The impossibility of a Paretian egalitarian

Social Choice and Welfare

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 243-263

  Fleurbaey, Marc ^a   Trannoy, Alain ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PAU ET DES PAYS DE L'ADOUR   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE CERGY PONTOISE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242382517     PISSN: 01761714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00355-003-0258-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Atkinson AB, Bourguignon F (1982) The comparison of multi-dimensioned distributions of economic status. Rev Econ Stud 49: 181-201
2. Bordes G, Campbell D, Le Breton M (1995) Arrow's theorem for economic domains and Edgeworth hyperboxes. Int Econ Rev 36: 441-454
3. Chipman J (1977) An empirical implication of Auspitz-Lieben-Edgeworth-Pareto complementarity. J Econ Theory 14: 228-231
4. Diamantaras E, Thomson W (1991) A refinement and extension of the no-envy concept. Econ Letters 33: 217-22
5. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (1997) Utilitarianism versus fairness in welfare economics. In: Salles M, Weymark JA (eds) Justice, political liberalism and utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge (forthcoming)
6. Fleurbaey M, Maniquet F (1999) Fair social orderings with unequal production skills. Soc Choice Welfare (forthcoming)
7. Gevers L (1986) Walrasian social choice: Some simple axiomatic approaches. In: Heller W et al. (eds) Social choice and public decision making, Essays in Honor of K. J. Arrow, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91-114
8. Guesnerie R (1995) A contribution to the pure theory of taxation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Hadar J, Russel W (1974) Stochastic dominance choice under uncertainty. In: Balch MS, Mc Fadden DL, Wu SY (eds) Essays on economic behavior under uncertainty. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 133-150
10. Hardy GH, Littlewood JE, Polya G (1952) Inequalities, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11. Kolm SC (1972) Justice et équité, Ed. du CNRS
12. Kolm SC (1977) Multidimensional egalitarianisms. Q J Econ 91: 1-13
13. Koshevoy G (1995) Multivariate Lorenz Majorizations. Soc Choice Welfare 12: 93-102
14. Koshevoy G (1998) The Lorenz Zonotope and multivariate majorizations. Soc Choice Welfare 15: 1-14
15. Koshevoy G, Mosler K (1996) The Lorenz zonoïd of a multivariate distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 91(434): 873-882
16. Le Breton M (1986) Essais sur les fondements de l'analyse économique de l'inégalité. These pour le Doctorat d'Etat, Université de Rennes I
17. Marshall A, Olkin I (1979) Inequalities: Theory of majorization and its applications. Academic Press, New York
18. Moulin H, Thomson W (1988) Can everyone benefit from growth? J Math Econ 17: 339-345
19. Moulin H, Thomson W (1997) Axiomatic analysis of resource allocation problems. In: Arrow KJ, Sen A, Suzumura K (eds) Social choice re-examined, vol. 1. Macmillan, London: St. Martin's Press, New-York
20. Mosler K (1991) Multidimensional Welfarism. In: Eichhorn W (ed) Models and measurement of welfare and inequality. Springer, Berlin, Heidelleig New York, pp 808-820
21. Pazner E, Schmeidler D (1978) Decentralization and income distribution in socialist economies. Econ Inquiry 16: 257-264
22. Rawls J (1982) Social unity and primary goods. In: Sen A, Williams B (eds) Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
23. Redekop J (1991) Social welfare functions on restricted economic domains. J Econ Theory 53: 396-427
24. Rietveld P (1990) Multidimensional inequality comparisons. Econ Letters 32: 187-192
25. Saposnick R (1981) Rank dominance in income distribution. Pub Choice 36: 147-151
26. Saposnick R (1983) On evaluating income distributions: rank dominance, the Suppes-Sen grading principle of justice, and Pareto optimality. Publ Choice 40: 329-336
27. Sen AK (1970a) Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco
28. Sen AK (1970b) The impossibility of a Paretian liberal. J Polit Econ 78: 152-157
29. Shorrocks AK (1983) Ranking income distributions. Economica 50: 3-17
30. Suppes P (1966) Some formal models of grading principles. Synthese 6: 284-306
31. Suzumura K (1981a) On Pareto-efficiency and the No-envy concept of equity. J Econ Theory 25: 367-379
32. Suzumura K (1981b) On the possibility of "fair" collective choice rule. Int Econ Rev 22: 351-364
33. Suzumura K (1983) Rational choice, collective decisions, and social welfare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
34. Tadenuma K (2002) Efficiency first or equity first? Two principles and rationality of social choice. J Econ Theory 104(2): 462-472
35. Tobin J (1970) On limiting the domain of inequality. J Law Econ 13: 263-277
36. Thomson W (1983) The fair division of a fixed supply among a growing population. Math Oper Res 8: 243-263
37. Tsui KY (1995) Multidimensional generalizations of the relative and absolute inequality indices: The Atkinson-Kolm-Sen approach. J Econ Theory 67: 251-265
38. Varian H (1974) Equity, envy, and efficiency. J Econ Theory 9: 63-91
39. Varian H (1976) Two problems in the theory of fairness. J Publ Econ 5: 249-260