Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: A randomized trial of outcomes at five years

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 89, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2204-2211

  Beaupre L A ^a   Al Yamani, M ^a   Huckell, J R ^a   Johnston, D W C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; HYDROXYAPATITE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; JOINT FUNCTION; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; MEDICAL RECORD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RAND 36 ITEM HEALTH SURVEY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF REPORT; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

EID: 35348960866     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01431     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1745-52.
2. Lidgren L, Knutson K, Robertsson O. Annual Report 2005 - The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. http://www.knee.nko.se/english/online/uploadedFiles/ 104_SKAR%202005_engl.pdf.
3. 2005 CJJR Report: Total hip and total knee replacement in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Instititute for Health Information; 2006. http://secure.cihi.ca/ cihiweb/dispPage.jsp?cw_page=PG_386_E&cw_topic=386&cw_rel=AR_30_E
4. Jena D, Ng A, Courtman N, Smith RB. Current attitudes towards cementing in TKR: a national survey amongst members of the BASK. Knee. 2005;12:183.
5. Bozic KJ, Kinder J, Meneghini RM, Zurakowski D, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Implant survivorship and complication rates after total knee arthroplasty with a third-generation cemented system: 5 to 8 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:117-24. Erratum in: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;435:277.
6. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;345:79-86.
7. Abu-Rajab RB, Watson WS, Walker B, Roberts J, Gallacher SJ, Meek RM. Periprosthetic bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty. Cemented versus cementless fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:606-13.
8. Bassett RW. Results of 1,000 Performance knees: cementless versus cemented fixation. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:409-13.
9. Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:66-72.
10. Nelissen RG, Valstar ER, Rozing PM. The effect of hydroxyapatite on the micromotion of total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1665-72.
11. Regner L, Carlsson L, Karrholm J, Herberts P. Ceramic coating improves tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:882-9.
12. Akizuki S, Takizawa T, Horiuchi H. Fixation of a hydroxyapatite- tricalcium phosphate-coated cementless knee prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic evaluation seven years after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:1123-7.
13. Carlsson A, Bjorkman A, Besjakov J, Onsten I. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:362-9.
14. Cross MJ, Parish EN. A hydroxyapatite-coated total knee replacement: prospective analysis of 1000 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1073-6.
15. Murty AN, Scott G, Freeman MA. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral components in total knee arthroplasty: medium term results. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:844-51.
16. Nilsson KG, Karrholm J, Carlsson L, Dalen T. Hydroxyapatite coating versus cemented fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: prospective randomized comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components with 5-year follow-up using radiostereometry. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:9-20.
17. Oliver MC, Keast-Butler OD, Hinves BL, Shepperd JA. A hydroxyapatite-coated Insall-Burstein II total knee replacement: 11-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:478-82.
18. Petersen MM, Gehrchen PM, Ostgaard SE, Nielsen PK, Lund B. Effect of hydroxyapatite-coated tibial components on changes in bone mineral density of the proximal tibia after uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:516-20.
19. Regner L, Carlsson L, Karrholm J, Herberts P. Tibial component fixation in porous- and hydroxyapatite-coated total knee arthroplasty: a radiostereo metric evaluation of migration and inducible displacement after 5 years. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:681-9.
20. Dumbleton J, Manley MT. Hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:2526-40.
21. Shepperd JA, Apthorp H. A contemporary snapshot of the use of hydroxyapatite coating in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1046-9.
22. Mouzin O, Soballe K, Bechtold JE. Loading improves anchorage of hydroxyapatite implants more than titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:61-8.
23. Overgaard S, Lind M, Glerup H, Bunger C, Soballe K. Porous-coated versus grit-blasted surface texture of hydroxyapatite-coated implants during controlled micromotion: mechanical and histomorphometric results. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:449-58.
24. Rahbek O, Kold S, Bendix K, Overgaard S, Soballe K. Superior sealing effect of hydroxyapatite in porous-coated implants: experimental studies on the migration of polyethylene particles around stable and unstable implants in dogs. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:375-85.
25. Capello WN, D'Antonio JA, Feinberg JR, Manley MT. Ten-year results with hydroxyapatite-coated total hip femoral components in patients less than fifty years old. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:885-9.
26. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT, Geesink R. Hydroxyapatite femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty: 10- to 13-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:101-11.
27. Geesink RG, Hoefnagels NH. Six-year results of hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:534-47.
28. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bolognese JA, Seidenberg BC, Bellamy N. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:2635-41.
29. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthoplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988;1:95-108.
30. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright RJ, Wright EA, Sledge CB; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Validity and responsiveness of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1856-64.
31. McConnell S, Kolopack P, Davis AM. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:453-61.
32. Bombardier C, Melfi CA, Paul J, Green R, Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care. 1995;33(4 Suppl):AS131-44.
33. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2:217-27.
34. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-63.
35. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-83.
36. Hawker G, Melfi C, Paul J, Green R, Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol. 1995;22:1193-6.
37. Hayes V, Morris J, Wolfe C, Morgan M. The SF-36 health survey questionnaire: is it suitable for use with older adults? Age Ageing. 1995;24:120-5.
38. Gogia PP, Braatz JH, Rose SJ, Norton BJ. Reliability and validity of goniometric measurements at the knee. Phys Ther. 1987;67:192-5.
39. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;248:9-12.
40. Katz JN, Barrett J, Mahomed NN, Baron JA, Wright RJ, Losina E. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and the outcomes of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1909-16.