Bubbling menus: A selective mechanism for accessing hierarchical drop-down menus

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1195-1204

  Tsandilas, Theophanis ^a   Schraefel, M C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive able user interfaces; Cascading menus; Customization; Mouse gestures

Indexed keywords

CASCADING MENUS; CUSTOMIZATION; MOUSE GESTURES;

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; USER INTERFACES;

GESTURE RECOGNITION;

EID: 35348855116     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1240624.1240806     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Accot, J. and S. Zhai (1997). Beyond fitts' law: Models for trajectory-based HCl tasks. ACM CHI. 295-302.
2. Ahlstrom, D. (2005). Modeling and improving selection in cascading pull-down menus using fitts' law, the steering law and force fields. ACM CHI. 61-70.
3. Baudisch, P., E. Cutrell, D. Robbins, M. Czerwinski, P. Tandler, B. Bederson, and A. Zierlinger (2003). Drag-and-pop and drag-and-pick: Techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch- and pen-operated systems. INTERACT. 57-64.
4. Blanch, R., Y. Guiard, and M. Beaudouin-Lafon (2004). Semantic pointing: Improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation. ACM CHI. 519-525.
5. Cockbum, A. and A. Firth (2003). Improving the acquisition of small targets. British HCI Confer. 181-196.
6. Cockbum, A. and A. Gin (2006). Faster cascading menu selections with enlarged activation areas. Graphics Interface. 65-71.
7. Findlater, L. and J. McGrenere (2004). A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. ACM CHI. 89-96.
8. Fitts, P.M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47(6): 381-391.
9. Gajos, K.Z., M. Czerwinski, D.S. Tan, and D.S. Weld (2006). Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces. ACMA VI. 201-208.
10. Grossman, T. and R. Balakrishnan (2005). The bubble cursor: Enhancing target acquisition by dynamic resizing of the cursor's activation area. ACM CHI. 281-290.
11. Kobayashi, M. and T. Igarashi (2003). Considering the direction of cursor movement for efficient traversal of cascading menus. ACM UIST. 91-94.
12. Kurtenbach, G. and W. Buxton (1993). The limits of expert performance using hierarchic marking menus. Proceedings of InterCHI '93.482-487.
13. Landauer, T.K. and D.W. Nachbar (1985). Selection from alphabetic and numeric menu trees using a touch screen: Breadth, depth, and width. ACM CHI. 73-78.
14. Lane, D.M., A.H. Napier, C.S. Peres, and A. Sandor (2005). The hidden costs of graphical user interfaces: The failure to make the transition from menus and icon tool bars to keyboard shortcuts. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 18(2): 133-144.
15. Lee, J.D. and K.A. See (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46 (1): 50-80.
16. Luce, R.D. (1986). Response times and their role in inferring elementary mental organization: Oxford University Press.
17. McGrenere, J. and G. Moore (2000). Are we all in the same "Bloat"? Graphics Interface. 187-196.
18. McGrenere, J., R.M. Baecker, and K.S. Booth (2002). An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. ACM CHI. 163-170.
19. McGuffin, M. and R. Balakrishnan (2002). Acquisition of expanding targets. ACM CHI. 57-64.
20. Norman, K.L. (1991). The psychology of menu selection: Designing cognitive control at the human/computer interface: Alex Publishing Corporation.
21. Sears, A. and B. Shneiderman (1994). Split menus: Effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1): 27-51.
22. Tsandilas, T. and m.c. schraefel (2005). An empirical assessment of adaptation techniques. ACM CHI, Extended Abstracts. 2009-2012.
23. Zhai, S., S. Conversy, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, and Y. Guiard (2003). Human on-line response to target expansion. ACM CHI. 177-184.