Antibody response to Salmonella: Its induction and role in protection against avian enteric salmonellosis

Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 873-881

  Beal, Richard K ^a   Smith, Adrian L ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ANIMAL HEALTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antibody; Bursectomy; Chicken; Enteric; Enteritidis; Food poisoning; Salmonella; Typhimurium

Indexed keywords

BACTERIUM ANTIBODY; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; FLUOROURACIL; SALMONELLOSIS VACCINE; TESTOSTERONE PROPIONATE;

ANTIBODY PRODUCTION; ANTIBODY RESPONSE; ANTIBODY TITER; B LYMPHOCYTE; BIRD; BURSECTOMY; CHICKEN; CROSS REACTION; DRUG SYNTHESIS; ENTERITIS; FOOD CONTAMINATION; HUMAN; IMMUNITY; INFECTION CONTROL; LYMPHOCYTE DEPLETION; NONHUMAN; PUBLIC HEALTH; REVIEW; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SALMONELLA ENTERITIDIS; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; SALMONELLOSIS; SEROTYPE;

ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, BACTERIAL; B-LYMPHOCYTES; CHICKENS; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; HUMANS; IMMUNITY, NATURAL; INTESTINAL DISEASES; SALMONELLA ENTERICA; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL;

EID: 35349013051     PISSN: 14787210     EISSN: 17448336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/14787210.5.5.873     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. De Buck J, Van Immerseel F, Haesebrouck F, Ducatelle R. Colonization of the chicken reproductive tract and egg contamination by Salmonella. J Appl. Microbiol. 97(2), 233-245 (2004).
2. Little CL, Walsh S, Hucklesby L et al. Salmonella contamination in non-UK produced shell eggs on retail sale in some regions of England. Euro. Surveill. 11(11), E061123-EO61124 (2006).
3. Shivaprasad HL. Fowl typhoid and pullorum disease. Rev. Sci. Tech. 19(2), 405-424 (2000).
4. Zhang-Barber L, Turner AK, Barrow PA. Vaccination for control of Salmonella in poultry. Vaccine 17(20-21), 2538-2545 (1999).
5. Gast RK, Beard CW. Age-related changes in the persistence and pathogenicity of Salmonella typhimurium in chicks. Poult. Sci. 68(11), 1454-1460 (1989).
6. Beal RK, Powers C, Wigley P, Barrow PA, Smith AL. Temporal dynamics of the cellular, humoral and cytokine responses in chickens during primary and secondary infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Avian Pathol. 33(l), 25-33 (2004).
7. Smith HW. The use of live vaccines in experimental Salmonella gallinarum infection in chickens with observations on their interference effect. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 54(3), 419-432 (1956).
8. Barrow PA, Lovell MA. Experimental infection of egg-laying hens with Salmonella enteritidis phage type 4. Avian Pathol. 20, 335-348 (1991).
9. Keller LH, Benson CE, Krotec K, Eckroade RJ. Salmonella enteritidis colonization of the reproductive tract and forming and freshly laid eggs of chickens. Infect Immun. 63(7), 2443-2449 (1995).
10. Shivaprasad HL, Timoney JF, Morales S, Lucio B, Baker RC. Pathogenesis of Salmonella enteritidis infection in laying chickens. I. Studies on egg transmission, clinical signs, fecal shedding. and serologic responses. Avian Dis. 34(3), 548-557 (1990).
11. Thiagarajan D, Saeed AM, Asem EK. Mechanism of transovarian transmission of Salmonella enteritidis in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 73(l), 89-98 (1994).
12. Beal RK, Wigley P, Powers C et al. Age at primary infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the chicken influences persistence of infection and subsequent immunity to re-challenge. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 100(3-4). 151-164 (2004).
13. Barrow PA, Bumstead N, Marston K, Lovell MA, Wigley P. Faecal shedding and intestinal colonization of Salmonella enterica in in-bred chickens: the effect of host-genetic background. Epidemiol. Infect. 132(l), 117-126 (2004).
