A spatial analysis of candidate competition in dual member districts: The 1989 Chilean senatorial elections

Public Choice

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 451-474

  Dow, Jay K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032285584     PISSN: 00485829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005014611991     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Adams, J. and Merrill III, S. (1998a). A Downsian model of candidate competition in the 1988 French presidential election. Typescript. Santa Barbara: University of California.
2. Adams, J. and Merrill III, S. (1998b). Party structures and policy representation in multiparty elections: An application to Norwegian politics. Typescript. Santa Barbara: University of California.
3. Adams, G. (1996). Legislative effects of single-member vs. multi-member districts. American Journal of Political Science 40: 129-144.
4. Aldrich, J.H. and McKelvey, R.D. (1977). A method of scaling with applications to the 1968 and 1972 presidential elections. American Political Science Review 71: 111-130.
5. Anderson, T.W. and Amemiya, Y. (1988). The asymptotic normal distribution of estimators in factor analysis under general conditions. The Annals of Statistics 16: 759-771.
6. Angell, A. (1990). The Chilean elections of 1989. Electoral Studies 3: 241-245.
7. Angell, A. and Pollack, B. (1990). The Chilean elections of 1989 and the politics of the transition to democracy. Bulletin of Latin American Research 9: 1-23. Black, D. (1958). Theory of committees and elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Angell, A. and Pollack, B. (1990). The Chilean elections of 1989 and the politics of the transition to democracy. Bulletin of Latin American Research 9: 1-23. Black, D. (1958). Theory of committees and elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Brady, H.E. (1991). Traits versus issues: Factor versus ideal-point analysis of candidate thermometer ratings. In J.A. Stimson (Ed.), Political Analysis, Vol. II. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Burnett, B.G. (1970). Political groups in Chile. Austin: University of Texas Press.
11. Cahoon, L.S. and Hinich, M.J. (1976). A method for locating targets using range only. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 22: 217-225.
12. Cahoon, L.S., Hinich, M.J. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1978). A statistical multidimensional scaling method based on the spatial theory of voting. In P.C. Wang (Ed.), Graphical representation of multivariate data. New York: Academic Press.
13. Caviedes, C.N. (1991). Elections in Chile: The road toward redemocratization. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
14. Cox, G.W. (1987). Electoral equilibrium under alternative voting institutions. American Journal of Political Science 31: 82-108.
15. Cox, G.W. (1990a). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science 34: 903-935.
16. Cox, G.W. (1990b). Multicandidate spatial competition. In J.M. Enelow and M.J. Hinich (Eds.), Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Davis, S.K. (1984). A nonmetric test of spatial theories of elections. Political Methodology 10: 1-28.
18. Denzau, A., Kats, A. and Slutsky, S. (1985). Multi-agent equilibria with market share and ranking objectives. Social Choice and Welfare 2: 95-117.
19. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
20. Eaton, B.C. and Lipsey, R. (1975). The principle of minimum differentiation reconsidered: Some new developments in the theory of spatial competition. Review of Economic Studies 42: 27-50.
21. Endersby, J.W. and Hinich, M.J. (1992). The stability of voter perceptions: A comparison of candidate positions across time using the spatial theory of voting. Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modeling 16: 67-83.
22. Enelow, J.M. (1986). The linkage between predictive dimensions and candidate issue positions in American presidential elections: An examination of group based differences. Political Behavior 8: 245-261.
23. Enelow, J.M. (1988). A methodology for testing a new spatial model of elections. Quality and Quantity 22: 347-364.
24. Enelow, J.M. and Hinich, M.J. (1984). The spatial theory of voting: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Enelow, J.M. (1989). The locations of American presidential candidates: An empirical test of a new spatial model of elections. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 12: 461-470.
26. Enelow, J.M. (1994). A test of the predictive dimensions model in spatial voting theory. Public Choice 78: 155-170.
27. Enelow, J.M. and Hinich, M.J. (Eds.). (1990). Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Faundez, J. (1988). Marxism and democracy in Chile. New Haven: Yale University Press.
29. Garreton, M.A. (1989). The Chilean political process. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
30. Gill, F.G. (1966). The political system of Chile. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
31. Green, D.P. and Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of rational choice theory New Haven: Yale University Press.
32. Greenberg, J. and Shepsle, K. (1987). The effect of multiparty rewards in multiparty competition with entry. American Political Science Review 81: 525-537.
33. Greenberg, J. and Weber, S. (1985). Multiparty equilibria under proportional representation. American Political Science Review 79: 693-703.
