Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 105, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 127-141

  Frykholm, Jeffrey ^a   Glasson, George ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34848901752     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2005.tb18047.x     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adams, P.E., & Krockover, G.H. (1997). Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81.(1), 29–50.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Ball, D.L. (1990a). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers' understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132–144.
5. Ball, D.L. (1990b). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.
6. Ball, D.L., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
7. Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85.(4), 426–453.
8. Benson, G.D. (1989). Epistemology and science curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21, 329–344.
9. Berlin, D.F. (1991). Integrating science and mathematics in teaching and learning: A bibliography (School Science and Mathematics Association Topics for Teachers Series, No. 6). Columbus, Ohio: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
10. Berlin, D.F., & White, A.L. (1992). Report from the NSF/SSMA Wingspread Conference: A network for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 92, 340–342.
11. Berlin, D.F., & White, A.L. (1995). Connecting school science and mathematics. In P.A. House & A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting mathematics across the curriculum. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
12. Borko, H. (2004, April). Teacher learning and professional development: Mapping the terrain. Presidential Address delivered at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
13. Brown, C.A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.
14. Brown, C., Cooney, T., & Jones, D. (1990). Mathematics teacher education. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 639–656). New York: Macmillan.
15. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18.(1), 32–42.
16. Cobb, P. (2000). The importance of a situated view of learning to the design of research and instruction. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
17. Cobb, P., & Bowers, J.S. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28.(2), 4–15.
18. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28.(3), 258–277.
19. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.
20. Fennema, E., & Franke, M. (1992). Teachers' knowledge and its impact. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
21. Floden, R.E. (1993). Findings on learning to teach. East Lansing: Michigan State University, College of Education, National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
22. Frykholm, J.A. (1996). Pre-service teachers in mathematics: Struggling with the Standards. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(1), 665–682.
23. Frykholm, J.A. (1998). Beyond supervision: Learning to teach mathematics in community. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14.(3), 305–322.
24. Good, R. (1991). Editorial: Research on science-mathematics connections. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(2), 109.
25. Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.
26. Hammrich, P.L. (1997). Teaching for excellence in K-8 science education: Using Project 2061 benchmarks for more effective science instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 48.(3), 222–232.
27. Knapp, M.S. (1997). Between systemic reforms and the science and mathematics classroom: The dynamics of innovation, implementation, and professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 67.(2), 227–266.
28. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Lederman, N.G., Gess-Newsome, J., & Latz, M.S. (1994). The nature and development of preservice science teachers' conceptions of subject matter and pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31.(2), 129–146.
32. Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J., & Czerniak, C. (2000). Assessing teachers' beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(3), 123–145.
33. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32.(3), 236–266.
34. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
35. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29.(1), 4–15.
37. Roth, W-M., & Bowen, M. (1994). Mathematization of experience in a grade 8 open-inquiry environment: An introduction to the representational practices of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31.(3), 293–318.
38. Roth, W.M., & McGinn, M.K. (1998). Knowing, researching, and reporting science education: Lessons from science and technology studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35.(2), 213–235.
39. Schram, P., Wilcox, S., Lappan, G., & Lanier, P. (1989). Changing preservice teachers' beliefs about mathematics education. In C. Maher, G. Goldin, & R. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.
40. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15.(2), 4–14.
41. Spradley, J. (1979a). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
42. Spradley, J. (1979b). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
43. Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wolcott, H.F. (1993). Transforming qualitative data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–477.