14. Beal RK, Powers C, Wigley P et al. A: strong antigen-specific T-cell response is associated with age and genetically dependent resistance to avian enteric salmonellosis. Infect. Immun. 73(11), 7509-7516 (2005).
15. Berthelot-Herault F, Mompart F, Zygmunt MS, Dubray G, Duchet-Suchaux M. Antibody responses in the serum and gut of chicken lines differing in cecal carriage of Salmonella enteritidis. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 96(1-2), 43-52 (2003).
16. Hassan JO, Mockett AP, Catty D, Barrow PA. Infection and reinfection of chickens with Salmonella typhimurium. bacteriology and immune responses. Avian Dis. 35(4), 809-819 (1991).
17. Higgins DA. Physical and chemical properties of fowl immunoglobulins. Vet Bull. 45(3), 139-151 (1975).
18. Tizard I. The avian antibody response. Semin. Avian Exot. Pet. 11(1), 2-14 (2002).
19. Higgins DA. Fractionation of fowl immunoglobulins. Res. Vet. Sci. 21(1), 94-99 (1976).
20. Lebacq-Verheyden AM, Vaerman JP, Heremans JF. Quantification and distribution of chicken immunoglobulins IgA, IgM and IgG in serum and secretions. Immunology 27(4), 683-692 (1974).
21. Leslie GA, Clem LW. Phylogeny of immunoglobulin structure and function. 3. Immunoglobulins of the chicken. J. Exp. Med. 130(6), 1337-1352 (1969).
22. Van Meter R, Good RA, Cooper MD. Ontogeny of circulating immunoglobulin in normal, bursectomized and irradiated chickens. J. Immunol. 102(2), 370-374 (1969).
23. Bienenstock J, Perey DY, Gauldie J, Underdown BJ. Chicken A: physicochemical and immunochemical characteristics. J. Immunol. 110(21),524-533 (1973).
24. Lebacq-Verheyden AM, Vaerman JP, Heremans JF. A possible homologue of mammalian IgA in chicken serum and secretions. Immunology 22(1), 165-175 (1972).
25. Mockett APA. Monoclonal antibodies used to isolate IgM from chicken bile and avian sera and to detect specific IgM in chicken sera. Avian Pathol. 15(3),337-349 (1986).
26. Peppard JV, Hobbs SM. Jackson LE, Rose ME, Mockett AP. Biochemical characterization of chicken secretory component. Eur. J. lmmunol. 6(3), 225-229 (1986).
27. Withanage GS, Wigley P, Kaiser P et al. Cytokine and chemokine responses associated with clearance of a primary Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in the chicken and in protective immunity to rechallenge. Infect. Immun. 73(8), 5173-5182 (2005).
28. Chart H, Rowe B. BaskerviLle A, Humphrey TJ. Serological response of chickens to Salmonella enteritidis infection. Epidemiol. Infect. 104(1), 63-71 (1990).
29. Hassan JO, Barrow PA, Mockett AP, McLeod S. Antibody response to experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in chickens measured by ELISA. Vet. Rec. 126(21), 519-522 (1990).
30. Rose ME, Orlans E, Payne AW, Hesketh P. The origin of IgA in chicken bile: its rapid active transport from blood. Eur. J. Immunol. 11(7), 561-564 (1981).
31. Baay MF. Huis in't Veld JH. Alternative antigens reduce cross-reactions in an ELISA for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74(3), 243-247 (1993).
32. Nicholas RA, Cullen GA. Development and application of an ELISA for detecting antibodies to Salmonella enteriddis in chicken flocks. Vet. Rec. 128(4), 74-76 (1991).
33. Beal RK, Wigley P, Powers C, Barrow PA, Smith AL. Cross-reactive cellular and humoral immune responses to Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis are associated with protection to heterologous re-challenge. Vet Immunol. Immunopathol. 114(1-2), 84-93 (2006).