34. Hinich, M.J. and Mungeer, M.C. (1994). Ideology and the theory of political choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
35. Hinich, M.J. (1996). Analytical politics. New York: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).
36. Hinich, M.J. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1970). Plurality maximization versus vote maximization: A spatial analysis with variable participation. American Political Science Review 64: 772-791.
37. Iversen, T. (1994). Political leadership and representation in West European democracies: A test of three models of voting. American Journal of Political Science 38: 45-74.
38. Jones, M.P. (1993). The political consequences of electoral laws in Latin America and the Caribbean. Electoral Studies 12: 59-75.
39. Langton, K.P. and Rapoport, R. (1976). Religion and leftist mobilization in Chile. Comparative Political Studies 9: 277-308.
40. Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty government. New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral systems and party systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Lin, T.-M., Chu, Y.-h. and Hinich, M.J. (1996). Conflict displacement and regime transition in Taiwan: A spatial analysis. World Politics (forthcoming).
43. Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments. In S.M. Lipset and S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross national perspectives. New York: The Free Press.
44. Macdonald, S.E., Listhaug, O. and Rabinowitz, G. (1991). Issues and party support in multiparty systems. American Political Science Review 85: 1107-1131.
45. Macdonald, S.E., Rabinowitz, G. and Listhaug, O. (1995). Political sophistication and models of issues voting. British Journal of Political Science 25: 453-483.
46. Merrill, S. III. (1994). A probabilistic model for the spatial distribution of party support in multiparty elections. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1190-1197.
47. Merrill, S. III. (1995). Discriminating between the directional and proximity spatial models of electoral competition. Electoral Studies 14: 273-287.
48. Palfrey, T.R. (1984). Spatial equilibrium with entry. Review of Economic Studies 51: 139-156.
49. Panzer, J. and Paredes, R. (1991). The role of economic issues in elections: The case of the 1988 Chilean presidential referendum. Public Choice 71: 51-59.
50. Poole, K. and Rosenthal, H. (1984). U.S. presidential elections 1968-1980: A spatial analysis. American Journal of Political Science 28: 282-312.
51. Portes, A. (1976). Occupation and lower-class political orientation in Chile. In A. Valenzuela and J.S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Chile: Politics and society. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
52. Rabinowitz, G. (1978). On the nature of political issues: Insights from a spatial analysis. American Journal of Political Science 70: 804-809.
53. Rabinowitz, G. and Macdonald, S.E. (1989). A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review 83: 93-121.
54. Rabinowitz, G., Macdonald, S.E. and Listhaug, O. (1991). Old players in a new game: Party strategy in multiparty systems. Comparative Political Studies 24: 147-185.
55. Rusk, J. and Weisberg, H. (1972). Perceptions of presidential candidates. Midwest Journal of Political Science 16: 388-410.
56. Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Schofield, N., Martin, A., Quin, K. and Whitford, A. (1998). Multiparty electoral competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A model based on the multinomial probit. Public Choice (forthcoming).
58. Schofield, N. (1998). A comparison of majoritarian and proportional electoral systems based on spatial modeling and 'rational' politicians. Typescript. St. Louis: Washington University.
59. Scott, D.W. (1992). Multivariate density estimation. New York: Wiley.
60. Scully, T.R. (1992). Rethinking the center: Party politics in nineteenth- and twentieth-century Chile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
61. Scully, T.R. (1995). Reconstructing party politics in Chile. In S. Mainwaring and T.R. Scully (Eds.), Building democratic institutions Stanford: Stanford University Press.
62. Shepsle, K.A. (1991). Models of multiparty electoral competition. New York: Harwood Academic.
63. Shepsle, K.A. and Cohen, R.N. (1990). Multiparty competition, entry and entry deterrence in spatial models of elections. In J.M. Enelow and M.J. Hinich (Eds.), Advances in the spatial theory of voting. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Taagepera, R. and Shugart, M.S. (1989). Seats and vote. New Haven: Yale University Press.
65. Valenzuela, A. (1985). Origins and characteristics of the Chilean system: A proposal for a parliamentary form of government. Working Paper No. 164, The Woodrow Wilson Center.
66. Valenzuela, S. and Valenzuela, A. (1985). Chile and the breakdown of democracy. In H.J. Wiarda and H.F. Kline (Eds.), Latin American politics and development. Boulder: Westview Press.
67. Valenzuela, A. and Valenzuela, S. (1986). Party opposition under the authoritarian regime. In A. Valenzuela and J.S. Valenzuela (Eds.), Military rule in Chile. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
68. Walker, I. (1993). Political alliances and the role of the centre: The Chilean Christian Democratic Party. In A. Angell and B. Pollack (Eds.), The legacy of dictatorship. Liverpool: Institute of Latin American Studies.
69. Weisberg, H. and Rusk, J. (1970). Dimensions of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review 64: 1167-1185.