Learning drifting negotiations

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 861-881

  Enembreck, Fabrício ^a   Ávila, Bráulio Coelho ^a   Scalabrin, Edson E ^a   Barthès, Jean Paul ^b  

^a PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ADAPTIVE TRADING AGENTS; DRIFT DETECTION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 35148863617     PISSN: 08839514     EISSN: 10876545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08839510701526954     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aha, D. W., D. Kibler, and M. K. Albert, 1991. Instance-based learning algorithms. Machine Learning 6(1):37-66.
2. Buffet, S. and B. Spencer. 2005. Learning opponents' preference in multi-object automated negotiation. In: Proc. of International Conference on Electronic Commerce '05, pages 300-305. Xi'an, China.
3. Coehoorn, R. M., and N. R. Jennings. 2004. Learning an opponent's preferences to make effective multi-issue negotiation trade-offs. In Proc. of the Sixth International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 59-68.
4. Faratin, T., C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. 1998. Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 23 (3-4):159-182.
5. Faratin, T., C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings, 2002. Using similarity criteria to make issue tradeoffs in auto mated negotiations. Artificial Intelligence 142(2):205-237.
6. Fatima, S., M. Wooldridge, and N. Jennings. 2004. An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artifcial Intelligence 152(1):45.
7. Gama, J., P. Medas, G. Castillo, and P. Rodrigues. 2004. Learning with drift detection. In Proc. of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Artificial Intelligence (SBIA'04) LNAI 3171, pages 286-295. Springer.
8. Gerding E. and D. Bragt. 2003. Multi-issue negotiation processes by evolutionary simulation, validation and social extensions. Computation Economics 2(1): 39-63.
9. Helmbold, D. P. and P. M. Long. 1994. Tracking drifting concepts by minimizing disagreements. Machine Learning 14(1):27-46.
10. Huang, S. and F. Lin. 2005. Designing intelligent sales-agent for online selling. In Proc. of the. International Conferen.ee on Eletronic Commerce, pages 279-286. Xi'an, China.
11. Klinkenberg, R. and I. Renz. 1998. Adaptive information filtering: Learning in the presence of concept drifts. AAAI-98/ICML-98, Vol. 1, pp. 33-40.
12. Kolter, J. Z., and M. A. Maloof. 2005. Using additive expert ensembles to cope with concept drift. In Proceedings of the 22nd International. Conference on Machine Learning, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 2366, Springer Berlin.
13. Lau, R. Y. K. 2005. Adaptive negotiation agents for e-business. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Eletronic Commerce, pages 271-278, Xi'an, China.
14. Maloof, M. 2002. Incremental learning with partial instance memory. In Proceedings of the XIII International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems. Lyon, France.
15. Mitchell, T. 1997. Machine Learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
16. Saha, S., A. Biswas, and S. Sen. 2005. Modeling opponent decision in repeated one-shot negotiations. In Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS'05), pages 397-403.
17. Schlimmer, J. and R. Granger. 1986. Beyond incremental processing: Tracking concept drift. In Proceedings of the 5th AAAI Conference, pages 502-507. AAAI Press.
18. Stanley, K. O. 2003. Learning Concept Drift with a Committee of Decision Trees, University of Texas, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report AI-03-302, September.
19. Tsymbal, A. 2004. The problem of concept drift: Definitions and related work. Technical Report TCO-CS-2004-15, Department of Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, 2004.
20. Widmer, G. and M. Kubat. 1996. Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning 23 (1):69-101.
21. Zeng, D. and K Sycara. 1998. Bayesian learning in negotiation. International journal on Human-Computer Studies 48:125-141.