Field dependence-independence (FDI) cognitive style: An analysis of attentional functioning

Psicothema

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 572-577

  Guisande, M Adelina ^a   Páramo, M Fernanda ^a   Tinajero, Carolina ^a   Almeida, Leandro S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CHILD; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; RECEPTIVE FIELD;

ATTENTION; CHILD; COGNITION; FEMALE; FIELD DEPENDENCE-INDEPENDENCE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 35348955897     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Amador, J.A., & Kirchner, T. (1999). Correlations among scores on measures of field dependence-independence cognitive style, cognitive ability, and sustained attention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 236-239.
2. Avolio, B.J., Alexander, R.A., Barrett, G.V., & Sterns, H.L. (1981). Designing a measure of visual selective attention to assess individual differences in information processing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 29-42.
3. Baddeley, A., & Logie, R.H. (1999). Working memory. The multiple-component model. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.): Models of Working Memory. Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (pp. 28-61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
4. Bahar, M., & Hansel, M.H. (2000). The relationship between some psychological factors and their effect on the performance of grid questions and word association tests. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 349-364.
5. Baillargeon, R., Pascual-Leone, J., & Roncadin, C. (1998). Mental-attentional capacity: Does cognitive style make a difference? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70, 143-166.
6. Bennink, C.D. (1982). Individual differences in cognitive style, working memory, and semantic integration. Journal of Research In Personality, 16, 267-280.
7. Burton, J.K., Moore, D.M., & Holmes, GA. (1995). Hypermedia concepts and research: An overview. Computers in Human Behavior, 11, 345-369.
8. Cattell, R.B., & Cattell, A.K.S. (1986). Tests de Factor «g», Escalas 2y3 (4th ed.). Madrid: TEA (Original tests published 1973).
9. Clark, H.T., & Roof, K.D. (1988). Field dependence and strategy use. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 303-307.
10. Cochran, K.F., & Davis, J.K. (1987). Individual differences in inference processes. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 197-210.
11. Davis, J.K., & Cochran, K.F. (1990). An information processing view of field dependence-independence. In O.N. Saracho (Ed.): Cognitive Style and Early Education (pp. 61-78). New York, NY: Gordon and Breach Science.
12. Engle, R.W., & Kane, M.J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.): The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (vol. 44, pp. 145-199). New York, NY: Elsevier.
13. Fernández Ballesteros, R., Macia, A., Ruiz, J.M., Fernández Lagunilla, E., Del Villar, M.V., & Díaz Vega, P. (1980). Influencia de la dependenciaindependencia de campo sobre el efecto del « feedback» en una tarea de tiempos de reacción. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 35, 589-595.
14. Gathercole, S.E., & Pickering, S.J. (2000). Assessment of working memory in six-and seven-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 377-390.
15. Globerson, T. (1985). Field independence and mental capacity: A developmental approach. Developmental Review, 5, 261-273.
16. Goode, P.E., Goddard, PH., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2002). Event-related potentials index cognitive style differences during a serial-order recall task. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 43, 123-140.
17. Guisande, M.A., Tinajero, C., Rodríguez, M.S., Cadaveira, F., & Páramo, M.F. (2004), El estilo cognitivo dependencia-independencia de campo y el uso de estrategias globales versus analíticas. In F. Miras, N. Yuste & F. Valls (Eds.): IV Congreso Internacional de Psicología y Educación: Calidad Educativa (pp. 2255-2261). Almería: University of Almería.
18. Guisande, M.A., Tinajero, C., & Páramo, M.F. (2005 August). Are there any factors that may influence the course of cognitive development? Working memory and field dependence-Independence cognitive style. Poster session presented at the XIIth European Conference on Developmental Psychology. Tenerife.
19. Hale, J.B., Hoeppner, J.A.B., & Fiorello, CA. (2002). Analyzing digit span components for assessment of attention processes. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20(2), 128-143.
20. Hayes, J., & Allinson, C.W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, 51, 847-871.
21. Huteau, M. (1987). Style cognitif et personalitì, La dépendance-indépendance du champ. Lille: Presses Universitaires.
