A critical assessment of the performance of protein-ligand scoring functions based on NMR chemical shift perturbations

Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 50, Issue 21, 2007, Pages 5128-5134

  Wang, Bing ^a   Westerhoff, Lance M ^b   Merz Jr , Kenneth M ^a  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b QUANTUMBIO INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; LIGAND BINDING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTEIN BINDING; SCORING SYSTEM;

BINDING SITES; LIGANDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 35348868045     PISSN: 00222623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jm070484a     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Brooijmans, N.; Kuntz, I. D. Molecular recognition and docking algorithms. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2003, 32, 335-73.
2. Alvarez, J. C. High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 8 (4), 365-70.
3. Kitchen, D. B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3 (11), 935-49.
4. Shoichet, B. K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 2004, 432 (7019), 862-5.
5. Mohan, V.; Gibbs, A. C.; Cummings, M. D.; Jaeger, E. P.; DesJarlais, R. L. Docking: successes and challenges. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11 (3), 323-33.
6. Hajduk, P. J.; Mack, J. C.; Olejniczak, E. T.; Park, C.; Dandliker, P. J.; Beutel, B. A. SOS-NMR: A saturation transfer NMR-based method for determining the structures of protein-ligand complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126 (8), 2390-2398.
7. Constantine, K. L.; Davis, M. E.; Metzler, W. J.; Mueller, L.; Claus, B. L. Protein-ligand NOE matching: a high-throughput method for binding pose evaluation that does not require protein NMR resonance assignments. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128 (22), 7252-63.
8. Mayer, M.; Meyer, B. Characterization of ligand binding by saturation transfer difference NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38 (12), 1784-1788.
9. Kollman, P., Free-Energy Calculations - Applications to Chemical and Biochemical Phenomena. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93 (7), 2395-2417.
10. Lamb, M. L.; Jorgensen, W. L. Computational approaches to molecular recognition. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1 (4), 449-57.
11. Gohlke, H.; Klebe, G. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41 (15), 2645-2676.
12. Simonson, T.; Archontis, G.; Karplus, M. Free energy simulations come of age: protein-ligand recognition. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35 (6), 430-7.
13. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19 (14), 1639-1662.
14. Ewing, T. J.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15 (5), 411-28.
15. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11 (5), 425-45.
16. Bohm, H. J. Prediction of binding constants of protein ligands: a fast method for the prioritization of hits obtained from de novo design or 3D database search programs. J Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12 (4), 309-23.
17. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16 (1), 11-26.
18. Muegge, I.; Martin, Y. C. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42 (5), 791-804.
19. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295 (2), 337-56.
20. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43 (25), 4759-67.
21. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44 (7), 1035-42.
22. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J. Med. Chem. 2003,46 (12), 2287-303.
23. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A. M.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvall, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senger, S.; Tedesco, G.; Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Peishoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (20), 5912-31.
24. Abagyan, R.; Totrov, M. High-throughput docking for lead generation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5 (4), 375-82.
25. Wang, B.; Brothers, E. N.; Van Der Vaart, A.; Merz, K. M. Fast semiempirical calculations for nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts: A divide-and-conquer approach. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 120 (24), 11392-400.
26. Wang, B.; Raha, K.; Merz, K. M. Pose Scoring by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11430-11431.
27. Sich, C.; Improta, S.; Cowley, D. J.; Guenet, C.; Merly, J. P.; Teufel, M.; Saudek, V. Solution structure of a neurotrophic ligand bound to FKBP12 and its effects on protein dynamics. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267(17), 5342-5354.
28. Zsoldos, Z.; Reid, D.; Simon, A.; Sadjad, B. S.; Johnson, A. P. eHiTS: an innovative approach to the docking and scoring function problems. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2006, 7 (5), 421-35.
29. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261 (3), 470-489.
30. McGann, M. R.; Almond, H. R.; Nicholls, A.; Grant, J. A.; Brown, F. K. Gaussian docking functions. Biopolymers 2003, 68 (1), 76-90.
31. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A.; Klicic, J. J.; Mainz, D. T.; Repasky, M. P.; Knoll, E. H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J. K.; Shaw, D. E.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. S. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (7), 1739-49.
32. Halgren, T. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Friesner, R. A.; Beard, H. S.; Frye, L. L.; Pollard, W. T.; Banks, J. L. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (7), 1750-9.
33. Diller, D. J.; Merz, K. M., Jr., High throughput docking for library design and library prioritization. Proteins 2001, 43 (2), 113-24.
34. Diller, D. J.; Li, R., Kinases, homology models, and high throughput docking. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46 (22), 4638-47.
35. Chemical Computing Group, C. C. MOE 2006.08, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2R7, 2006.
36. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26 (16), 1668-88.
37. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Gould, I. R.; Merz, K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. a., A 2nd Generation Force-Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic-Acids, and Organic-Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117 (19), 5179-5197.
38. Wang, B.; Raha, K.; Liao, N.; Peters, M. B.; Kim, H.; Westerhoff, L. M.; Wollacott, A. M.; van de Vaart, A.; Gogonea, V.; Suarez, D.; Dixon, S. L.; Vincent, J. J.; Brothers, E. N.; Merz, K. M. DivCon, 2005.