Inbreeding depression in the gynodioecious shrub hebe subalpina (Scrophulahaceae)

New Zealand Journal of Botany

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 241-247

  Delph, Lynda F ^a   Lloyd, David G ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Gynodioecious; Hebe subalpina; Inbreeding depression; Male sterility

Indexed keywords

HEBE SUBALPINA; SCROPHULARIACEAE;

GROWTH; GYNODIOECY; INBREEDING DEPRESSION; PLANTING REGIME;

EID: 0029660306     PISSN: 0028825X     EISSN: 11758643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0028825X.1996.10410688     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Antonovics, J., 1968. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. V. Evolution of self-fertility. Heredity, 23:219–238.
2. Ashman, T.-L., 1992. The relative importance of inbreeding and maternal sex in determining progeny fitness in Sidalcea oregana ssp. spicata, a gynodioecious plant. Evolution, 46:1862–1874.
3. Bell, G., 1985. On the function of flowers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 224:223–265.
4. Charlesworth, D., 1985. “Distribution of dioecy and self-incompatibility in angiosperms”. In Evolution:essays in honour of John Maynard Smith, Edited by:Greenwood, P. J., and Slatkin, M., 237–268. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. In
5. Charlesworth, B., and Charlesworth, D., 1978. A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American naturalist, 112:975–997.
6. Charlesworth, D., Morgan, M. T., and Charlesworth, B., 1990. Inbreeding depression, genetic load, and the evolution of outcrossing rates in a multilocus system with no linkage. Evolution, 44:1469–1489.
7. Darwin, C., 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species, London:Murray.
8. del Castillo, R. F., 1993. Consequences of male sterility in Phacelia dubia. Evolutionary trends in plants, 7:15–21.
9. Delph, L. F., 1990a. The evolution of gender dimorphism in New Zealand Hebe (Scrophulariaceae) species. Evolutionary trends in plants, 4:85–97.
10. Delph, L. F., 1990b. Sex-differential resource allocation patterns in the subdioecious shrub Hebe subalpina. Ecology, 71:1342–1351.
11. Delph, L. F., and Lloyd, D. G., 1992. Environmental and genetic control of gender in the dimorphic shrub Hebe subalpina. Evolution, 45:1957–1964.
12. Diggle, P. K., 1992. “Development and the evolution of plant reproductive characters”. In Ecology and evolution of plant reproduction, Edited by:Wyatt, R., 326–355. New York:Chapman & Hall. In
13. Dudash, M. R., 1990. Relative fitness of selfed and outcrossed progeny in a self-compatible, protandrous species, Sabatia angularis L. (Gentianaceae):a comparison in three environments. Evolution, 44:1129–1139.
14. Frank, S. A., 1989. The evolutionary dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. American naturalist, 133:345–376.
15. Frankel, O. H., 1940. Studies in Hebe. II. The significance of male sterility in the genetic system. Journal of genetics, 40:171–184.
16. Garnock-Jones, P., and Molloy, B. P. J., 1982. Protandry and inbreeding depression in Hebe amplexicaulis (Scrophulariaceae). New Zealand journal of botany, 20:401–404.
17. Gouyon, P.-H., and Couvet, D., 1987. “A conflict between two sexes, females and hermaphrodites”. In The evolution of sex and its consequences, Edited by:Stearns, S. C., 245–261. Basel:Birkhauser Verlag. In
18. Jain, S. K., 1978. Breeding system in Limnanthes alba:several alternative measures. American journal of botany, 65:272–275.
19. Johnston, M. O., 1992. Effects of cross and self-fertilization on progeny fitness in Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica. Evolution, 46:688–702.
20. Johnston, M. O., and Schoen, D. J., 1994. On the measurement of inbreeding depression. Evolution, 48:1735–1741.
21. Jolls, C. L., and Chenier, T. C., 1989. Gynodioecy in Silene vulgaris (Caryophyllaceae):progeny success, experimental design, and maternal effects. American journal of botany, 76:1360–1367.
