97: 119-42.
11. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
12. Flanagan, Timothy J., Debra Cohen, and Pauline Gasdow Brennan. 1993, "Crime Control Ideology Among New York State Legislators." Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 411-22.
13. Fowler, Linda L. 1982. "How Interest Groups Select Issues for Rating Voting Records of Members of the U.S. Congress." Legislative Studies Quarterly 7: 401-13.
14. Herring, Mary. 1990. "Legislative Responsiveness to Black Constituents in Three Deep South States." Journal of Politics 52: 740-58.
15. Hogan, Robert E. 2001. "The Influence of State and District Conditions on Representation of Women in U.S. State Legislatures," American Politics Research 29: 4-24.
16. Jackson, John E., and David C. King. 1989. "Public Goods, Private Interests, and Representation." American Political Science Review 83: 1143-64.
17. Jewell, Malcolm E. 1981. "The State of Legislative Research." Legislative Studies Quarterly 6: 1-25.
18. Jewell, Malcolm E. 1982. Representation in State Legislatures. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
19. Kalt, Joseph P., and Mark A. Zupan. 1984, "Capture and Ideology in the Economic Theory of Politics."American Economic Review 74: 279-300.
20. Kau, James B., and Paul H. Rubin. 1982. Congressmen, Constituents, and Contributors. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
21. King, James D. 2000. "Changes in Professionalism in the U.S. State Legislatures." Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 327-44.
22. _. 2002. "Single-Member Districts and the Representation of Women in American State Legislatures: The Effects of Electoral Systems Change." State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2: 161-75.
23. Kuklinski, James H., James D. Nowlan, and Philip D. Habel. 2001. "Voting for the Illinois House: Experience and Lessons from the Illinois Laboratory." Illinois Assembly on Political Representation and Alternative Electoral Systems. IGPA, University of Illinois.
24. MacRae, Duncan. 1952. "The Relation Between Roll-Call Votes and Constituencies in the Massachusetts House of Representatives." American Political Science Review 46: 1046-55.
25. Magar, Eric, Marc R. Rosenblum, and David Samuels. 1998. "On the Absence of Centripetal Incentives in Double-Member Districts: The Case of Chile." Comparative Political Studies 31: 714-39.
26. McArthur, John, and Stephen V. Marks. 1988. "Constituent Interest vs. Legislator Ideology: The Role of Political Opportunity Cost." Economic Inquiry 26: 461-70.
27. Moncrief, Gary, and Joel A. Thompson. 1992. "Electoral Structure and State Legislative Representation."Journal of Politics 54:246-57.
28. Moncrief, Gary, Joel A. Thompson, and William Cassie. 1996. "Revisiting the State of U.S. Legislative Research." Legislative Studies Quarterly 21: 301-35.
29. Nicholson-Crotty, Sean, and Kenneth J. Meier. 2002, "Size Doesn't Matter: In Defense of Single State Studies." State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2: 411-22.
30. Overby, L. Marvin. 1991. "Assessing Constituency Influence: Congressional Voting On the Nuclear Freeze, 1982-83." Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 297-312.
31. Peltzman, Sam. 1984. "Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting." Journal of Law and Economics 27: 181-210.
32. Poole, Keith. 1981. "Dimensions of Interest Group Evaluation of the U.S. Senate 1969-1978." American Journal of Political Science 25: 9-67.
33. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1991. "Patterns of Congressional Voting." American Journal of Political Science 35: 228-78.
34. Ray, David. 1982. "The Sources of Voting Cues in Three States." Journal of Politics 44: 1074-87.
35. Reingold, Beth. 1992. "Concepts of Representation Among Female and Male State Legislators." Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 509-37.
36. Richardson, Lilliard E., Jr., and Michael C. Munger. 1990. "Shirking, Representation, and Congressional Behavior: Voting on the 1983 Amendments to the Social Security Act." Public Choice 67: 11-33.
37. Rosenthal, Alan. 1998. The Decline of Representative Democracy. Washington DC: CQ Press.
38. Schiller, Wendy J. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Snyder, James M., Jr. 1992. "Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings." Legislative Studies Quarterly 17: 319-45.
40. Thomas, Sue. 1991. "The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies." Journal of Politics 53: 958-76.
41. Weisberg, Herbert F. 1978. "Evaluating Theories of Congressional Roll-Call Voting." American Journal of Political Science 22: 554-77.
42. Welch, Susan, and Donley T. Studlar. 1990. "Multi-Member Districts and the Representation of Women: Evidence From Britain and the United States." Journal of Politics 52: 391-412.
43. Wink, Kenneth, C. Don Livingston, and James C. Garand. 1996. "Dispositions, Constituencies, and Cross-Pressures: Modeling Roll-Call Voting on the North American Free Trade Agreement in the U.S. House." Political Research Quarterly 49: 749-70.
44. Witt, Stephanie, and Gary Moncrief. 1993. "Religion and Roll Call Voting in Idaho." American Politics Quarterly 21: 140-49.