Social choice and the indexing dilemma

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 633-648

  Fleurbaey, Marc ^a,b  

^a Centre universitaire des Saints Pères   (France)

^b IDEP   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35349016367     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-007-0248-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Arneson (1990) Primary goods reconsidered. Noûs 24:429-454
2. Arrow KJ (1963) Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York (2nd revised ed; 1st ed 1951)
3. Arrow KJ (1973) Some ordinalist-utilitarian notes on Rawls's theory of justice. J Philos 70:245-263
4. d'Aspremont C (1985) Axioms for social welfare orderings. In: Hurwicz L, Schmeidler D, Sonnenschein H (eds) Social goals and social organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. d'Aspremont C, Gevers L (1977) Equity and the informational basis of collective choice. Rev Econ Studies 44:199-210
6. Basu K (1994) On interpersonal comparison and the concept of equality. In Eichhorn W (eds) Models and measurement of welfare and inequality. Springer, Berlin
7. Bergson A (1954) On the concept of social welfare. Quart J Econ 68:233-252
8. Bordes G, Le Breton M (1989) Arrovian theorems with private alternatives domains and selfish individuals. J Econ Theory 47:257-281
9. Broome J (1991) Weighing goods. Blackwell, Oxford
10. Brun BC, Tungodden B (2004) Non-welfaristic theories of justice: is the intersection approach a solution to the indexing impasse?. Social Choice Welfare 22:49 60
11. Fleurbaey M (2003) On the informational basis of social choice. Social Choice Welfare 21:347-384
12. Fleurbaey M (2005) Health, wealth and fairness. J Public Econo Theory 7:253-284
13. Fleurbaey M, Hammond PJ (2004) Interpersonally comparable utility. In: Barbera S, Hammond PJ, Seidl C (eds) Handbook of utility theory, vol 2: extensions. Kluwer, Boston
14. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (2005) Fair social orderings when agents have unequal skills. Social Choice Welfare 24:93-128
15. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (2006) Fair income tax. Rev Econ Studies 73:55-83
16. Fleurbaey M, Mongin P (2005) The news of the death of welfare economics is greatly exaggerated. Social Choice Welfare 25:381-418
17. Fleurbaey M, Trannoy A (2003) The impossibility of a Paretian Egalitarian. Social Choice Welfare 21: 243-264
18. Gibbard A (1979) Disparate goods and Rawls's difference principle: a social choice theoretic treatment. Theory Decision 11:267-288
19. Kolm SC (1972) Justice et équité. Ed. du CNRS, Paris
20. Pattanaik P, Xu Y (2005) Relativism, dominance, and standard of living comparisons based on functionings, mimeo
21. Pazner E (1979) Equity, nonfeasible alternatives and social choice: a reconsideration of the concept of social welfare. In: Laffont JJ (eds) Aggregation and revelation of preferences. North-Holland, Amsterdam
22. Pazner E, Schmeidler D (1978) Egalitarian equivalent allocations: a new concept of economic equity. Quart J Econ 92:671-687
23. Rawls J (1982) Social unity and primary goods. In: Sen AK, Williams B (eds) Utilitarianism and Beyond. Maison des Sciences de l'Homme and Cambridge University Press, Paris/Cambridge
24. Rawls J (1993) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, Princeton
25. Rawls J (1999) A theory of justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
26. Robbins L (1932) An essay on the nature and significance of economics, McMillan, London (2nd revised ed, 1937)
27. Roemer JE (1996) Theories of distributive justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
28. Sen AK (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Holden Day, San Francisco
29. Sen AK (1991) On indexing primary goods and capabilities. mimeo
30. Sen AK (1992) Inequality re-examined. Oxford University Press, Oxford
31. Steinhaus H (1948) The problem of fair division. Econometrica 16:101-104