Introductory Psychology Student Performance: Weekly Quizzes Followed by a Cumulative Final Exam

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 177-180

  Landrum, R Eric ^a  

^a BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34948838872     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00986280701498566     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Grabe M. (1994). Motivational deficiencies when multiple examinations are allowed. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 45–52.
2. Grover C. A. Becker A. H. Davis S. F. (1989). Chapters and units: Frequent versus infrequent testing revisited. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 192–194.
3. Harnisch D. L. Rotheroe D. (1986). ITEMBANK: An item bank package for the IBM PC. Urbana, IL: Institute for Child Behavior and Development. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED298131).
4. Kahn I. (2000). Students' performance on makeup examinations and other evaluations. Psychological Reports, 87, 747–749.
5. Lahey B. B. (2004). Psychology: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
6. Perlman B. McCann L. I. (1999). The structure of the psychology undergraduate curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 171–176.
7. Rickard H. C. Rogers R. Ellis N. R. Beidleman W. B. (1988). Some retention, but not enough. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 151–152.
8. VanderStoep S. W. Fagerlin A. Feenstra J. S. (2000). What do students remember from introductory psychology? Teaching of Psychology, 27, 89–92.
9. Weimer M. (2002). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco: Wiley.