22. Karron, J. D., and Marshall, D. L., 1990. Fitness consequences of multiple paternity in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Evolution, 44:260–268.
23. Kesseli, R., and Jain, S. K., 1984. An ecological genetic study of gynodioecy in Limnanthes douglasii (Limnanthaceae). American journal of botany, 71:775–786.
24. Kohn, J., 1988. Why be female?. Nature, 335:431–433.
25. Lande, R., and Schemske, D. W., 1985. The evolution of self-fertilization and inbreeding depression in plants. I. Genetic models. Evolution, 39:24–40.
26. Lande, R., Schemske, D. W., and Schultz, S. T., 1994. High inbreeding depression, selective interference among loci, and the threshold selfing rate for purging recessive lethal mutations. Evolution, 48:965–978.
27. Lewis, D., 1941. Male sterility in natural populations of hermaphrodite plants. New phytologist, 40:56–63.
28. Lewontin, R. C., 1974. The genetic basis of evolutionary change, New York:Columbia University Press.
29. Lloyd, D. G., 1965. Evolution of self-compatibility and racial differentiation in Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contributions from The Gray Herbarium of Harvard University, 195:3–134.
30. Lloyd, D. G., 1974. Theoretical sex ratios of dioecious and gynodioecious angiosperms. Heredity, 32:11–34.
31. Lloyd, D. G., 1975. The maintenance of gynodioecy and androdioecy in angiosperms. Genetica, 45:325–339.
32. Lloyd, D. G., 1976. The transmission of genes via pollen and ovules in gynodioecious angiosperms. Theoretical population biology, 9:299–316.
33. Maki, M., 1992. Fixation indices and genetic diversity in hermaphroditic and gynodioecious populations of Japanese Chionographis (Liliaceae). Heredity, 68:329–336.
34. Maki, M., 1993. Outcrossing and fecundity advantage of females in gynodioecious Chionographis japonica var. kurohimensis (Liliaceae). American journal of botany, 80:629–634.
35. Maurice, S., Belhassen, E., Couvet, D., and Gouyon, P.-H., 1994. Evolution of dioecy:can nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions select for maleness?. Heredity, 73:346–354.
36. McCusker, A., 1962. Gynodioecism in Leucopogon melaleucoides A. Cunn. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales, 87:286–289.
37. Mitchell-Olds, T., and Waller, D. M., 1985. Relative performance of selfed and outcrossed progeny in Impatiens capensis. Evolution, 39:533–544.
38. Perrot, V., Dommée, B., and Jacquard, P., 1982. Étude expérimentale de la concurrence entre individus issus d'autofécondation et d'allofécondation chez le thym (Thymus vulgaris L.). Acta oecologia/Oecologia plantarum, 3:171–184.
39. Sakai, A. K., Karoly, K., and Weiler, S. G., 1989. Inbreeding depression in Schiedea globosa and S. salicaria (Caryophyllaceae), subdioecious and gynodioecious Hawaiian species. American journal of botany, 76:437–444.
40. Schemske, D. W., 1983. Breeding system and habitat effects of fitness components in three neotropical Costus (Zingiberaceae). Evolution, 37:523–539.
41. Schmitt, J., and Ehrhardt, D. W., 1987. A test of the sibcompetition hypothesis for out-crossing advantage in Impatiens capensis. Evolution, 41:579–590.
42. Schmitt, J., and Ehrhardt, D. W., 1990. Enhancement of inbreeding depression by dominance and suppression in Impatiens capensis. Evolution, 44:269–278.
43. Shykoff, J. A., 1988. Maintenance of gynodioecy in Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae):stage-specific fecundity and viability selection. American journal of botany, 75:844–850.
44. Stephenson, A. G., and Bertin, R. I., 1983. “Male competition, female choice, and sexual selection in plants”. In Pollination biology, Edited by:L., Real. 109–149. Orlando:Academic Press. In
45. Thomson, J. D., and Barrett, S. C. H., 1981. Selection for outcrossing, sexual selection, and the evolution of dioecy in plants. American naturalist, 118:443–449.