The Baumgartner-Weiβ-Schindler test for the detection of differentially expressed genes in replicated microarrays experiments

Bioinformatics

Volumn 20, Issue 18, 2004, Pages 3553-3564

  Neuhäuser, Markus ^a   Senske, Roswitha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN; COMPLEMENTARY DNA; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RANK SUM TEST; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THYROID PAPILLARY CARCINOMA; ALGORITHM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; METHODOLOGY; SAMPLE SIZE; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

MARTES PENNANTI;

ALGORITHMS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 12344269956     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth442     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baumgartner,W., Weiß,P. and Schindler,H. (1998) A nonparametric test for the general two-sample problem. Biometrics, 54, 1129-1135.
2. Blair,R.C. and Higgins,J.J. (1980) A comparison of the power of Wilcoxon's rank-sum statistic to that of Student's t statistic under various non-normal distributions. J. Educational Statistics, 5 309-335.
3. Blair,R.C., Higgins,J.J. and Smitley,D.S. (1980) On the relative power of the U and t tests. British J Mathematical Statistical Psychol., 33, 114-120.
4. Brunner,E. and Munzel,U. (2002) Nichtparametrische Datenanalyse. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
5. Dudbridge,F. and Koeleman,B.P.C. (2003) Rank truncated product of P-values, with application to genomewide association scans. Genet. Epidemiol., 25, 360-366.
6. Cope,L.M., Irizarry,R.A., Jaffee,H.A., Wu,Z. and Speed,T.P. (2004) A benchmark for Affymetrix GeneChip expression measures. Bioinformatics, 20, 323-331.
7. Craig,B.A., Black,M.A. and Doerge,R.W. (2003) Gene expression data: the technology and statistical analysis. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat., 8, 1-28.
8. Gadbury,G.L., Page,G.P., Heo,M., Mountz,J.D. and Allison,D.B. (2003) Randomization tests for small samples: an application for genetic expression data. Appl. Stat., 52, 365-376.
9. Gibson,G. (2002) Microarrays in ecology and evolution: a preview. Mol. Ecol., 11, 17-24.
10. Giles,P.J. and Kipling.D. (2003) Normality of oligonucleotide microarray data and implications for parametric statistical analyses. Bioinformatics, 19, 2254-2262.
11. Good,P.I. (2000) Permutation Tests, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NY.
12. Hedenfalk,I., Duggan,D., Chen,Y., Radmacher,M., Bittner,M., Simon,R., Meltzer,P., Gusterson,B., Esteller,M., Kallioniemi,O.P. et al. (2001) Gene-expression profiles in hereditary breast cancer. New Engl. J. Med., 344, 539-548.
13. Huang,Y., Prasad,M., Lemon,W.J., Hampel,H., Wright,F.A., Kornacker,K., LiVolsi,V., Frankel,W., Kloos,R.T., Eng,C., Pellegata,N.S. and de la Chapelle,A. (2001) Gene expression in papillary throid carcinoma reveals highly consistent profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 15044-15049.
14. Hunter,L., Taylor,R.C., Leach,S.M. and Simon,R. (2001) GEST: a gene expression search tool based on a novel Bayesian similarity metric. Bioinformatics, 17 (Suppl. 1), S115-S122.
15. Hunter,M.A. and May,R.B. (1993) Some myths concerning parametric and nonparametric tests. Can. Psychol., 34, 384-389.
16. Irizarry,R.A., Bolstad,B.M., Collon,F., Cope,L.M., Hobbs,B. and Speed,T.P. (2003a) Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, e15.
17. Irizarry,R.A., Hobbs,F.C.B., Beaxer-Barclay,Y., Antonellis,K., Scherf,U. and Speed,T.P. (2003b) Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics, 4, 249-264.
18. Keller-McNulty,S. and Higgins,J.J. (1987) Effect of tail weight on power and type-I error of robust permutation tests for location. Commun. Stat. - Simulat. Comput., 16, 17-35.
19. Kennedy,P.E. (1995) Randomization tests in econometrics. J. Business Economic Statistics, 13, 85-94.