34. Dueger EL, House JK, Heithoff DM, Mahan MJ. Salmonella DNA adenine methylase mutants elicit protective immune responses to homologous and heterologous serovars in chickens. Infect. Immun. 69(12), 7950-7954 (2001).
35. Hu J, Bumstead N, Barrow P et al. Resistance to salmonellosis in the chicken is linked to NRAMP1 and TNC. Genome Res. 7(7), 693-704 (1997).
36. Leveque G, Forgetta V, Morroll S et al. Allelic variation in TLR4 is linked to susceptibility to Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection in chickens. Infect. Immun. 71(3), 1116-1124 (2003).
37. Liu W, Miller MM, Lamont SJ. Association of MHC class I and class II gene polymorphisms with vaccine or challenge response to Salmonella Enteritidis in young chicks. Immunoqenetics 54(8), 582-590 (2002).
38. Mariani P, Barrow PA, Cheng HH et al. Localization to chicken chromosome 5 of a novel focus determining salmonellosis resistance. Immunogenetics 53 (9). 786-791 (2001).
39. Loeksley RM, Heinzel FP, Sadick MD, Holaday BJ, Gardner KD Jr. Murine cutaneous leishmaniasis: susceptibility correlates with differential expansion of helper T-cell subsets. Ann. Inst. Pasteur Immunol. 138(5), 744-749 (1987).
40. Rose ME, Wakelin D, Hesketh P. Eimeria vermiformis. differences in the course of primary infection can be correlated with lymphocyte responsiveness in the BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse, Mus Musculus. Exp. Parasitol. 71(3), 276-283 (1990).
41. Tagliabue A, Nencioni L, Villa L, Boraschi D. Genetic control of in vitro natural cell-mediated activity against Salmonella Typhimurium by intestinal and splenic lymphoid cells in mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 56(3), 531-536 (1984).
42. de Gee AL, Sonenfeld G, Mansfield JM. Genetics of resistance to the African trypanosomes. V. Qualitative and quantitative differences in interferon production among susceptible and resistant mouse strains. J. Immunol. 134(4), 2723-2726 (1985).
43. Bumstead JM, Bumstead N, Rothwell L, Tomley FM. Comparison of immune responses in inbred lines of chickens to Eimeria maxima and Eimeria tenella. Parasitology 111 (Pt 2), 143-151 (1995).
44. Jarosinski KW, Yunis R, O'Connell PH, Markowski-Grimsrud CJ, Schat KA. Influence of genetic resistance of the chicken and virulence of Marek's disease virus (MDV) on nitric oxide responses after MDV infection. Avian Dis. 46(3), 636-649 (2002).
45. Sharma JM. Natural killer cell activity in chickens exposed to Marek's disease virus: inhibition of activity in susceptible chickens and enhancement of activity in resistant and vaccinated chickens. Avian Dis. 25(4), 882-893 (1981).
46. Kaiser MG, Wing T, Lamont SJ. Effect of genetics, vaccine dosage, and postvaccination sampling interval on early antibody response to Salmonella enteritidis vaccine in broiler breeder chicks. Poult. Sci. 77(2), 271-275 (1998).
47. Kramer J, Malek M, Lamont SJ. Association of twelve candidate gene polymorphisms; and response to challenge with Salmonella Enteritidis in poultry. Anim. Genet. 34(5), 339-348 (2003).
48. Sadeyen JR, Trotereau J, Velge P et al. Salmonalla carrier state in chicken: comparison of expression of immune. response genes between susceptible, and resistant animals. Microbes Infect. 6 (14), 1278-1286 (2004).
49. Sadeyen JR, Trotereau J, Protais J et al. Salmonella carrier-state in hens: study of host resistance by a gene expression approach. Microbes Infect. 8(5), 1308-1314 (2006).
50. Ratcliffe MJH. Development of the avian B cell lymphocyte lineage. CRC Crit. Rev. Poultry Biol. 2, 207-234 (1989).
51. Houssaint E, Belo M, Le Douarin NM. Investigations on cell lineage and tissue interactions in the developing bursa of Fabricius through interspecific chimeras. Dev Biol., 53(2), 250-264 (1976).
