Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Japanese Journal of Urology

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 737-742

  Yamaguchi, Kohei ^a   Tanaka, Kazushi ^a   Nakano, Yuzo ^a   Takeda, Masashi ^a   Yamada, Yuji ^a   Hara, Isao ^a   Kawabata, Gaku ^b   Fujisawa, Masato ^a  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b KANSAI ROSAI HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HORSESHOE KIDNEY; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PYELONEPHRITIS; PYELOPLASTY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; UROGENITAL TRACT RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 33746888305     PISSN: 00215287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5980/jpnjurol1989.97.737     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brooks JD, Kavoussi LR, Preminger GM: Comparison of open and endourologic approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction. Urology, 46, 791, 1995.
2. Arun N, Kekre NS, Nath V, Gopalakrishnan G: Is open pyeloplasty still justified? BJU, 80, 379-81, 1997.
3. Nadler BR, Rao GS, Pearle MS: Acucise endopyelotomy: Assessment of long-term durability. J Urol, 156, 1094, 1996.
4. Motola JA, Badlani GH, Smith AD: Results of 212 consecutive endopyelotomies: An 8-year follow-up. J Urol, 149, 453, 1996.
5. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol, 150, 1795-9, 1993.
6. Takeshi I, Koon HR, Albert MO, Louis RK, Thomas WJ: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Current status. Br J Urol, 95, 102-5, 2005.
7. Abdullatif H, Paul W, Kevin P, Anil K: McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty. The Canadian J Urol, 11, 2299-2302, 2004.
8. Ingolf AT, John WD, Björn W, Serdar D, Frank R, Michael DF, Bernd S, Gerald HJ, Stefan AL: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: The method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol, 42, 268-75, 2002.
9. Anderson JC, Hynes W: Retrocaval ureter: A case diagnosed preoperatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol, 21, 209-14, 1949.
10. Hellstrom J, Giertz G, Lindblom K: Pathogenesis and treatment of hydronephrosis, in VIII Congreso de la Sociedad International de Urologia, Paris, 1949.
11. Fenger C: Operation for relief of valve formation and stricture of the ureter in hydro or pyonephrosis. JAMA, 22, 335-47, 1894.
12. Gunter J, Reinhard P, Silvio A: Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology, 47, 311-316, 1996.
13. Moore RG, Averch TD, Schulam PG, Adams JB, Chen RN, Kavoussi LR: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Experience with the initial 30 cases. J Urol. 157, 459-62, 1997.
14. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Bartsch G: Laparoscopic Fenger plasty. J Endourol, 14, 889-93, 2000.
15. Maxwell VM, Marshall LS: Hellstom technique revisited: Laparoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology, 62, 404-9, 2003.
16. Chandru PS, Robert LG III, Jamil R, Van Y, Cathy C, Jaime L, Elspeth MM, Ralph VC: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol, 169, 2037-40, 2003.
17. Wyler SF, Bachmann A, Casella R, Gasser T, Sulser T: Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Endourol. 18, 948-51, 2004.
18. Eden CG, Cahill D, Allen JD: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases. BJU Int, 526, 88, 2001.