On the absence of centripetal incentives in double-member districts the case of Chile

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 714-739

  Magar, Eric ^a   Rosenblum, Marc R ^a   Samuels, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039530829     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414098031006002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bolfvar Espinoza, Augusto. (1996). Systems of parties and representation during the transition to democracy in Chile. Sociologica, 11(30), 57-87.
2. Cox, Gary W. (1984). Electoral equilibrium in double member districts. Public Choice, 44(3), 443-451.
3. Cox, Gary W. (1985). Strategic electoral choice in multi-member districts: Approval voting in practice? American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 722-738.
4. Cox, Gary W. (1987). Electoral equilibrium under alternative voting institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 82-108.
5. Cox, Gary W. (1990a). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 903-935.
6. Cox, Gary W. (1990b). Multicandidate spatial competition. In James M. Enelow & Melvin J. Hinich (Eds.), Advances in the spatial theory of voting (175-198). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cox, Gary W. (1997). Making votes count: Coordination and entry in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8. Downs, Anthony. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
9. Editorial Américo Vespucio. (1989). Guía electoral: Las elecciones de diciembre [Electoral guide: The December elections]. Santiago, Chile: Author.
10. Garretón, Manuel Antonio. (1991). The political opposition and the party system. In Paul Drake & Iván Jaksic (Eds.), The struggle for democracy in Chile, 1982-1990. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
11. Guzmán, Eugenio A. (1993). Reflexiones sobre el sistema binominal [Reflections on the binomial system]. Estudios Públicos, 51, 303-330.
12. Haggard, Stephan, & Kaufman, Robert. (1995). The political economy of democratic transitions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Lacy, Dean, & Niou, Emerson. (1996). Elections in double-member districts with nonseparable voter preferences. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio State University.
14. Mainwaring, Scott. (1993). Presidentialism, multipartism, and democracy: The difficult combination. Comparative Political Studies, 26(2), 198-230.
15. McKelvey, Richard. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models, and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory, 12(3), 472-482.
16. Myerson, Roger B. (1993). Incentives to cultivate favored minorities under alternative electoral systems. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 856-869.
17. Rabkin, Rhoda. (1996). Redemocratization, electoral engineering, and party strategies in Chile, 1989-1995. Comparative Political Studies, 29(3), 335-356.
18. Rasmusen, Eric. (1994). Games and information. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
19. República de Chile. (1989, December 24). Nomina Oficial de Candidatos a Diputados [Official list of deputy candidates]. Santiago, Chile: Servicio Electoral.
20. República de Chile. (1993, August 24). Nómina Oficial de Candidatos a Diputados [Official list of deputy candidates]. Santiago, Chile: Servicio Electoral.
21. Sartori, Giovanni. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Schofield, Norman. (1978). Instability of simple dynamic games. Review of Economic Studies, 45(3), 575-594.
23. Scully, Timothy. (1994). Rethinking the center: Party politics in 19th and 20th century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Scully, Timothy. (1995). Reconstituting party politics in Chile. In Scott Mainwaring & Timothy Scully (Eds.), Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America (pp. 100-137). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25. Shugart, Matthew, & Carey, John. (1992). Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Siavelis, Peter. (1993). Nuevos argumentos y viejos supuestos: Simulaciones de sistemas electorales alternativos [New arguments and old assumptions: Simulations of alternative electoral systems]. Estudios Públicos, 51, 229-267.
27. Simon, Leo, & Zame, William. (1990). Discontinuous games and endogenous sharing rules. Econometrica, 58(4), 861-872.
28. Sniderman, Paul, Brody, Richard, & Tetlock, Philip. (1991). Reasoning and choice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Snyder, James M. (1990). Resource allocation in multiparty elections. American Journal of Political Science, 34(1), 59-73.
30. Valenzuela, Arturo. (1977). Political brokers in Chile: Local government in a centralized polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31. Valenzuela, Arturo. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes: Chile. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. Valenzuela, Arturo, & Siavelis, Peter. (1991). Ley electoral y estabilidad democrática: Un ejercicio de simulación para el caso de Chile [Electoral law and democratic stability: An exercise of simulation for the case of Chile]. Estudios Públicos, 43, 27-86.