52. Cooper MD, Cain WA, Van Alten PJ, Good RA. Development and function of the immunoglobulin producing system. I. Effect of bursectomy at different stages of development on germinal centers, plasma cells, immunoglobulins and antibody production. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 35(31) 242-252 (1969).
53. Glick B, Olah I. Methods of bursectomy. Meth. Enzymol. 108, 3-10 (1984).
54. Mast J. Desmidt M, Room G et al. Different methods of bursectomy induce different effects on leukocyte distribution and reactivity. [Arch. Geflugelk 61, 238-246 (1997).
55. Ratcliffe JH. The study of B cell differentiation. In: Immunology Methds Manual. Lefkowits I (Ed.). Academic Press Ltd., London, UK (1997).
56. Kim Y, Brown TP, Pantin-Jackwood MJ. Lesions induced in broiler chickens by cyclophosphamide treatment. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 45(3), 121-123 (2003).
57. Ficken MD, Barnes HJ. Effect of cyclophosphamide on selected hematologic parameters of the turkey. Avian Dis. 32(4), 812-817 (1988).
58. Linna TJ, Frommel D, Good RA. Effects of early cyclophosphamide treatment on & development of lymphoid organs and immunological functions in the chicken. Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 42(1), 20-39 (1972).
59. Marsh J, Glick B. The effect of cyclophosphamide on bursal and splenic dendritic cells. Poult. Sci. 71 (1), 111-119 (1992).
60. Arnold JW, Holt PS. Response to Salmonella Enteritidis infection by the immunocompromised avian host. Poult. Sci. 74(4), 656-6655 (1995).
61. Corrier DE, Elissalde MH, Ziprin RL, DeLoach JR. Effect of immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide, cyclosporin, or dexamethasone on Salmenella colonization of broiler chicks. Avian Dis. 35 (1), 40-45 (1991).
62. Russell PH, Dwivedi PN, Davison TF. The effects of cyclosporin A and cyclophosphamide on the populations of B and T cells and virus in the Harderian gland of chickens vaccinated with the Hitchner B1 strain of Newcastle disease virus. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 60(1-2), 171-185 (1997).
63. Sharma JM, Lee LF. Suppressive effect of cyclophosphamide on the T-cell system in chickens. Infect. Immun. 17(l), 227-230 (1977).
64. Lillehoj HS. Effects of immunosuppression on avian coccidiosis: cyclosporin A but not, hormonal bursectomy abrogates host protective immunity. Infect. Immun. 55(7), 1616-1621 (1987).
65. Rose ME, Hesketh P. Immunity to coccidiosis: T-lymphocyte- or B-lymphocyte-deficient animals. Infect. Immun. 26(2), 630-637 (1979).
66. Hatkin J, Giambrone JJ, Blagburn BL. Correlation of circulating antibody and cellular immunity with resistance against Cryptosporidium baileyl in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 37(3), 800-804 (1993).
67. Hu LB, Lucio B, Schat KA. Abrogation of age-related resistance to chicken infectious anemia by embryonal bursectomy. Avian Dis. 37(l), 157-169 (1993).
68. Cook JK, Davison TF, Huggins MB, McLaughlan P. Effect of in ovo bursectomy on the course of an infectious bronchitis virus infection in line C White Leghorn chickens. Arch. Virol. 118(3-4), 225-234 (1991).
69. Beal RK, Powers C, Davison TF, Barrow PA, Smith AL. Clearance of enteric Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in chickens is independent of B-cell function. Infect. Immun. 74(2), 1442-1444 (2006).
70. Brownwell JR, Sadler WW, Fanelli MJ. Role of bursa of Fabricius in chicken resistance to Salmonella Typhimurium. Avian Dis. 14, 142-152 (1970).
71. Desmidt M, Ducatelle R, Mast J et al. Role of the humoral immune system in Salmonella enteritidis phage type four infection in chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 63(4), 355-367 (1998).
