Neuro MR: Protocols

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 838-847

  Mikulis, David J ^a   Roberts, Timothy P L ^b  

^a TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Central nervous system; Imaging protocols; MRI; Neuroimaging; Pulse sequences

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

BIOPHYSICS; BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; HUMAN; NEUROIMAGING; NEURORADIOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION PHYSICS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ANGIOGRAPHY; BRAIN; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; EPILEPSY; GADOLINIUM; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROLOGY; PROTONS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 35148816694     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21041     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. 2 and FLAIR MRI in the Sydney Older Persons Study. Eur J Neurol 2005;12:399-402.
2. Bakshi R, Ariyaratana S, Benedict RH, Jacobs L. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Arch Neurol 2001;58:742-748.
3. Grossman RI, McGowan JC. Perspectives on multiple sclerosis. Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1251-1265.
4. Filippi M, Horsfield MA, Hajnal JV, et al. Quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance imaging lesion load in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64(Suppl 1):S88-S93.
5. Simon JH, Li D, Traboulsee A, et al. Standardized MR imaging protocol for multiple sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers consensus guidelines. Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:455-461.
6. Knopp EA, Cha S, Johnson G, et al. Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 1999;211:791-798.
7. Patankar TF, Haroon HA, Mills SJ, et al. Is volume transfer coefficient (K(trans)) related to histologic grade in human gliomas? Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2455-2465.
8. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Brasch RC, Dillon WP. Quantitative measurement of microvascular permeability in human brain tumors achieved using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: correlation with histologic grade. Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:891-899.
9. Kitis O, Altay H, Calli C, Yunten N, Akalin T, Yurtseven T. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors. Eur J Radiol 2005;55:393-400.
10. Yamasaki F, Kurisu K, Satoh K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient of human brain tumors at MR imaging. Radiology 2005;235:985-991.
11. Calvar JA, Meli FJ, Romero C, et al. Characterization of brain tumors by MRS, DWI and Ki-67 labeling index. J Neurooncol 2005;72:273-280.
12. Roessler K, Donat M, Lanzenberger R, et al. Evaluation of preoperative high magnetic field motor functional MRI (3 Tesla) in glioma patients by navigated electrocortical stimulation and postoperative outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1152-1157.
13. Keles GE, Berger MS. Advances in neurosurgical technique in the current management of brain tumors. Semin Oncol 2004;31:659-665.
14. Berman JI, Berger MS, Mukherjee P, Henry RG. Diffusion-tensor imaging-guided tracking of fibers of the pyramidal tract combined with intraoperative cortical stimulation mapping in patients with gliomas. J Neurosurg 2004;101:66-72.
15. Bartolomei F, Khalil M, Wendling F, et al. Entorhinal cortex involvement in human mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: an electrophysiologic and volumetric study. Epilepsia 2005;46:677-687.
16. Wu WC, Huang CC, Chung HW, et al. Hippocampal alterations in children with temporal lobe epilepsy with or without a history of febrile convulsions: evaluations with MR volumetry and proton MR spectroscopy. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1270-1275.
17. Varho T, Komu M, Sonninen P, Lahdetie J, Holopainen IE. Quantitative HMRS and MRI volumetry indicate neuronal damage in the hippocampus of children with focal epilepsy and infrequent seizures. Epilepsia 2005;46:696-703.
18. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography - initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244-251.
19. Farb RI, Nag S, Scott JN, et al. Surveillance of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: a comparison of MRA techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:507-515.
20. The NINDS t-PA Stroke Study Group. Intracerebral hemorrhage after intravenous t-PA therapy for ischemic stroke. Stroke 1997;28:2109-2118.
21. Furlan A, Higashida R, Wechsler L, et al. Intra-arterial prourokinase for acute ischemic stroke: the PROACT II Study: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 1999;282:2003-2011.
22. Saver JL. Time is brain - quantified. Stroke 2006;37:263-266.
23. Kim EY, Na DG, Kim SS, Lee KH, Ryoo JW, Kim HK. Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation in acute ischemic stroke: role of diffusion-weighted imaging and early parenchymal enhancement. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1050-1055.
24. Kassner A, Roberts T, Taylor K, Silver F, Mikulis D. Prediction of hemorrhage in acute ischemic stroke using permeability MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2213-2217.
25. Zhuo T, Gullapalli RP. MR artifacts, safety, and quality control. Radiographics 2006;26:275-220.