Pseudo-precision in gene expression values can reduce efficiency

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 538-541

  Neuhäuser, Markus ^a,b   Boes, T ^a   Jockel K H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^b Fachbereich Mathematik und Technik   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Low level analysis; Microorray; Nonparametric test; Precision; Ties

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; GENE EXPRESSION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 35349003675     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1160/ME0397     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Repsilber D, Mansmann U, Brunner E, Ziegler A. Tutorial on microarray gene expression experiments. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 392-9.
2. Wit E, McClure J. Statistics for microarray: design, analysis, and inference. Chichester: Wiley; 2004.
3. Boes T, Neuhäuser M. Normalization for Affymetrix GeneChips. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 414-7.
4. Ittrich C. Normalization for two-channel microarray data. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 418-22.
5. Dugas M, et al. A generic concept for large-scale microarray analysis dedicated to medical diagnostics. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45: 146-52.
6. Suárez-Fariñas M, Haider A, Wittkowski KM. "Harshlighting" small blemishes on microarrays. BMC Bioinformatics 2005; 6: 65.
7. Repsilber D, et al. Sample selection for microarray gene expression studies. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 461-7.
8. Rahnenführer J. Image analysis for cDNA microarrays. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44: 405-7.
9. Draghici S, et al. Reliability and reproducibility issues in DNA microarray measurements. Trends in Genetics 2006; 22: 101-9.
10. Neuhäuser M, Senske R. The Baumgartner-Weiß-Schindler test for the detection of differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 3553-64.
11. Putter J. The treatment of ties in some nonparametric tests. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1955; 26: 368-86.
12. Lehmacher W. Asymptotische Eigenschaften linearer Zweistichproben- Rangtests bei beliebigen Verteilungen. PhD thesis, Department of Statistics, University of Dortmund; 1976.
13. Tilquin P, et al. Non-parametric interval mapping in half-sib designs: use of midranks to account for ties. Genetical Research 2003; 81: 221-8.
14. Gadbury GL, et al. Randomization tests for small samples: an application for genetic expression data. Applied Statistics 2003; 52: 365-76.
15. Hollander M, Wolfe DA. Nonparametric statistical methods. New York: Wiley (2nd edition); 1999.
16. Manly BFJ. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman & Hall (2nd edition); 1997.
17. Good PI. Permutation tests. New York: Springer (2nd edition); 2000.
18. Brunner E, Munzel U. Nichtparametrische Datenanalyse. Berlin: Springer; 2002.
19. Irizarry RA, et al. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Research 2003; 31: e15.
20. Irizarry RA, Hobbs FCB, Beaxer-Barclay Y, Antonellis K, Scherf U, Speed TP. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 2003; 4: 249-64.
21. Giles PJ, Kipling D. Normality of oligonucleotide microarray data and implications for parametric statistical analyses. Bioinformatics 2003; 19: 2254-62.
22. Tschentscher F, et al. Tumor classification based on gene expression profiling shows that uveal melanomas with and without monosomy 3 represent two distinct entities. Cancer Research 2003; 63: 2578-84.
23. Alam I, et al. Comparative homology agreement search: An effective combination of homology-search methods. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2004; 101: 13814-9.