72. Ziprin RL, Elissalde MH. Effect of T-2 toxin on resistance to systemic Salmonella typhimurium infection of newly hatched chickens. Am. J. Vet. Res. 51 (11), 1869-1872 (1990).
73. Hemmingsson EJ, Linna. TJ. Ontogenetic studies on lymphoid cell traffic in the chicken. I. Cell migration from the bursa of Fabricius. Int Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 42(5), 693-710 (1972).
74. Paramithiotis E, Ratcliffe MJ. Bursa-dependent subpopulations of peripheral B lymphocytes in chicken blood. Eur. J. Immunol. 23(1), 96-102 (1993).
75. Mastroeni P. Villarreal-Ramos B, Hormaeche CE. Adoptive transfer of immunity to oral challenge with virulent salmonellae in innately susceptible BALB/c mice requires both immune serum and T cells. Infect. Immun. 61(9), 3981-3984 (1993).
76. al-Ramadi BK, Fernandez-Cabezudo MJ, Ullah A, El-Hasasna H, Flavell RA. CD154 is essential for protective immunity in experimental Salmonella infection: evidence for a dual role in innate and adaptive immune responses. J. Immunol. 176(1), 496-506 (2006).
77. Mittrucker HW, Raupach B, Kohler A, Kaufmann SH. Cutting edge: role of B lymphocytes in protective immunity against Salmonella typhimurium infection. J. Immunol. 164(4), 1648-1652 (2000).
78. Uppington H, Menager N, Boross P et al. Effect of immune serum and role of individual Fc γ receptors on the intracellular distribution and survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in murine macrophages. Immunology 119 (2), 147-158 (2006).
79. -/- (B-cell-deficient) mice fail to mount solid acquired resistance to oral challenge with virulent Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and show impaired Th1 T cell responses to Salmonella antigens. Infect. Immun. 68(l), 46-53 (2000).
80. Eisenstein TK, Killar LM, Sultzer BM. Immunity to infection with Salmonella typhimurium: mouse-strain differences in vaccine- and serum-mediated protection. J. Infect. Dis. 150(3), 425-435 (1984).
81. McSorley SJ, Jenkins MK. Antibody is required for protection against virulent but not attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 68 (6), 3344-3348(2000).
82. Killion JW, Morrison DC. Determinants of immunity to murine salmonellosis: studies involving immunization with lipopolysaccharide-lipid A-associated protein complexes in C3H/HeJ mice. FEMS Microbiol. Immunol. 1(1), 41-53 (1988).
83. Muthukkumar S, Muthukkaruppan VR. Mechanism of protective immunity induced by porin-lipopolysaccharide against murine salmonellosis. Infect. Immun. 61(7), 3017-3025 (1993).
84. -/-) mice with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium infection. Infect. Immun. 71(12), 6808-6819 (2003).
85. Kogut MH, Rothwell L, Kaiser P. Differential regulation of cytokine gene expression by avian heterophils; during receptor-mediated phagocytosis of opsonized and nonopsonized Salmonella enteritidis. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 23 (6), 319-327 (2003).
86. Kogut MH, Tellez G, Hargis BM, Corrier DE, DeLoach JR. The effect of 5-fluorouracil treatment of chicks: a cell depletion model for the study of avian polymorphonuclear leukocytes and natural host defenses. Poult. Sci. 72(10), 1873-1880 (1993).
87. Wigley P, Hulme SD, Powers C et al. Infection of the reproductive tract and eggs with Salmonella enterica serovar Pullorum in the chicken is associated with suppression of cellular immunity at sexual maturity. Infect. Immun. 73(5), 2986-2990 (2005).
88. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium, Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432(7018), 695-716 (2004).
89. Lillico SG, Sherman A, McGrew MJ et al. Oviduct-specific expression of two therapeutic proteins in transgenic hens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(6), 1771-1776 (2007).
90. van de Lavoir MC, Diamond JH, Leighton PA et al. Germline transmission of genetically modified primordial germ cells. Nature 441(7094), 766-769 (2006).