20. Liu,L., Hawkins,D.M., Ghosh,S. and Young,S.S. (2003) Robust singular value decomposition analysis of microarray data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 13167-13172.
21. Lönnstedt,I. and Speed,T. (2002) Replicated microarray data. Stat. Sin, 12, 31-46.
22. Magusin,A. (2003) Complementary techniques of clustering and composite pattern analysis to Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene expression. Appl Bioinformatics, 2 (3 Suppl), S37-S46.
23. Manly,B.F.J. (1997) Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall, London, U.K.
24. Neuhäuser,M. (2000) An exact two-sample test based on the Baumgartner-Weiβ-Schindler statistic and a modification of Lepage's test. Commun. Stat. - Theory Meth., 29, 67-78.
25. Neuhäuser,M. (2001) One-sided two-sample and trend tests based on a modified Baumgartner-Weiβ-Schindler statistic. J. Nonparametr Stat., 13, 729-739.
26. Neuhäuser,M. (2002) The Baumgartner-Weiβ-Schindler test in the presence of ties (letter to the editor). Biometrics, 58 250.
27. Neuhäuser,M. (2003) A note on the exact test based on the Baumgartner-Weiβ-Schindler statistic in the presence of ties. Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 42, 561-568.
28. Pan,W. (2002) A comparative review of statistical methods for discovering differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 18, 546-554.
29. Pavlidis,P., Li,Q. and Noble,W.S. (2003) The effect of replication on gene expression microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 19, 1620-1627.
30. Pitman,E.J.G. (1937) Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any populations. Suppl. J Royal Stat. Soc., 4 119-130.
31. Rasmussen,J.L. (1986) An evaluation of parametric and non-parametric tests on modified and non-modified data. Brit. J. Mathemat. Stat. Psychol., 39, 213-220.
32. Storey,J.D. and Tibshirani,R. (2003) Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad Sci. USA, 100, 9440-9445.
33. Tanizaki,H. (1997) Power comparison of non-parametric tests: small-sample properties from Monte Carlo experiments. J. Appl. Stat. 24, 603-632.
34. Thomas,J.G., Olson,J.M., Tapscott,S.J. and Zhao,L.P. (2001) An efficient and robust statistical modeling approach to discover differentially expressed genes using genomic expression profiles. Genome Res., 11, 1227-1236.
35. Troyanskaya,O.G., Garber,M.E., Brown,P.O., Botstein,D. and Altman,R.B. (2002) Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data. Bioinformatics, 18, 1454-1461.
36. Tschentscher,F., Hüsing,J., Hölter,T., Kruse,E., Dresen,I.G., Jöckel,K.-H., Anastassiou,G., Schilling,H., Bornfeld,N., Horsthemke,B., Lohmann,D.R. and Zeschnigk,M. (2003) Tumor classification based on gene expression profiling shows that uveal melanomas with and without monosomy 3 represent two distinct entities. Cancer Res., 63, 2578-2584.
37. van den Brink,W.P. and van den Brink,S.G.J. (1989) A comparison of the power of the t test, Wilcoxon's test, and the approximate permutation test for the two-sample location problem. Brit. J. Mathemat. Stat. Psychol., 42, 183-189.
38. Wu,T.D. (2001) Analysing gene expression data from DNA microarrays to identify candidate genes. J. Pathol., 195, 53-65.
39. Xu,R. and Li,X. (2003) A comparison of parametric versus permutation methods with applications to general and temporal microarray gene expression data. Bioinformatics, 19, 1284-1289.
40. Zaykin,D.V., Zhivotovsky,L.A., Westfall,P.H. and Weir,B.S. (2002) Truncated product method for combining P-values. Genet. Epidemiol., 22, 170-185.
41. Zhao,Y. and Pan,W. (2003) Modified nonparametric approaches to detecting differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 19, 1046-1054.
42. Zimmerman,D.W. and Zumbo,B.D. (1993) The relative power of parametric and nonparametric statistical methods. In Keren,G. and Lewis,C. (eds), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: methodological issues. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 481-517.