Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 77, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 766-772

  Yamada, Chiaki ^a   Kitai, Noriyuki ^b   Kakimoto, Naoya ^a   Murakami, Shumei ^a   Furukawa, Souhei ^a   Takada, Kenji ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b ASAHI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Alveolar bone; Computed tomography (CT); Mandibular prognathism; Mandibular symphysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 35348922869     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/072906-309     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Takada K, Petdachai S, Sakuda M. Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: a longitudinal cephalometric appraisal. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15:211-221.
2. Solow B. The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:145-161.
3. Worms FW, Isaacson RJ, Speidel TM. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning: profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod. 1976;46:1-25.
4. Rakosi T. Treatment of Class III malocclusions. In: Graber TM, Rakosi T, Petrovic A, eds. Dentofacial Orthopedics With Functional Appliances. St Louis, Mo: Mosby Year Book; 1997:391-411.
5. Brodie A. Analysis of changes during and subsequent to orthodontic management of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1938;8:330-351.
6. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod. 1996;66:95-109.
7. Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P. Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:239-246.
8. Wada K. A study on the individual growth of maxillofacial skeleton by means of lateral cephalometric roentgenograms. J Osaka Univ Dent Soc. 1977;22:239-269.
9. Davidian EJ. Use of a computer model to study the force distribution on the root of the maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod. 1971;59:581-588.
10. Christiansen RL, Burstone CJ. Centers of rotation within the periodontal space. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:353-369.
11. Downs WB. Variation in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod. 1948;34:812-840.
12. Aki T, Nanda RS, Currier GF, Nanda SK. Assessment of symphysis morphology as a predictor of the direction of mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:60-69.
13. Nojima K, Nakakawaji K, Sakamoto T, Isshiki Y. Relationships between mandibular symphysis morphology and lower incisor inclination in skeletal class III malocclusion requiring orthognathic surgery. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1998;39:175-181.
14. Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional interpretation of periodontal lesions and remodeling during orthodontic treatment. Part III. J Orofac Orthop. 1996;57:224-237.
15. Fuhrmann RA, Bucker A, Diedrich PR. Assessment of alveolar bone loss with high resolution computed tomography. J Periodontal Res. 1995;30:258-263.
16. Fuhrmann RA, Wehrbein H, Langen HJ, Diedrich PR. Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1995;24:50-54.
17. Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional interpretation of labiolingual bone width of the lower incisors. Part II. J Orofac Orthop. 1996;57:168-185.
18. Nauert K, Berg R. Evaluation of labio-lingual bony support of lower incisors in orthodontically untreated adults with the help of computed tomography. J Orofac Orthop. 1999;60:321-334.
19. Tsunori M, Mashita M, Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:557-562.
20. Masumoto T, Hayashi I, Kawamura A, Tanaka K, Kasai K. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:15-23.
21. Bjork A. Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by implant method. J Dent Res. 1963;42:400-411.