Comparative study of six blood gas analysers;Étude comparative de six analyseurs de gaz du sang

Annales de Biologie Clinique

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 505-518

  Daures M F ^a   Combescure, C ^b   Cristol, J P ^c  

^a HÔPITAL SAINT ELOI   (France)

^b DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY   (France)

^c LAPEYRONIE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

Blood gas analysers; Evaluation; Point of care testing; Statistical tests

Indexed keywords

BICARBONATE; CALCIUM; CARBON DIOXIDE; ELECTROLYTE; HEMOGLOBIN; OXYGEN; POTASSIUM; SODIUM;

ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PH; PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

BICARBONATES; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; CALCIUM; CARBON DIOXIDE; ELECTROLYTES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEMATOCRIT; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MATERIALS TESTING; OXYGEN; PARTIAL PRESSURE; POTASSIUM; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SODIUM;

EID: 35348994392     PISSN: 00033898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1684/abc.2007.0150     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Daurès MF, Sol H. Délocalisation des gaz du sang. L'expérience du CHU de Montpellier. Spectra Biologie 2006 ; 153 : 36-46.
2. Capolaghi B, Vassault A, Grafmeyer D, Yvert JP. Le protocole Valtec. Évolution du concept et du contenu. Compte rendu de l'assemblée générale de la Société française de biologie clinique. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 1997 ; 55 : 167-73.
3. Magny E, Renard MF, Launay JM. Évaluation de l'analyseur de gazométrie sanguine Rapidpoint 400. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2001 ; 59 : 622-7.
4. Beneteau-Burnat B, Bocque MC, Lorin A, Martin C, Vaubourdolle M. Evaluation of the blood gas analyser GEM PREMIER 3000. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004 ; 42 : 96-101.
5. Feuillu A, Morel I, Mollard JF. Évaluation d'un analyseur portable i-STAT. Bilan de 7 000 analyses. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2002 ; 60 : 153-64.
6. NCCLS. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples. Approved guidline. Wayne : NCCLS, 1995.
7. Coudene P, Marson B, Badiou S, et al. Evaluation of the ABX Pentra 400, a newly available clinical chemistry analyser. Clin Chem Lab Med 2005 ; 43 : 782-92.
8. Couck P, Ghys T, Gastel EV, Coillie MV, Gorus F, Gerlo E. Preliminary performance of blood gas analysers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006 ; 44 : 1030-4.
9. Dascombe BJ, Reaburn PR, Sirotic AC, Coutts AJ. The reliability of the i-STAT clinical portable analyser. J Sci Med Sport 2006 ; [Epub ahead of print].
10. Shorout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations : uses in assessing rater relialility. Psychol Bull 1979 ; 86 : 420-8.
11. Lin LIK. A concordance correlation. Coefficient to evaluate reproductibility. Biometrics 1989 ; 45 : 255-68.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977 ; 33 : 159-74.
13. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York : John Wiley and sons, 1981 : 218.
14. Bland M, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 ; 8 : 307-10.
15. Combescure C. Méta analyses de technique diagnostic et gold standard imparfait, Thèse de doctorat, Université de Montpellier I, 2003.
16. Alonzo TA, Pepe MS. Using a combination of reference tests to assess the accuracy of a new diagnostic test. Stat Med 1999 ; 18 : 2987-3003.
17. Hui SL, Zhou XM. Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards. Stat Methods Med Res 1998 ; 7 : 354-70.
18. Bertrand P, Benichou J, Chastang C. Estimation par la méthode de Hui et Walter de la sensibilité et de la spécificité d'un test diagnostique en l'absence d'un test de référence : résultats d'une étude de simulation. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 1994 ; 42 : 502-11.
19. Dawid RP, Skene AM. Maximum likelihood estimation of observer error-rates using the EM algorithm. Appl Stat 1979 ; 28 : 20-8.
20. Steinfelder-Visscher J, Weerwind PW, Teerenstra S, Brouwer MH. Reliability of point-of-care hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardio-pulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2006 ; 21 : 33-7.
21. Walton HG, Boucher DM, Marroquin R. Comparison of blood gas and electrolyte test results from the GEM Premier and ABL 70 versus a conventional laboratory analyser. J Extra Corpor Technol 2003 ; 35 : 24-7.
22. Papadea C, Foster J, Grant S, Ballard SA, Cate JC. Evaluation of the I-STAT portable clinical analyser for point-of-care blood testing in the intensive care units of a university children's hospital. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2002 ; 32 : 231-43.
23. Stott RA, Hortin GL, Wilhite TR, Miller SB, Smith CH, Landt M. Analytical artifacts in hematocrit measurements by whole blood chemistry analyzers. Clin Chem 1995 ; 41 : 306-11.
24. Prichard JS, French JS. Alvar N. Clinical evaluation of the ABL-77 for point-of-care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room. J Extra Corpor Technol 2006 ; 38 : 128-33.
25. Hopfer SM, Nadeau FL, Sundra M, Makowski GS. Effect of protein on hematocrit assays with a conductivity-based point-of-care testing device : comparison with optical methods. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2004 ; 34 : 75-82.
26. Mc Mahon DJ, Carpenter RL. A comparison of conductivity-based hematocrit determinations with conventional laboratory methods in autologous blood transfusions. Anesth Analg 1990 ; 71 : 541-4.
27. Schifman RB, Rivers SL, Delduca M. Predonation hematocrit mesurement by whole blood electrical conductivity assay. Transfusion 1985 ; 25 : 251-3.
28. Gouget B, Laforge M, Feuillu A. Caractéristiques des appareils de pH, gaz du sang et paramètres d'urgence. Spectra Biologie 1998 ; 93 : 38-43 et 98 : 39-45.
29. Gouget B, Laforge M, Feuillu A. Les systèmes de gestion à distance des analyseurs de pH, gaz du sang et electrolytes. Spectra Biologie 2002 ; 122 : 28-36.
30. Gouget B, Laforge M, Feuillu A. Analyseurs de pH, gaz du sang et cooxymétrie. Spectra Biologie 2002 ; 124 : 28-45.