22. Hutton, U.M.Z., & Towse, J.N. (2001). Short-term memory and working memory as indices of children's cognitive skills. Memory, 9(4-6), 383-394.
23. Karp, S.A., & Konstadt, N.L. (1971). The Children's Embedded Figures Test (CEFT). In H.A. Witkin, P.K. Oltman, E. Raskin, & S.A. Karp (Eds.): A Manual for Embedded Figures Test (pp. 21-26). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.
24. Kirchner, T., Foras, M., & Amador, J.A. (1990). Relaciones entre las dimensiones de dependencia-independencia de campo, introversión- extroversion y tiempos de reacción. Anuario de Psicología, 46, 53-63.
25. Leo-Rhynie, E. (1985). Field independence, academic orientation and achievement. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 4, 22-27.
26. Lezak, S. (1995). Neuropsychological Assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Mansfield, E.A. (1997). Working memory development in adolescence: A neo-Piagetian investigation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley.
28. Marendaz, C (1985). Précédence globale et dépendance du champ: Des routines visuelles? Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 5, 727-745.
29. Macizo, P., Bajo, T., & Soriano, M.F. (2006). Memoria operativa y control ejecutivo: procesos inhibitorios en tarea de actualización y generación aleatoria. Psicothema, 18(1), 112-116.
30. Messick, S. (1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19, 59-74.
31. Miyaké, A., Witzki, A., & Emerson, M. (2001). Field dependence-independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the Hidden Figures Test. Memory, 9, 445-457.
32. Ohlmann, T., & Carbonnel, S. (1983). Dépendance- indépendance a l'égard du champ et activités classificatoires sur objets significatifs. In T. Ohlmann (Ed.): La Pensée Naturalle (pp. 275-285). Rouen: Presses Universitaires.
33. Páramo, M.F., Corral, M., Rodríguez, S., Tinajero, C., & Cadaveira, F. (1999, July). Cognitive functioning and field dependence-independence cognitive style. Poster session presented at the VI European Congress of Psychology, Rome.
34. Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-Piagetian theories: A dialectical causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531-570.
35. Pascual-Leone, J. (1997). Constructivismo dialéctico como fundamento epistemológico de la ciencia humana. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 31, 1-26.
36. Rickards, J.P., Fajen, B.R., Sullivan, J.F., & Gillespie, G. (1997). Signaling, notetaking and field dependence-independence in text comprehension and recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 508-517.
37. Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles: An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11, 193-215.
38. Robinson, J.A., & Bennink, C.D. (1978). Field articulation and working memory. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 443-449.
39. Roszkowski, MJ., & Snelbecker, G.E. (1987). Peripheral laterality, field independence, and academic achievement. A re-examination of their interrelationship. Developmental Neuropsychology, 3, 53-65.
40. Rozencwajg, P. (1991). Analysis of problem solving strategies on the Kohs Block Design Test. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 6, 73-88.
41. Saito, S. (2001). The phonological loop and memory for rhythms: An individual differences approach. Memory, 9(4-6), 313-322.
42. Tinajero, C., & Páramo, M.F. (1997). Field dependence-independence and academic achievement: A re-examination of their relationship. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 199-212.
43. Trenerry, M.R., Crosson, B., DeBoe, J., & Leber, W.R. (1990). Visual Search and Attention Test. Odessa, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
44. Tsakanikos, E. (2006). Associative learning and perceptual style: Are associated events perceived analytically or as a whole? Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 579-586.
45. a ed.). Madrid: TEA (Original scale published 1974).
46. Witkin, H.A., Oltman, P.K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S.A. (1971). A Manual for the Embedded Figures Tests. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
47. Zelazo, P.D., Müller, V., Frye, D., Marcovitch, S., Angitis, G., Boseovski, J., Chiang, J.K., Hongwanishkul, D., Schuster, B.V., & Sutherland, A. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3), VII-137.
48. Zelniker, T. (1989). Cognitive style and dimensions of information processing. In T. Globerson & T. Zelniker (Eds.): Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 172-191). Norwood: Ablex.
49. Zhang, L.F. (2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? - validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1295-1311.
50. nd ed.) (pp. 297-324). New York, NY: Guilford.